The Cochrane database of systematic reviews

Six-dose artemether-lumefantrine treatment for uncomplicated malaria

Updated

Abstract

The six-dose regimen of artemether-lumefantrine was tested in nine trials involving 4547 participants.

  • Total treatment failure at day 28 was lower for artemether-lumefantrine compared to amodiaquine and amodiaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.
  • No difference in treatment failure was observed when comparing artemether-lumefantrine with chloroquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.
  • Artemether-lumefantrine performed better than amodiaquine plus artesunate but worse than mefloquine plus artesunate.
  • There was no significant difference in effectiveness when compared to dihydroartemisinin-napthoquine-trimethoprim.
  • The regimen appears more effective than antimalarial treatments not containing artemisinin derivatives.

Simplified

Full Text

Full text is available at the source.

Funding

Competing interests

Paul Garner and Carrol Gamble (né Preston) were unpaid technical advisers to a World Health Organization meeting on 19 and 20 February, 2001 considering efficacy and effectiveness studies of co‐artemether‐lumefantrine. The World Health Organization paid for their travel and accommodation, and a representative of Novartis chaired the meeting. Aika Omari: none known
PubMed

What Lands in Your Inbox Each Week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free