What this is
- Childhood obesity is rising globally, particularly in low- and middle-income countries like Mexico, where the combined overweight and obesity rate is estimated at 37%.
- This study examines the relationship between body mass index (BMI) z-score, body composition parameters, and health indicators such as blood pressure and grip strength in school-age children.
- Using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and vector analysis (BIVA), the research assesses how these factors correlate with () in a sample of 61 children.
Essence
- Low () and high () are common in both normal-weight and overweight children. BMI z-score and body composition metrics effectively discriminate .
Key takeaways
- One-third of normal-weight children had high (>75th percentile), and 93.5% had low (<25th percentile). This indicates that BMI alone may not accurately reflect body composition health.
- BIVA identified a significant prevalence of cachexia in both normal-weight and overweight children, suggesting that body composition abnormalities are common and may not be detected by BMI.
- All adiposity indicators demonstrated good performance in discriminating , with FM% showing the highest area under the ROC curve (0.794). This underscores the importance of assessing body composition beyond BMI.
Caveats
- The small sample size of 61 children limits the generalizability of findings and increases the risk of type II error in associations between body composition and .
- The study's observational design cannot establish causation between body composition phenotypes and health outcomes, necessitating further research in larger populations.
- Body composition assessments were conducted outside clinical settings, which may affect blood pressure measurements and their classification.
Definitions
- Elevated Blood Pressure (EBP): Blood pressure values at or above the 90th percentile for age, sex, and height.
- Fat Mass Index (FMI): Fat mass divided by height squared, used to assess body fat relative to body size.
- Fat-Free Mass Index (FFMI): Fat-free mass divided by height squared, indicating muscle mass relative to body size.
AI simplified
Introduction
Childhood obesity is a relevant public health issue globally and continues to increase particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where it coexists with diverse forms of undernutrition1. In Mexico, current combined overweight and obesity rate in school-age children is estimated to be 37%2. There is strong evidence linking childhood obesity to diverse health outcomes, including elevated blood pressure (EBP)3,4. A large analysis of data from European children and adolescent reveled that the prevalence of primary hypertension ranged from 5% in normal weight children up to 39% in children with severe obesity5. However, recent data suggest that excess fat mass (FM) may have a delirious impact on blood pressure levels even in normal-weight children6, pointing out the challenge of health risk stratification based on BMI classification in children7, since it does not allow to distinguish between different body compartments.
On the other hand, handgrip strength test is widely used in the pediatric population as a good proxy of whole-body muscle strength due to its strong correlation with whole-body muscle strength in children and adolescents; clinically, it is also considered as an indicator of muscle functionality8. Low muscle mass and strength have also been linked to adverse health outcomes in childhood8,9; in fact, a large cross-sectional study in children and adolescents reported an adjusted decreased risk of having high systolic blood pressure associated with increased lean soft tissue (LST) by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)10. In addition, it has been suggested that the co-existence of obesity and reduced muscle mass, which is known as sarcopenic obesity, may imply more adverse effects that obesity alone. However, this and other body composition phenotypes and their health implications have been poorly studied in children; in part, due to the lack of consensus for its definition and diagnostic methods11, requiring population-specific normative data. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a non-invasive and convenient method to assess the body composition in pediatric population, and has been demonstrated to be accurate relative to DXA12. Besides conventional BIA, which uses prediction equations to estimate body compartments, the bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) has been proposed as an alternative method to assess body composition of children without making any of the assumption required for conventional BIA13.
Taking all together, it is relevant to generate evidence regarding the utility of the non-invasive BIA method to identify body composition alterations of children at different body weight levels and its association with health outcomes.
The primary objective of this study was to assess the association between body weight status by BMI z-score and body composition parameters by conventional BIA and BIVA. Secondarily, we aimed to explore the association between BIVA and hand-grip strength, as well as to assess the performance of BMI z-score and body composition parameters in discriminating EBP in a sample of school-age Mexican children.
Methods
Study sample and recruitment
This cross-sectional study is a pilot of a larger study aimed at evaluating the association between different phenotypes of body composition with cardio-metabolic risk markers and gut microbiota profiles in Mexican school-age children. For this pilot, a convenience sample of 61 healthy children were consecutively recruited from 3 public elementary schools located in Mexico City and conurbation area from May to September 2023. Children were also recruited from the community by a word-of-mouth strategy during the same period. Children of any sex were included if they were 8–12 years old and excluded if they had a chronic disease such as hypertension, cancer, diabetes, heart, renal or liver disease, pacemaker or limb amputation.
Participating public schools’ authorities allowed the research team members to meet with parents at school during an informative meeting to invite them to take place in the study. Parents who were interested were provided with further detailed information and eligibility was confirmed. Participants’ parents recruited from the community contacted the research team members for detailed information and eligibility confirmation.
The study protocol was approved by the Anahuac University Research and Bioethics Committees under number 202302. Research was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Parents or guardians provided written informed consent and children provided assent to be involved in the study.
Assessments
Study visits were conducted at school in a private room assigned for this purpose. Children recruited from the community were evaluated in a consultation office enabled for this research purpose. Anthropometric, hand-grip strength, body composition, and blood pressure assessments were conducted the day of the visit. In addition, sociodemographic data were collected. All measures were conducted by standardized trained research personnel using previously calibrated equipment.
Anthropometrics
Weight and height were measured following standardized procedures described by the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK)14. All anthropometric measures were taken by the same previously standardized research personnel. Participants were asked to use light clothing and children were barefoot. Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a Seca 213 stadiometer (seca GmbH & Co. KG., Hamburg, Germany). Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using a calibrated digital Omron scale HBF-514C® (Omron Healthcare Co, Ltd, Kyoto, Japan).
BMI z-score was calculated and classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) age- and gender-specific growth standards with the WHO Anthro Plus software15. Thinness was defined as a BMI z-score < − 2 standard deviations (SD), normal weight as z-score between − 2 SD and + 1 SD, overweight as z-score > + 1 SD, and obesity as z-score > + 2 SD16.
Handgrip strength
It was measured using a Lafayette® hand dynamometer. Patients were instructed to assume a sitting position with a straight back facing forward, with the elbow positioned at a right angle of 90° and apply as much handgrip pressure as possible by using their dominant hand. The measurements were repeated three times, and the mean value in kg of the three measurements was used for analysis. All measurements were made by a single evaluator. Children with a grip strength below the 25th percentile for age and sex were considered to have low grip strength17.
Body composition
Whole-body bioelectrical impedance analysis was performed using an RJL Systems analyzer (Quantum X, Clinton Township, MI, USA) by trained nutritionist. An alternating electric current of 800 mA at 50 kHz was applied following standard procedures18, and the resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) were measured.
Children were required to meet certain conditions which included fasting overnight or avoiding consumption of food and beverages for at least 4 h before the measurement. They were also not to have engaged in strenuous exercise 24 h before the measurement. Girls who were menstruating at the time of recruitment were scheduled for the study visit after menstruation ended. All children were asked to empty their bladder before and not to wear any metal object during measurement. BIA assessment was conducted at “room temperature”19,20.
Conventional BIA
R and Xc were further processed by using the Body Composition 4.0 software provided by the manufacturer. Kilograms and percent of total body weight were estimated for fat mass (FM), fat free mass (FFM), lean soft tissue (LST), and skeletal muscle mass (SMM) by using the prediction equations for pediatric population included in the software. In addition, FM and FFM indexes (FMI, FFMI) were calculated by dividing FM and FFM by height in squared to adjust for body size. Children with an FMI above the 75th percentile or FFMI below the 25th percentile for age and sex according to a reference Mexican population21, were considered to have high FMI or low FFMI, respectively.
Bioelectrical vector analysis (BIVA)
This analysis offers a semi-quantitative assessment of body cell mass and body water, and has been considered a useful method to assess hydration and nutritional status in a variety of populations at all stages of life22. Individual raw measurement of whole-body impedance, R and Xc, were standardized by height and were plotted on the tolerance ellipses of the Mexican pediatric population by age and sex23. According to the location of the quadrant outside the 75th percentile, they were classified in one of four categories: thinness (upper right), athletic (upper left), obesity (lower left) or cachexia (lower right). Children who were located within the 50th or 75th percentiles were classified as normal, regardless of the quadrant.
For group vector analysis of children according to the classification of hand-grip strength: (1) equal or greater the 25th percentile for sex and age, or (2) below the 25th percentile for sex and age, the values of R/H and Xc/H in Ohm/m were transformed into bivariate Z-scores (i.e. Z(R) and Z(Xc)) using the mean and standard deviation (SD) of the gender- and sex-specific reference healthy population of Mexican children23. following the methodology proposed by Piccoli et al.24. Mean, standard deviation and correlation coefficient of R/H and Xc/H were calculated for these two hand-grip strength groups in order to construct mean vectors for each group and identify the differences between them. Mean group vectors were represented as point vectors with their 95% confidence ellipse. Separate 95% confidence ellipses indicated a statistically significant difference between mean vector positions on the Z (R) and Z (Xc) plane.
BIVA tolerance ellipses were constructed based on data from 1331 children, 661 boys and 670 girls aged 2 to 15 years. Children were recruited from 6 schools and 5 Child Welfare Center in Mexico City in 200623. Tolerance ellipses were constructed following the methodology proposed by Piccoli et al.25.
Blood pressure
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure was measured in a seating position in the right arm after a 10-min rest using an aneroid sphygmomanometer (Welch Allyn, Inc, Skaneateles Falls, New York) and a pediatric appropriately sized cuff. Three measurements were taken with 3-min intervals and the average was used for analysis. BP was classified using the population-based percentiles provided by the American Academy of Pediatrics for height, sex, and age. Elevated blood pressure was defined as systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure values ≥ 90th percentile26.
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (25th, 75th percentiles), according to the variable distribution assessed by the Shapiro Wilk test. Categorical variables are presented as absolute and relative frequencies. Descriptive statistics are presented by sex. For comparison of continues variables between study groups, the Student’s t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test was employed, while comparison of categorical variables was carried out by the chi-square test or Fisher exact test.
Differences of group vectors between children with a hand-grip strength below or above the 25th percentile for sex and age was assessed by the Hotelling’s t-squared test. The receiving operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was employed to test the ability of BMI z-score, FM% and FMI to discriminate children with EBP from those with normal blood pressure through the areas under the ROC curve (AURC), for which 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were constructed. ROC curves were compared among the three adiposity indicators. All analyses were performed with commercially available software (SPSS 24.0 for Windows, SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL), except for the bioelectrical vector analysis, for which the BIVA tolerance and confidence software were used27 (BIVA software is available at http://www.renalgate.it/formule_calcolatori/bioimpedenza.htm↗). No missing data were identified.
Results
| Characteristic | Overall | Boys(n = 32) | Girls(n = 29) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 9.8 (8.5, 11.0) | 9.9 (8.2, 11.0) | 9.6 (9.0, 11) |
| Weight (kg) | 34.1 (28.4, 47.3) | 34.5 (28.1, 48.7) | 33.9 (28.4, 47.3) |
| Height (cm) | 139.1 ± 10.4 | 137.7 ± 10.4 | 140.6 ± 10.3 |
| BMI (kg/m)2 | 17.9 (15.7, 23.1) | 18.3 (15.9, 23.7) | 17.4 (15.4, 22.2) |
| Weight status by Z-BMI | |||
| Normal (n, [%]) | 31 (50.8) | 14 (43.8) | 17 (58.6) |
| Overweight (n, [%]) | 13 (21.3) | 7 (21.9) | 6 (20.7) |
| Obesity (n, [%]) | 17 (27.9) | 11 (34.4) | 6 (20.7) |
| Hand-grip strength (kg) | 13.9 ± 4.7 | 14.8 ± 4.3 | 12.8 ± 5.1 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 97.3 ± 9.7 | 97.4 ± 10.2 | 97.1 ± 9.4 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 61.8 ± 7.8 | 62.1 ± 8.5 | 61.4 ± 7.0 |
Association between weight status by Z-BMI and body composition parameters
Weight status and conventional BIA
Distribution of FMI > 75th percentile and FFMI < 25th percentile between Z-BMI weight status categories in school-age children. *p value by Chitest for comparison of FMI categories between BMI z-score categories. **p value by Chitest for comparison of FFMI categories between BMI z-score categories. 2 2
Distribution of FMI and FFMI categories in school-age children by sex. *p value by Chi2 test for comparison of categories between boys and girls.
| Characteristic | Normal(n = 31) | Overweight/obesity(n = 30) | Overall p valuea |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMI z-score (SD) | − 0.5 (0.8, 0.0) | 2.2 (1.3, 2.8) | < 0.001 |
| Hand-grip strength (kg) | 12.4 ± 4.7 | 15.4 ± 4.3 | 0.013 |
| FM (kg) | 7.5 ± 2.8 | 21.3 ± 7.6 | < 0.001 |
| FM (%) | 25.1 ± 6.3 | 43.6 ± 7.4 | < 0.001 |
| FMI (kg/m)2 | 4.0 ± 1.2 | 10.4 ± 3.4 | < 0.001 |
| FFM (kg) | 21.9 ± 3.8 | 26.4 ± 4.6 | < 0.001 |
| FFM (%) | 74.9 ± 6.3 | 56.5 ± 7.4 | < 0.001 |
| FFMI (kg/m)2 | 11.8 ± 0.8 | 12.9 ± 1.0 | < 0.001 |
| LST (kg) | 20.4 ± 3.6 | 24.7 ± 4.3 | < 0.001 |
| LST (%) | 69.9 ± 6.0 | 52.7 ± 6.9 | < 0.001 |
| SMM (kg) | 8.6 ± 1.6 | 11.0 ± 2.3 | < 0.001 |
| SMM (%) | 29.5 ± 3.2 | 23.5 ± 3.2 | < 0.001 |
Weight status and bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA)
Distribution of BIVA body composition categories between BMI z-score weight status categories in school-age children. *p value by Chi2 test for comparison of BIVA categories between BMI z-score categories.
RXc z score graph showing group impedance vectors for hand-grip strength split at 25th percentile for age and sex: ≥ 25th percentile in black and < 25th percentile blue. *p value for comparing mean group vectors by the Hotelling´s t-squared test.
Weight status, body composition and elevated blood pressure
| BMI z-score categories | EBP (n [%]) |
|---|---|
| Normal (n = 31) | 1 (3.2) |
| Overweight/obesity (n = 30) | 6 (20) |
| *p value among categories | 0.053 |
| FMI-FFMI categories | |
| Normal FMI + normal FFMI (n = 2) | 0 (0) |
| High FMI + normal FFMI (n = 14) | 2 (14.3) |
| Normal FMI + low FFMI (n = 19) | 1 (5.3) |
| High FMI + low FFMI (n = 26) | 4 (15.4) |
| **p value among categories | 0.687 |
| BMI z-score | FM (%) | FMI (kg/m)2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AURC (95% CI)p value | AURC (95% CI)p value | AURC (95% CI)p value | |
| EBP (≥ 90 percentile*) | 0.770 (0.577, 0.962) 0.006 | 0.794 (0.618, 0.969) 0.001 | 0.775 (0.604, 0.946) 0.002 |
Discussion
In this study in school-age children, the main findings are as follows: First, a third of children with normal weight by BMI z-score had high adiposity (FMI > 75th percentile) and more than 90% of them were classified has having low FFMI (FFMI < 25th percentile). In addition, more than 50% of children with overweight or obesity by BMI z-score presented a low FFMI (< 25th percentile for sex and age). These data confirm that low FFMI is common in this sample of children and identifying deficiency of FFM might be hindered by using only BMI indicators. Second, BIVA method was able to identify a high prevalence of cachexia in both BMI z-score groups. The prevalence of sarcopenic obesity and its health implications in pediatric population has not been well studied due to the lack of consensus of clear diagnostic criteria in this population11; however, these results show that by assessing body composition by BIVA, we can identify certain phenotypes of deficiency of muscle mass and preserved or excess body fat, regardless body weight. Finally, 4 out of 7 children with EBP had a body composition phenotype characterized by high FMI and low FFMI. Whether or not this body composition phenotype implies a greater cardiometabolic risk even in children needs to be further determined in larger studies. Nonetheless, these results provide relevant information to consider the BIA methods as useful to identify different body composition phenotypes with potential health implications.
Body mass index is a good screening measure for adiposity; however, it is well known that its correlation with FMI is better at higher than lower BMI values28–30, and thus, adiposity may be underestimated in children with normal weight, nonetheless, weight outcomes are still the main goal for obesity managing and its related comorbidity risk31. Herein, we reported a greater mean FMI among children with overweight or obesity compared to their normal weight counterparts (10.4 ± 3.4 vs. 4.0 ± 1.2, < 0.001); however, when children were classified using the sex- and age-specific FMI normative values for pediatric Mexican population, more than 30% of children in the normal weight group were classified as having high FMI. These results are in congruence with those reported by Clasey et al.7, who reported a large proportion of children with high percent of FM (determined by BIA) among healthy weight children (defined by a BMI percentile > 5th, < 85th), particularly among boys (56/289, 19.4%), questioning the “low-risk” connotation attributed to a body weight in normal range. This is supported by the study conducted by Bai et al. in Chinese children, where it was observed a positive association between percent of FM and abnormal blood pressure in normal-weight children6.
Importantly, low FFMI was a frequent condition among both children with normal weight (93.5%) and overweigh/obesity (53.3%) in this study. Clasey et al.7 also reported a high prevalence of low FFMI among boys (49.8%) and girls (40.1%) with normal weight. Of note, more than 50% of children with overweight/obesity in our study had low FFMI, and 42.6% had both high FMI and low FFMI, suggesting a potential risk of sarcopenic obesity. Sack et al.32 reported a higher prevalence of sarcopenia (69.7%) as defined by using the muscle-to-fat-ratio determined by BIA, among German children and adolescents with obesity. In such study, sarcopenia was associated with higher gamma-glutamyl transferase, glutamate pyruvate transaminase, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and diastolic blood pressure, and lower muscular and cardiorespiratory fitness compared with obesity without sarcopenia. Despite the potential clinical consequences of sarcopenic obesity in children, a recent systematic review11 points out the need for population-, age-, and sex-specific definition criteria for sarcopenic obesity, as well as consensus on the valid technics for its assessment.
In our study, we reported that 6 out of 7 cases of EBP were observed among children with high FMI, with or without low FFMI, as measured by BIA. When BMI z-score, percent of FM, and FMI discriminating performance for EBP was tested, all of these adiposity indictors showed a good AURC (ranging between 0.770 and 0.794); with the highest value for percent of FM (0.794), although there were no significant differences among them. Chen et al.33 reported that that percent of FM was associated with EBP (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 1.043, 95%CI = 1.027–1.059) in Chinese children; however, the role of FFM or muscle mass in this association was not investigated. In our study, 4 out of 7 children with EBP had high FMI and low FFMI.
We explored the usefulness of an alternative BIVA method for body composition assessment in children. This method identified a large proportion of children presenting a body composition alteration characterized by a low content of muscle mass and preserved or increased fat mass, named as cachexia, in both the normal (58.1%) and overweight/obesity (43.3%) BMI z-score groups. In a study of 8-year-old Italian children34, 7 out of 218 vectors of children with normal-weight and 3 out of 135 of vectors of children with overweight by BMI fell out of the 75% tolerance ellipses of the cachexia quadrant (right and lower quadrant), while 81 out of 111 children with obesity by BMI fell within the 75% tolerance ellipse, indicating no altered body composition by BIVA. On the other hand, Oliveira et al.35, in a study of 78 Brazilian adolescents with obesity, reported the presence of cachexia by BIVA in 21.9% of girls and 6.5% of boys. Although these studies observed a lower proportion of cachexia compared to our findings, results are consistent in showing that weight status assessment by BMI may not identify children with an altered muscle mass phenotype. Similar findings have been observed in adult patient population studies36,37.
It is important to note that our study was conducted post COVID-19 pandemic, which may have influenced body composition phenotype in these children due to less physical activity associated to the long-term implemented lockdown. This may explain, at least in part, the high proportion of children with cachexia by BIVA in this study.
The BIVA method was also able to discriminate between children with low or normal grip strength for sex and age, displaying a group vector in the quadrants of cachexia and thinness outside the 75th and 95th tolerance ellipses for those with low grip strength. Children with normal grip strength exhibited shorter vectors located only in the cachexia quadrant within the 75th and 95th tolerance ellipses. A study in adult population also reported a correlation between BIVA parameters and grip strength, where Xc/H (cell membrane surface and membrane integrity indicator) was associated positively with a 0.573 kg hand grip strength increase per additional unit, while R/H (fluid volume indicator) was associated with a 0.063 kg strength decrease per unit increase38. Whether or not BIVA phenotypes are associated with other health outcomes in pediatric population needs to be further investigated.
Taking all together, we can highlight the relevance of body composition assessment for growth and nutritional status monitoring beyond BMI39, but also for identifying health risks associated with body composition alterations that guide early prevention strategies in this population, such as programs to prevent and manage excessive adiposity and deficiency of muscle mass, regardless body weight. However, it is important to taking into consideration that a proper interpretation of body composition parameters requires of normative values that are population-, sex- and age-specific, which are not always available for all populations.
This study has the following main limitations: first, the small sample size involved limited may have increased the probability of occurrence of type II error for the association between the different body composition phenotypes (identified by conventional and vectorial BIA) and EBP. However, this is the first study assessing the utility of BIVA and its association with grip-strength, an indicator of muscle function, in healthy children. Second, association between body composition and EBP needs to be considered in the context of other potential confounding variables such as physical activity and diet. However, it is important to note that BMI z-score, FMI, and FFMI were classified according to sex- and age-specific normative values, and EPB was defined according to height-, sex- and age-specific cut-offs. Third, reference population from which BIVA tolerance ellipses were constructed was limited to a modest sample of children from Mexico City; further research in larger populations is needed to develop representative normative values for BIVA. Forth, due to the nature of this study conducted outside the clinical setting, EBP was determined based on 3 blood pressure measurement taken the same day. Finally, sampling strategy of this small sample size was not probabilistic, thus, result should not be generalized to all school-age children from Mexico City and conurbation area.
Conclusion
In this study in school-age children, low FFMI by conventional BIA and cachexia defined by BIVA were common in both children with normal weight and those with overweight or obesity; thus, identifying deficiency of FFM might be limited by using solely BMI indicators. Low grip strength was associated with a more compromised body composition by BIVA. This body composition method appears to be a useful alternative to assess body composition in children without making any assumptions about body weight.
Both BMI z-score and FM (% and FMI), performed well at discriminating EBP. The impact of low FFMI in addition to high FM on the risk of EBP and other cardiometabolic risk markers needs to be further studied in a larger population.