Introduction
Muscle atrophy is one of the major pathological features of cancer cachexia. In recent years, the ‘muscle‐gut axis’ concept has been introduced through academic discussions, suggesting that the gut microbiota could influence muscle mass and function through intermediary metabolites or modulation of intestinal physiology [1]. Research has revealed abnormalities in the gut microbiota composition and metabolic processes in mice with C26‐induced cachexia. Specifically, there is an increased prevalence of Firmicutes and a decreased prevalence of Bacteroidetes, as well as abnormalities in bile acid metabolism within the intestines [2]. A clinical study on faecal samples from cachectic cancer patients revealed that there are differences in gut microbiota abundance among cachectic cancer patients, and the levels of SCFAs tend to decrease, with acetic acid showing a significant reduction [3]. Although more studies have shown preliminary results of the gut microbiota and metabolites in cancer cachexia [4, 5], the specific mechanisms involved remain unclear.
Muribaculaceae (formerly designated S24–7), a family of beneficial bacteria belonging to the order Bacteroidales, is commonly found in the intestines of mice [6, 7]. Over 600 bacterial species across 10 genera, including Muribaculum intestinale have been identified [8], with limited research on Muribaculum intestinale. Emerging evidence underscores the intriguing association between Muribaculaceae and longevity [9]. Studies show a significant decrease in Muribaculaceae in sarcopenia patients, inversely related to blood lipid levels, suggesting its role in regulating cellular membrane fatty acid composition [10].
The dynamic interplay between intestinal probiotics and prebiotic substrates affects probiotic colonization and proliferation, with dietary fibre being a pivotal prebiotic influencing probiotic growth [11, 12]. As an indigestible carbohydrate, it undergoes fermentation by the gut microbiota, profoundly influencing the microbiome's composition and functionality [13]. Its consumption provides various health benefits, reducing the risk of cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, obesity, Type 2 diabetes and other maladies [14]. Inulin, primarily sourced from inulin‐rich roots, is a soluble fibre garnering significant attention, and numerous investigations have indicated its correlation with the abundance of Muribaculaceae [15]. In a leukaemia‐induced cachexia mouse model, inulin‐type fructans with Lactobacillus reuteri markedly improved the gut microbiota composition, bolstered intestinal barrier integrity and immune competence and ameliorated cachexia symptoms [16].
SCFAs, resulting from dietary fibre fermentation in the gut, are short‐chain fatty acids with carbon chains of 1–6 atoms, with total colonic concentrations of 50–150 mM [17]. The three most abundant SCFAs are acetic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid [18]. Their production is influenced by gut microbiota and dietary fibre intake. SCFAs contribute to protein synthesis, cellular metabolism, immune modulation, intestinal integrity, lipid metabolism and anti‐inflammatory effects [19]. Some studies suggest SCFAs intake can improve muscle atrophy, though the specific mechanism is unclear [20, 21]. Butyric acid, a four‐carbon metabolic product of gut bacteria, is the most potent anti‐inflammatory SCFA. It reduces TNF‐α, inflammation and boosts survival in diseased mice [21].
In this study, we explored the relationships among the gut microbiota, intestinal metabolites and cachexia, focusing on Muribaculaceae, Muribaculum intestinale and SCFAs in cancer cachexia‐associated muscle atrophy. We investigated the potential therapeutic effects of MI, butyrate and inulin supplementation. Our findings may complement existing research on the gut–muscle axis in cancer cachexia.
Methods
Cell Culture
C2C12 cells were cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% P/S until confluent and then differentiated into myotubes in DMEM with 2% horse serum for 5–7 days. Colon‐26 carcinoma (C26) cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% FBS and 1% P/S. Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) cells were cultured in DMEM with the same supplements. After 48 h, C26 and LLC supernatants were collected, filtered and co‐cultured with myotubes. Sodium butyrate (1 mM) was added 24 h before RNA and protein extraction. All cells were maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2.
Animal Models and Experiment
Specific pathogen‐free (SPF) male BALB/c and C57BL/6J mice, aged 6–8 weeks, were obtained from Nanjing Junke Biotechnology Co., Ltd. and housed under a 12h light/dark cycle at 22°C–24°C and 40%–60% humidity with free access to food and water. Cancer cachexia was induced by subcutaneous injection of 5 × 105 C26 cells into BALB/c mice and 5 × 105 LLC cells into C57BL/6J mice, respectively [22]. The inulin diet and control diet were prepared by Nanjing Junke Biotechnology Co., Ltd., based on published literature [23]. Details of different animal experiments are described in the Supporting Information.
Quantitative Real‐Time PCR (qPCR)
Total RNA was extracted from frozen muscle tissue or cells using a total RNA extraction reagent. After determining the RNA concentration using a NanoDrop, 1 μg was reverse transcribed into cDNA. SYBR Green qPCR mix was used with β‐actin as an internal reference; primer sequences for all target genes are in Table S2.
16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Sequencing and Bioinformatics
Collected mouse faeces were immediately snap‐frozen in liquid nitrogen and preserved at −80°C. Sequencing and analysis were performed by Wuhan MetWare Metabolic Biotechnology Co., Ltd. [24]. Details are described in the Supporting Information.
Short‐Chain Fatty Acid Assessment
Mouse faeces were collected and stored as described above. SCFAs content was determined by Wuhan MetWare Metabolic Biotechnology Co., Ltd. using the Agilent 7890B‐7000D GC–MS/MS platform. Details are described in the Supporting. Information
RNA Sequencing and Bioinformatics
The total RNA extracted from mouse skeletal muscle was subjected to RNA sequencing on the Illumina Novaseq 6000 platform by LC Bio Technology Co., Ltd. Details of the bioinformatics are described in the. Supporting Information
Other methods such as Muribaculum intestinale culture, haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, immunofluorescence staining, protein extraction, Western blotting, ATP content measurement and untargeted metabolomics of muscle are described in the Supporting Information.
Statistical Analysis
The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Two‐tailed Student's t tests were used for comparisons between two groups. One‐way ANOVA tests were performed to compare multiple groups. The Spearman's correlation analysis was used to compute the association between differentially abundant microbial taxa and differential SCFAs. The analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0.1 and R 4.3.0. Values of p < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant and were presented as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ns indicates non‐significant.
Results
Alterations in Gut Microbiota Composition in Cachexia Model Mice
To elucidate the impact of gut microbiota on cancer cachexia, faecal samples from two murine models exhibiting cachexia were subjected to comprehensive 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing analysis. In the C26 cachexia model, alpha diversity, including Chao1, Shannon, ACE and Simpson indexes, showed no significant variation between control and cachexia groups, implying stability in microbial richness and evenness in cachexia (Figure S1a). In contrast, beta diversity analysis using nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) based on the amplicon sequence variant (ASV) revealed distinct microbial community clustering between control and cachexia mice (Figure 1a), indicating substantial structural changes. Further, a detailed taxonomic composition analysis revealed significant shifts at the phylum level. There was an increase in the relative abundances of p_Firmicutes and p_Proteobacteria and a decrease in p_Bacteroidota in the cachexia model (Figure 1b). LEfSe analysis revealed differentially abundant microbial taxa in cachexia mice, with enrichment of s_Escherichia_coli, o_unidentified_Clostridia, f_Lachnospiraceae, f_Bacteroidaceae and c_Gammaproteobacteria, and reduction of f_Muribaculaceae, o_Bacteroidales, c_Bacteroidia and s_Muribaculum intestinale (Figure 1c). Tax4Fun2‐based functional predictions from ASV data indicated significant enrichment in cellular processes, environmental information processing and various other biological and disease pathways (Figure S1b). The 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing revealed pronounced decreases in Muribaculaceae and Muribaculum intestinale in the cachexia group compared to p_Bacteroidota and o_Bacteroidales (Figure S1c–f). Specifically, Muribaculaceae and Muribaculum intestinale abundances dropped by 76.0% (Figure S1c) and 82.0% (Figure S1d), respectively, while p_Bacteroidota and o_Bacteroidales showed smaller reductions of approximately 35.4% (Figure S1e) and 36.3% (Figure S1f), respectively. Diverse Muribaculaceae species display substantial V4 16S rRNA gene sequence variation (Figure 1d), with Muribaculum intestinale being one of the few identified (Figure 1e). Its reduced abundance in cancer cachexia implicates a significant role for Muribaculaceae, particularly Muribaculum intestinale, in cachexia pathogenesis.
In the LLC cachexia model, alpha diversity indices showed increased microbial diversity (Figure S1g), and beta diversity highlighted intergroup differences (Figure S1h). Phylum‐level analysis revealed increased Firmicutes and a decrease in Bacteroidota (Figure S1i). LEfSe analysis indicated enrichment of g_Bacteroides, s_Bacteroides_sartorii and f_Bacteroidaceae and a reduction in f_Muribaculaceae, s_Faecalibaculum_rodentium, s_Muribaculum intestinale and s_Bifidobacterium_pseudolongum in LLC cachexia mice (Figure S1j). Functional annotation clustering confirmed gene enrichment in key pathways, including those for cellular processes and environmental information processing (Figure S1k). Our results reveal a significant alteration in gut microbiota in mouse models of cachexia, characterized primarily by a substantial decrease in Muribaculaceae and Muribaculum intestinale.

Abnormal gut microbiota distribution and reducedabundance in cachexia mouse model. (a) Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot illustrating the similarities in gut microbiota between control and cachectic mice. The purple and orange shadows represent clustering within the groups (= 6). (b) Stacked bar‐plot showing the top 10 most abundant bacterial at phylum level between control and cachectic mice. (c) The differences in gut microbiota abundance between the control and cachectic groups using linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis. (d) Heatmap analysis reveals the distribution of various Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) within the microbiome. The right panel represents the abundance of. (e) The abundance ofwithin the groups (= 6). Two‐tailed unpaired Student'stests was used. Statistical significance: *< 0.05; ****< 0.0001. Muribaculaceae n f_Muribaculaceae f_Muribaculaceae Muribaculum intestinale n t p p
Muribaculum Intestinale Supplementation Mitigates Cancer Cachexia
We evaluated the impact of Muribaculum intestinale, a Muribaculaceae family member, on a cachectic mouse model. Anaerobically cultured to a concentration of 109 CFU/mL, the strain was administered at 100 μL via gavage. Treatment with MI significantly improved cachexia, reducing weight loss (Figure S2a), preserving lean mass (Figure 2a), hindlimb muscles (Figure S2b) and quadriceps weight (Figure S2c) and enhancing grip strength (Figure 2b), with no effect on tumor size (Figure S2d).
MI treatment downregulated mRNA (Figure 2c) and protein (Figures 2d and S2e) levels of muscle atrophy markers Atrogin‐1 (Fbxo32 in mRNA) and MuRF1 (Murf1 in mRNA) in cachectic mice. This was paralleled by a reduction in p‐STAT3 (Figures 2d and S2e), suggesting an anti‐inflammatory effect and amelioration of muscle atrophy. H&E staining indicated muscle fibre preservation, with an increased cross‐sectional area (CSA) following treatment (Figures 2e and S2f). 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing confirmed elevated Muribaculum intestinale levels post‐administration (Figure 2f).
In the LLC cachexia model, MI treatment led to significant preservation of lean mass (Figure S2g) and hindlimb muscles (Figure S2h), and enhanced grip strength (Figure S2i), with no change in tumour weight (Figure S2j). H&E staining confirmed muscle fibre protection, as evidenced by increased CSA (Figure S2k). qPCR and Western blotting results mirrored those from C26 mice, showing reduced expression of muscle atrophy markers (Figure S2l, S2m). The 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing revealed increased faecal Muribaculum intestinale levels post‐treatment in LLC mice (Figure S2n). These findings suggest that Muribaculum intestinale, as a potential probiotic, can positively affect cachectic mouse models.

Supplementation withmitigates C26 cancer cachexia. (a) Weight of lean mass showing the changes in(MI) supplemented mice (= 5). (b) Grip strength of mice in each group before the end of the experiment (= 5). (c) Relative mRNA expression ofandin muscle from each group (= 5). (d) The protein expression of Atrogin‐1, MuRF1 and p‐STAT3 in the muscle of MI supplemented mice. (e) H&E staining of the quadriceps muscle shows MI supplementation's effect on muscle. The scale bar represents 100 μm. (f) The abundance of the MI after supplementation (= 5). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. One‐way ANOVA and two‐tailed unpaired Student'stests were used. Statistical significance: *< 0.05, ****< 0.0001. Muribaculum intestinale Muribaculum intestinale n n Fbxo32 Murf1 n n t p p
Decrease in SCFAs Associated With Reduced Muribaculaceae and Muribaculum Intestinale Abundance in Cachexia Mice
To investigate the potential consequences of the observed gut dysbiosis, we performed SCFAs analysis on faecal samples from C26 cachexia mice and healthy controls, and observed a significant reduction in SCFAs in the cachectic group: acetic acid (AA) by 52.5%, propionic acid (PA) by 60.9%, and valeric acid (VA) by 51.1%. Notably, butyric acid (BA) showed the most substantial decrease, at 65.3%. Levels of isovaleric acid (IVA), isobutyric acid (IBA), caproic acid (CA) and 2‐methylbutyric acid (2‐BA) remained unchanged (Figures 3a and S3a). Muscle tissue metabolomics revealed a clear separation between the NC and C26 cachexia groups in principal component analysis (PCA) (Figure S3b, S3c) and distinct clustering in metabolite heatmaps (Figure S3d,S3e), accompanied by downregulation in butanoate metabolism pathways (Figure 3b), suggesting a systemic impact of altered SCFA profiles. This decrease in butanoate metabolism suggests its critical role in cachexia, emphasizing its importance in the condition's pathophysiology.
To determine the correlation between microbial taxa shifts and metabolite profiles, we performed a Spearman correlation hierarchical clustering analysis. This analysis disclosed significant associations between gut microbiota at various taxonomic levels and SCFAs. At the phylum level, significant reductions in Bacteroidota, Euryarchaeota, Altiarchaeota and Crenarchaeota were positively correlated with decreases in specific SCFAs. In contrast, Myxococcota and Firmicutes showed negative correlations with SCFA levels (Figure S3f). At the class and order levels, we highlighted taxa such as Thermoplasmata, Limnochordia and Thermococci, which exhibited decreased abundance and positive correlations with certain SCFAs. Conversely, the abundance of classes such as Clostridia and Negativicutes increased, showing negative correlations with SCFA levels (Figure S3g). Similarly, at the order level, Eubacteriales and Bacteroidales significantly decreased and positively correlated with several SCFAs, while unidentified taxa within the unidentified Clostridia and Kapabacteria orders were negatively correlated with these metabolites (Figure S3h). At the family level, a significant decrease in Muribaculaceae, along with reduced abundances of unidentified Eubacteriales and Lactobacillaceae, was positively correlated with several differential SCFAs, particularly butyric acid (Figure 3c). Increases in families such as Chthonomonadaceae, Sphingobacteriaceae, Lachnospiraceae and Oscillospiraceae were associated with negative correlations to SCFA levels (Figure 3c). At the genus and species levels, decreases in taxa such as Anaerofustis sp. Marseille‐P2832, Muribaculum intestinale and Christensenella minuta were significantly correlated with declines in several differential SCFAs. In contrast, increases in unidentified Lachnospiraceae, mouse gut metagenome, Acutalibacter muris and Pasteurellaceae bacterium were negatively correlated with these metabolites (Figure 3d). These findings indicate a profound disruption in both the composition and functional capacity of the gut microbiota in cachexia, characterized by a marked decline in SCFA levels, particularly BA. The strong correlation between Muribaculaceae and BA levels, as well as between Muribaculum intestinale and BA levels highlights the significance of these bacteria in SCFA production. Interestingly, MI supplementation in two cachectic mouse models led to significant changes in faecal SCFA profiles, particularly an increase in butyrate levels (Figure 3e, 3f). These results suggest that Muribaculum intestinale may be pivotal in modulating the host butyrate concentrations.

Decreased short‐chain fatty acids (SCFAs) levels in the faecal samples of cachexia mice correlate positively withabundance. (a) Percentage changes of SCFAs in the cachexia group compared to the control group. (b) Bubble chart showing pathway enrichment of altered metabolites in the muscle of C26 cachexia mice. (c) The correlation heatmap at the family level. (d) The correlation heatmap at the genus and species level (= 6). (e,f) The heatmaps showing the SCFAs changes with MI supplementation in C26 cachectic mice (e) and LLC cachectic mice (f) (= 3). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Spearman's correlation analysis was used. Statistical significance: *< 0.05; **< 0.01. Muribaculaceae n n p p
Sodium Butyrate Supplementation Mitigates Cachexia Symptoms and Suppresses Muscle Degradation
Given the depletion of SCFAs, especially BA, in cachexia, we explored the therapeutic effects of sodium butyrate (NaB) supplementation in the C26 cachexia model (Figure 4a). Treatment resulted in amelioration of the cachexia phenotype, including reduced body weight loss (Figure S4a). Although on Day 13, there was an upward trend in body weight in the CNaB group of mice, no significant difference was observed compared to Day 8 (Figure S4b) or the NaB control group on Day 13 (Figure S4c). Lean body mass and hindlimb muscle were preserved (Figures 4b and S4d), despite a reduction in tumour weight (Figure S4e). Molecular analyses demonstrated reduced mRNA levels of atrophy markers Fbxo32 and Murf1 in NaB‐treated cachectic mice (Figure 4c). Western blotting confirmed decreased protein expression of the cachexia‐specific markers Atrogin‐1 and MuRF1 (Figures 4d and S4f), suggesting effective alleviation of muscle atrophy. H&E staining showed increased CSA of muscle fibres and adipose tissues in NaB‐treated cachectic mice, indicating a reduction in tissue degradation (Figures 4e and S4g). In the LLC cachexia mouse model, NaB supplementation increased the muscle fibre CSA (Figure S4h) and suppressed muscle atrophy markers (Figure S4i, S4j). Unlike the C26 model, tumour weight remained unchanged in the LLC model with NaB treatment (Figure S4k, S4l), suggesting that its effects on tumorigenesis may vary between cachexia models.
We also validated this in the C2C12 myotube. NaB treatment decreased atrophy markers (Figure 5a–5c) and protected myotubes from C26 conditional medium, as shown by immunofluorescence (Figure 5d). The protective effect was consistent when myotubes were treated with LLC conditional medium, showing a notable decrease in Murf1 expression (Figure 5e) and protection against myotube shrinkage (Figure 5f). The findings show that NaB not only reduces cachexia‐related muscle and fat loss in vivo, but also directly affects muscle atrophy pathways.

Sodium butyrate supplementation alleviates weight loss and suppresses muscle degradation in cachexia mice. (a) Schematic of sodium butyrate (NaB) supplementation in cachexia mice. (b) Weights of lean mass and hind limb muscle changes in NaB‐supplemented mice (= 5). (c) Relative mRNA expression ofandin muscle with NaB supplementation (= 5). (d) The protein expression of Atrogin‐1, MuRF1 in muscle of NaB‐supplemented mice, with statistics analysis is shown on the right panel. (e) H&E staining of the quadriceps muscle shows the effect of NaB supplementation on muscle, with statistical analysis shown on the right. The scale bar represents 100 μm. The data are presented as the average ± SEM. One‐way ANOVA was used. Statistical significance: *< 0.05; **< 0.01; ****< 0.0001. n Murf1 Fbxo32 n p p p

Sodium butyrate can improve cachexia‐induced myotube atrophy(a) Relative mRNA expression ofandin C2C12 myotubes with NaB treatment (= 3). (b) Protein expression of Atrogin‐1, MuRF1 in C2C12 myotubes treated with NaB. (c) The statistics analysis of Figure(= 4). (d) Immunofluorescence staining of MyHC in the C26 cachexia cell model with NaB treatment, and quantitative analysis of myotube diameter on the right panel, the scale bar represents 50 μm. (e) Relative mRNA expression ofin myotubes in the LLC cachexia model treated with NaB (3). (f) Immunofluorescence staining of MyHC in the LLC cachexia cell model with NaB treatment, and quantitative analysis of myotube diameter on the right panel, the scale bar represents 50 μm. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. One‐way ANOVA was used. Statistical significance: *< 0.05; **< 0.01; ****< 0.0001. in vitro . Fbxo32 Murf1 n n Murf1 n p p p 5b =
Sodium Butyrate Induces Transcriptomic Shifts That Counteract Cachexia‐Associated Muscle Atrophy Pathways
To clarify NaB's role in alleviating cachexia‐associated muscle atrophy, we performed RNA‐Seq on quadriceps muscle. PCA showed the NaB‐treated group's gene expression was closer to normal controls than the untreated group (Figure S5a). The heatmap revealed significant gene expression differences among groups, indicating substantial transcriptomic changes from NaB (Figure S5b). NaB downregulated key atrophy‐related genes like Trim63, Fbxo32, Acot1, Acot2, Pdk4 and Il6ra (Figure 6a), which are typically upregulated in cachectic muscle (Figure S5c), suggesting a direct impact on muscle preservation. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis showed that in the cachexia group, pathways such as mitophagy and FoxO signalling were upregulated, while glycolysis and glycine, serine and threonine metabolism were downregulated (Figure S5d). Remarkably, NaB reversed these trends by reducing activity in autophagy‐related pathways and enhancing pathways associated with arginine and proline metabolism, as well as glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis (Figure 6b). Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis revealed significant alterations in biological processes, including the regulation of nervous system development, axon growth and wound response, underscoring the extensive systemic impact of NaB (Figure S5e). Regarding cellular components and molecular functions, there was notable enrichment in extracellular matrix structures and calcium ion binding activities, among other aspects (Figure S5f,S5g). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) showed that in cachexia, TNF‐α, inflammatory and JAK‐STAT3 pathways were upregulated, and myogenesis pathways were downregulated (Figure S5h). NaB significantly suppressed TNF‐α and inflammatory pathways, mildly affected the JAK‐STAT3 pathway, and enhanced muscle generation pathways (Figure 6c). It also activated oxidative phosphorylation (Figure 6d). These findings were associated with coordinated transcriptional changes, including the downregulation of Pdk4 (Figure 6e) and autophagy‐related genes (Figures 6f and S5i), collectively highlighting NaB's multifaceted modulation of inflammatory signalling and energy metabolic rewiring in cachectic muscle.

Muscle RNA‐Seq demonstrated that sodium butyrate treatment can affect the expression levels of multiple genes in cachexia skeletal muscle samples. (a) Volcano plot showing the significantly changed genes with NaB treatment; the orange is upregulated genes in the CNaB group and the purple is the downregulated genes in the same group. (b) KEGG pathway analysis showing the most featured pathway enrichment in the CNaB and C26 groups. (c) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of TNF‐signalling, inflammatory response, IL‐6‐JAK‐STAT3 signalling and myogenesis in the CNaB and C26 groups. (d) GSEA of oxidative phosphorylation. (e) The representative ofmRNA expression in three groups. (f) Analysis of autophagy‐related genes in mouse muscles in three groups (−rpkm) (= 3). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. One‐way ANOVA was used. Statistical significance: *< 0.05; **< 0.01; ***< 0.001. α Pdk4 n p p p
Sodium Butyrate Suppresses STAT3 Signalling and Autophagy, Supporting Transcriptomic Findings
To validate key findings, we investigated NaB's effects on inflammation and autophagy signalling, both implicated in cachexia‐induced muscle wasting. Western blotting results revealed a significant reduction in p‐STAT3 levels in cachectic mice's skeletal muscles and myotubes treated with NaB (Figure 7a). qPCR analysis revealed that NaB reduced the elevation of Il6 mRNA levels in myotubes induced by C26 and LLC conditional medium (Figure 7b). The multiplex assay kit assessed plasma inflammatory cytokines in both cachexia mouse models. In the C26 model, NaB significantly reduced TNF‐α, IL‐6, IL‐1β and MCP‐1 (Figure S6a–S6d). In the LLC model, IL‐6 and MCP‐1 decreased, but TNF‐α and IL‐1β showed no significant change (Figure S6e–S6h). These findings indicate that NaB can mitigate cachexia‐associated systemic inflammation.
Further qPCR analysis showed that NaB treatment significantly downregulated mRNA levels of autophagy and mitophagy‐specific genes, indicating reduced catabolic activity (Figure 7c). Western blotting confirmed this finding, showing a decreased LC3 II/I ratio and reduced autophagy activity in muscle tissues (Figure 7d). The qPCR results showed a significant decrease in Pdk4, which is involved in inhibiting oxidative phosphorylation (Figures 7e and S6i). Interestingly, in the previous experiment, MI supplementation led to increased butyrate levels (Figure 3e,3f), and qPCR analysis of muscle samples from cachectic mice supplemented with MI showed significant suppression of Pdk4 expression (Figure S6j), similar to direct NaB supplementation. Increased ATP content confirmed the enhancement of oxidative phosphorylation in muscles following NaB treatment (Figure 7f).

Experimental validation of the transcriptomic data results. (a) Protein expression of pSTAT3 in different cachexia models treated with NaB. (b) Relative mRNA expression ofin C2C12 myotubes with NaB treatment (= 3). (c) Relative mRNA expression of autophagy and mitophagy‐related genes in each group (= 4). (d) Protein expression of LC3 in C2C12 myotubes with NaB treatment. (e) Relative mRNA expression ofexpression in muscle with NaB treatment (= 5). (f) ATP quantification in C26 cachectic mice with NaB treatment (= 3). The data are represented as the mean± SEM. One‐way ANOVA was used. Statistical significance: ns means no significance, *< 0.05; **< 0.01; ***< 0.001; ****< 0.0001. Il6 n n Pdk4 n n p p p p
Inulin Supplementation Rebalances Gut Microbiota and Mitigates Cancer Cachexia
Regarding clinical application potential, inulin might have an advantage in safety, transport and patient agreement. Thus, we employed an inulin fructan‐enriched prebiotic diet that is known to increase the abundance of Muribaculaceae [15, 23]. To expand the protective effect against cancer cachexia, we administered an inulin fructan‐enriched diet to the cachexia model mice (Figure S7a). 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing revealed that inulin supplementation improved cachexia‐associated microbial dysbiosis (Figure S7b). At the phylum level, Firmicutes in cachectic mice decreased following inulin intervention, while the proportion of Bacteroidota increased (Figure S7c). At the class level, Bacteroidia and Clostridia showed an upward trend (Figure S7d). At the order level, Bacteroidales and Lachnospirales also increased (Figure S7e). At the family level, Muribaculaceae increased significantly (Figures S7f and 8a). At the species level, Muribaculum intestinale increased significantly (Figure 8b). These changes suggest that inulin may improve gut microbiota balance in cachexia, benefiting intestinal health.
The prebiotic intervention notably improved the cachexia phenotype, including reduced body weight loss (Figure S7g), preserving lean mass (Figure 8c) and quadriceps muscles (Figure S7h) and hindlimb muscle (Figure S7l). Importantly, these benefits occurred without altering tumour weight (Figure S7i), adipose tissue mass (Figure S7j, S7l) and heart weight (Figure S7k), possibly indicating muscle‐specific effects. H&E staining showed increased muscle fibre CSA in the quadriceps (Figure 8d), with no significant change in adipose tissue CSA (Figure S7m), indicating an effective counteraction of muscle atrophy by the inulin diet. Then qPCR of muscle RNA showed reduced expression of Fbxo32 and Murf1 in the cachexia model mice fed the inulin diet (Figure 8e). Western blotting confirmed decreased protein levels of Atrogin‐1 and MuRF1, and a reduced LC3II/I ratio (Figure 8f). These results indicate that inulin effectively normalized gut microbiota composition, enhanced Muribaculaceae and Muribaculum intestinale abundance and significantly improved key cachexia markers.

Supplementation with inulin restored intestinal microbiota stability, enhancedabundance, and ameliorated cancer cachexia. (a,b) The abundance ofandin each group (= 6). (c) Weight of lean mass showing the changes in inulin‐supplemented mice (= 6). (d) H&E staining of quadriceps muscle showing the effect of inulin supplementation on muscle, the statistics analysis is shown on the right panel. The scale bar represents 100 μm. (e) Relative mRNA expression ofandin muscle from each group (= 6). (f) The corresponding protein expression and the statistics analysis of Atrogin‐1, MuRF1 and LC3 in the muscle of inulin‐supplemented mice. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. One‐way ANOVA was used. Statistical significance: ns means no significance, *< 0.05; **< 0.01; ***< 0.001; ****< 0.0001. Muribaculaceae f_Muribaculaceae s_Muribaculum intestinale n n Murf1 Fbxo32 n p p p p
Discussion
Cachexia is a complex metabolic syndrome with multifaceted organ changes, accompanied by gut microbiota dysbiosis and significant metabolic abnormalities [2, 3]. While research on specific microbes' impact on muscle function in cachexia is limited [5]. Our study reveals a notable reduction in Muribaculaceae and Muribaculum intestinale in cachexia mouse models. Direct MI supplementation enhances its gut presence and alleviates cachexia symptoms and increases the levels of butyrate in the faeces of mice, linking Muribaculaceae and butyrate [9, 25]. NaB also reduced muscle and fat wasting in cachexia, underscoring the importance of gut microbiota and its metabolites. Inulin increases these gut bacteria and ameliorates the cachexia phenotype. These findings emphasize the gut microbiota's importance in cachexia and offer new treatment strategies through microbiota modulation (Figure S8).
In two cancer cachexia mouse models, we observed significant gut microbiota changes, notably reduced Muribaculaceae abundance, with Muribaculum intestinale as the key species. These findings are supported by studies showing a significant drop in Muribaculaceae in sarcopenia patients, underscoring its potential key role in muscle dysfunction diseases [10]. The consistent findings suggest that the Muribaculaceae family and Muribaculum intestinale could be crucial for muscle health regulation. In cachectic mice, we observed increased Firmicutes phylum abundance alongside decreased Bacteroidetes phylum levels. While early obesity studies emphasized phylum‐level compositional shifts (e.g., increase in Firmicutes and a decrease in Bacteroidota [26]), subsequent research revealed contradictory trends [27], and recent critiques highlight the limited biological relevance of such broad taxonomic ratios given phylum‐level functional heterogeneity [28]. Notably, Muribaculaceae (Bacteroidetes phylum) depletion may exhibit stronger associations with cachectic phenotypes than phylum‐level changes. In db/db mice, reduced Bacteroidetes abundance correlated with muscle weakness [29], paralleling our findings and cancer cachexia reports of Firmicutes dominance [3]. This emphasizes the need to further explore the gut microbiota's role in cachexia and its modulation to improve cachexia.
Butyrate, produced by gut microbiota, supplies energy to intestinal epithelial cells and enhances intestinal barrier function by lowering intracellular oxygen levels [30]. It also has systemic anti‐inflammatory effects when absorbed after oral administration [31, 32]. Pötgens et al. found decreased acetate and butyrate in the C26 model [33]. Transcriptome data showed no significant IL‐6‐STAT3 suppression by NaB, but experiments confirmed its inhibition in muscles. Interestingly, in the muscles of mice treated with MI and NaB, the mRNA levels of Pdk4 were significantly decreased. Although the critical role of PDK4 in muscle atrophy has been supported by multiple independent studies [34, 35], where elevated PDK4 expression positively correlates with muscle wasting and its inhibition ameliorates atrophy, this study has not yet directly validated the causal relationship through genetic knockout/overexpression experiments. These findings suggest that the improvement of cachexia‐induced muscle atrophy by MI and butyrate may potentially involve PDK4 suppression, but this mechanistic link requires further experimental confirmation in follow‐up studies.
Although NaB inhibited tumour growth in the C26 cachexia model, it had no significant effect on tumour growth in the LLC model, indicating that its protective effects against cachexia are not dependent on its anticancer properties (Figure S4l,S4m). In other studies, NaB modulates muscle satellite cells by altering DNA methylation, reducing antibiotic‐induced activation and loss during regeneration [36, 37]. It also enhances muscle mass and function in sarcopenia by inhibiting FoxO3a/Atrogin‐1 and activating mTOR [38]. These insights support butyrate's role in mitigating cancer‐related cachexia muscle atrophy.
Prebiotics' health benefits have been widely studied [12]. Bindels et al. showed that pectin oligosaccharides and inulin protected leukaemia mice's fat and muscle in a Bcr‐Abl‐transfected proB lymphocyte model [39], but the specific mechanisms were unclear. Our research provided an extension to Bindels's findings. While inulin is reported to have antitumor effects [40], our data did not show significant change, likely due to their heterogeneity (Figure S7i). In this process, inulin‐mediated alleviation of cachexia may be related to Muribaculaceae and its butyrate metabolism improvement [9]. Inulin modulated the Muribaculaceae family and positively impacted other bacterial communities, like Prevotellaceae, Bacteroidales and Lachnospirales, which may synergize to combat muscle atrophy.
Our study advances understanding of the gut microbiome–muscle health nexus but has limitations. The gut microbiome–muscle interaction mechanisms require further investigation of molecular pathways. Although dietary inulin increased the abundance of specific commensal bacteria, such as the Muribaculaceae family, its clinical efficacy needs validation. Moreover, prebiotic metabolic effects likely involve complex microbial networks, not just individual species. Clarifying these interactions is crucial for maintaining gut homeostasis and health.
In conclusion, our findings reveal that a high‐fibre diet enhances gut microbiota stability, enriches beneficial bacteria such as Muribaculaceae and Muribaculum intestinale, and boosts butyrate levels, potentially mitigating inflammation and metabolic disorders in mouse muscle and improving cancer cachexia.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting Information
Additional supporting information can be found online in thesection at the end of the article. Supporting Information