Discovery of circadian rhythm-related hub genes in acute myocardial infarction: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study

📖 Top 50% JournalJan 21, 2026Medicine

Key daily rhythm genes linked to sudden heart attack risk

AI simplified

Abstract

Five associated with circadian rhythms—four risk factors and one protective factor—were identified in relation to acute myocardial infarction.

  • NR1H3, SREBF1, SIRT1, and HIF1A were identified as risk factors for acute myocardial infarction, with odds ratios slightly above 1.
  • NCOA1 was found to be a protective factor against acute myocardial infarction, with an odds ratio slightly below 1.
  • The expression levels of HIF1A, NCOA1, and SREBF1 were highest in neutrophils compared to other immune cells.
  • HIF1A and SREBF1 exhibited higher expression levels in heart and artery tissues.
  • The transcription factor NFKB1 may regulate the hub genes, except for NCOA1.

AI simplified

Key numbers

1.0009
Risk Factor Odds Ratio for NR1H3
Odds ratio (OR) for NR1H3 in patients
0.9984
Protective Factor Odds Ratio for NCOA1
Odds ratio (OR) for NCOA1 in patients
222
Total SNPs Selected for Analysis
Independent SNPs selected as instrumental variables

Key figures

Figure 1.
Correlation of 5 circadian rhythm-related genes with risk
Highlights contrasting genetic effects on myocardial infarction risk with one gene showing protective association
medi-105-e47228-g001
  • Panel A
    Scatter plot of effects on NR1H3 versus acute myocardial infarction showing positive correlation lines from multiple methods
  • Panel B
    Scatter plot of SNP effects on SREBF1 versus acute myocardial infarction with positive correlation lines from different Mendelian randomization methods
  • Panel C
    Scatter plot of SNP effects on NCOA1 versus acute myocardial infarction showing negative correlation lines from Mendelian randomization methods
  • Panel D
    Scatter plot of SNP effects on SIRT1 versus acute myocardial infarction with positive correlation lines from multiple Mendelian randomization methods
  • Panel E
    Scatter plot of SNP effects on HIF1A versus acute myocardial infarction showing positive correlation lines from Mendelian randomization methods
Figure 2.
Risk estimates of five circadian rhythm-related genes for .
Highlights subtle but consistent risk increases in four genes and a protective effect in one gene for AMI.
medi-105-e47228-g002
  • Panel A
    effect sizes for NR1H3 gene variants with AMI risk; most points cluster near zero with some positive effect sizes.
  • Panel B
    MR effect sizes for NCOA1 gene variants with AMI risk; points mostly near zero, with one variant showing a slight negative effect.
  • Panel C
    MR effect sizes for SIRT1 gene variants with AMI risk; points cluster near zero with a small positive effect size.
  • Panel D
    MR effect sizes for SREBF1 gene variants with AMI risk; points mostly positive, indicating increased risk.
  • Panel E
    MR effect sizes for HIF1A gene variants with AMI risk; points show small positive effect sizes.
Figure 3.
Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses of five affecting risk
Frames the robustness of genetic associations by showing consistent variant effects across five key genes linked to acute myocardial infarction
medi-105-e47228-g003
  • Panel A
    Leave-one-out analysis for gene NR1H3 showing individual variant effects on acute myocardial infarction risk with confidence intervals
  • Panel B
    Leave-one-out analysis for gene SREBF1 showing individual variant effects on acute myocardial infarction risk with confidence intervals
  • Panel C
    Leave-one-out analysis for gene SIRT1 showing individual variant effects on acute myocardial infarction risk with confidence intervals
  • Panel D
    Leave-one-out analysis for gene HIF1A showing individual variant effects on acute myocardial infarction risk with confidence intervals
  • Panel E
    Leave-one-out analysis for gene NCOA1 showing individual variant effects on acute myocardial infarction risk with confidence intervals
Figure 4.
in gene ontology categories and pathways related to
Highlights key biological processes and pathways linked to hub genes that relate to acute myocardial infarction risk
medi-105-e47228-g004
  • Panel A
    Biological processes including regulation of lipid storage, fatty acid metabolic process, , and intracellular receptor signaling pathway
  • Panel B
    Cellular components such as euchromatin, heterochromatin, nuclear envelope, ER to Golgi transport vesicle membrane, and neuron projection cytoplasm
  • Panel C
    Molecular functions including DNA-binding transcription factor binding, nuclear receptor activity, p53 binding, and transcription coregulator binding
  • Panel D
    KEGG pathways like , alcohol liver disease, insulin resistance, longevity regulating pathway, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
Figure 5.
Localization and expression of five in chromosomes, cells, and tissues
Highlights distinct cellular locations and tissue expression patterns of hub genes linked to
medi-105-e47228-g005
  • Panel A
    Chromosome locations of the five hub genes NR1H3, SREBF1, HIF1A, NCOA1, and SIRT1 are shown on a circular chromosome map
  • Panel B
    Percentage distribution of the five hub genes across cell compartments: nucleus, cytoplasm, , extracellular region, and mitochondria; nucleus is visibly the largest compartment for SIRT1 and NR1H3
  • Panel C
    Expression levels of the five hub genes in various tissues including whole blood, heart (left ventricle and atrial appendage), artery (aorta, tibial, coronary), and , with HIF1A and SIRT1 showing higher expression in heart tissues
1 / 5

Full Text

What this is

  • This research investigates the role of circadian rhythm-related genes (CRRGs) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
  • Using a two-sample (TSMR) approach, the study identifies key genes associated with AMI risk.
  • The findings suggest potential therapeutic targets and highlight the importance of circadian rhythms in cardiovascular health.

Essence

  • Five were identified that influence the occurrence of acute myocardial infarction: four risk factors (NR1H3, SREBF1, SIRT1, HIF1A) and one protective factor (NCOA1). These genes are involved in lipid metabolism and inflammatory responses, which are critical in AMI development.

Key takeaways

  • NR1H3, SREBF1, SIRT1, and HIF1A are risk factors for AMI, while NCOA1 acts as a protective factor. Their associations with AMI were statistically significant, indicating their potential roles in cardiovascular disease mechanisms.
  • The study found that were enriched in various biological processes and pathways, including lipid metabolism and inflammatory responses, suggesting they may be key players in AMI development.
  • High expression levels of HIF1A, NCOA1, and SREBF1 were observed in neutrophils, while NR1H3 and SIRT1 showed higher expression in specific immune cells, highlighting their potential as biomarkers for AMI.

Caveats

  • The study relies on bioinformatics analysis, lacking experimental validation from wet-lab experiments. This limits the strength of the conclusions drawn.
  • The effect sizes of the identified genes on AMI are relatively small, which may be influenced by gene-environment interactions or polygenic effects.
  • The findings are based on European population data, which may not be generalizable to other populations, particularly those with different genetic backgrounds.

Definitions

  • Mendelian randomization: A method that uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to assess causal relationships between risk factors and outcomes.
  • hub genes: Key genes identified in the study that significantly influence the risk of acute myocardial infarction.

AI simplified