What this is
- This study examines the association between () and () and liver fibrosis using NHANES data from 2017 to 2020.
- is characterized by multiple health issues related to metabolic dysfunctions and is linked to disruptions in circadian rhythms.
- The analysis includes 2597 participants, focusing on how correlates with liver conditions, particularly in younger adults and those with diabetes.
Essence
- is significantly associated with both and liver fibrosis in U.S. adults, particularly in those under 60 years and with diabetes.
Key takeaways
- shows a strong association with , with an odds ratio of 4.85 (95% CI: 3.99β5.89). This indicates that individuals with are much more likely to have compared to those without.
- The odds ratio for liver fibrosis in the group is 1.73 (95% CI: 1.29β2.34), suggesting that is also linked to an increased risk of liver fibrosis.
- Younger participants (<60 years) exhibit a stronger association between and both and liver fibrosis, highlighting a potential high-risk group for these conditions.
Caveats
- The cross-sectional design limits the ability to establish causation between and liver conditions, necessitating further longitudinal studies.
- The study's reliance on NHANES data may restrict the inclusion of all potential confounding factors affecting and liver fibrosis.
Definitions
- circadian syndrome (CircS): A condition characterized by at least four persistent health issues, including metabolic disorders and sleep disturbances.
- nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): A liver condition characterized by excess fat accumulation in the liver without significant alcohol consumption.
AI simplified
1. Introduction
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), affecting approximately 25% of the global population, is a persistent liver disorder strongly associated with metabolic dysfunctions.NAFLD can progress to liver fibrosis, and although liver biopsy is currently considered the most definitive method for diagnosing both conditions, its invasive nature makes it unsuitable for repeated use within a short timeframe, posing significant limitations in clinical practice.Liver ultrasound transient elastography (LUTE) offers a noninvasive technique to quantify liver steatosis and fibrosis, frequently serving as a standard tool for monitoring therapeutic outcomes and tracking disease progression. [,] 1 2 [,] 3 4 [] 5
The circadian rhythm is a biological process regulated by light/dark cycles, typically following a 24-hour cycle in humans. It governs sleep, mood, feeding, metabolism, immunity, and nearly all other physiological processes, allowing the body to maintain rhythmic behaviors even in the absence of light.Circadian rhythm disruption occurs when the bodyβs internal biological clock is desynchronized, often caused by changes in light exposure or behavioral shifts such as shift work or jet lag.These disturbances can disrupt cellular functions at the molecular level, leading to metabolic dysregulation and the development of metabolic diseases.Research using animal models has demonstrated that disturbances in circadian rhythms contribute to the development of insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance, obesity, and NAFLD.Clinically, NAFLD is often associated with irregular sleep patterns, shift work, jet lag, and insufficient sleep. [] 6 [] 7 [,] 8 9 [] 10 [,] 11 12
Circadian syndrome (CircS) is defined by the presence of at least 4 persistent health issues, such as lipid metabolism disorders, depression, abdominal obesity, hypertension, reduced sleep duration, and diabetes.Although our knowledge of circadian rhythm-related health problems has expanded, no previous studies have explored the relationships of CircS with NAFLD and liver fibrosis. [] 13
To better understand the potential association of CircS with NAFLD and liver fibrosis, we analyzed data from multiple cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). This research aims to provide fresh insights into the management and treatment of NAFLD and liver fibrosis.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Data source
This study is a cross-sectional analysis, utilizing data from the NHANES database for the period 2017 to 2020.03. The NHANES database provides a representative reflection of the health and nutritional status of the U.S. population, with all participants having provided written informed consent. Since the NHANES database is publicly available, ethical review for this study was waived.
2.2. The study cohort
A total of 15,560 participants were surveyed. We excluded those under 20 years of age (nβ =β 6328), those without CircS information (nβ =β 5945), and those who did not undergo LUTE testing (nβ =β 163). We also excluded participants with hepatitis B or C (nβ =β 90), autoimmune hepatitis (nβ =β 4), heavy alcohol use(malesβ >β 30βg/day, femalesβ >β 20βg/day, nβ =β 366), and those with unreliable liver stiffness measurements (LSM interquartile range/median ratio of β₯30%, nβ =β 65). The final sample included 2597 participants, as outlined in Figure. [] 14 1

Flowchart of participants selection from NHANES 2017 to 2020.03.
2.3. Study variables
2.3.1. NAFLD and liver fibrosis (dependent variables)
Following previous studies,a median controlled attenuation parameter value of β₯274 dB/m was utilized as a marker for hepatic steatosis, while a median LSM value of β₯8.0 kPa indicated liver fibrosis (β₯F2). Participants included in the analysis were limited to those with reliable LUTE tests, defined as an LSM interquartile range/median ratio of <30%. [,] 15 16
2.3.2. CircS (exposure variable)
The diagnostic criteria for CircS required meeting at least 4 of the following: waist circumference β₯88βcm for women or β₯102βcm for men; triglycerides β₯150βmg/dL or lipid-lowering medication use; HDL-C <40βmg/dL for men or <50βmg/dL for women, or lipid-lowering treatment; systolic BP β₯130βmm Hg, diastolic BP β₯85βmm Hg, or antihypertensive medication use; fasting glucose β₯100βmg/dL or diabetes medication use; sleep duration β€6βh/d; depressive symptoms, indicated by a Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score β₯10.
2.4. Covariates
Drawing from previous studies, we accounted for potential confounding variables in our multivariable adjustment models.Demographic information included age, gender, race/ethnicity, income-to-poverty ratio (PIR), marital status, and educational level. Clinical data included C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum ferritin. The questionnaire covered smoking status (defined as having smoked at least 100 cigarettes in oneβs lifetime) and diabetes status. Dietary information included energy intake, sugar intake, fat intake, and water intake. [β] 17 19
2.5. Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were weighted following NHANES analytic guidelines, and multiple imputation was applied to address missing covariate data. Baseline characteristics were presented as meanβ Β±β standard deviation for continuous variables and frequency (percentage) for categorical variables. Linear regression was used to compare continuous variables, while categorical variables were compared using Chi-square tests. To evaluate the association of CircS with NAFLD and liver fibrosis, 3 multivariable logistic regression models were implemented: Model 1 was unadjusted, Model 2 accounted for age, sex, race, education, PIR, and marital status, and Model 3 included additional adjustments for CRP, ferritin, smoking status, diabetes, and intake of energy, sugar, fat, and water. Two-sided<β .05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. All analyses were performed using R (version 4.2; The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, The R Project, Vienna, Austria) or EmpowerStats (version 5.0; X&Y Solutions, Milford). P
3. Results
3.1. Participant characteristics
In total, 2597 individuals from the NHANES 2017 to 2020.03 cycle were selected for the analysis. The majority of baseline characteristics demonstrated statistically significant variations across groups based on the presence of CircS. As shown in Table, the prevalence of NAFLD and liver fibrosis was elevated in patients with CircS, at 71.38% and 16.64%, respectively. Furthermore, these individuals were more likely to be female (56.77%) and tended to have higher educational attainment (76.83%), along with elevated serum ferritin levels (174.80β Β±β 198.61βng/mL), and CRP concentrations (5.44β Β±β 7.80βmg/L). Compared to those non-CircS, individuals with CircS were older (50.36β Β±β 17.19 years), had lower income levels (2.38β Β±β 1.53), and were more likely to be smokers (47.12%) and have diabetes (32.19%). Additionally, Tablesandillustrate that the prevalence of CircS was notably higher among participants diagnosed with NAFLD and liver fibrosis. 1 2 3
| Characteristics | Overall | Non-circadian syndrome | Circadian syndrome | -valueP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| nβ = 2597 | nβ =β 1954 | nβ =β 643 | ||
| Age (yr) | 50.36β Β±β 17.19 | 48.78β Β±β 17.56 | 55.14β Β±β 15.05 | <.001 |
| <60 (%) | 64.57 | 67.35 | 56.14 | |
| β₯60 (%) | 35.43 | 32.65 | 43.86 | |
| Gender (%) | <.001 | |||
| Male | 48.98 | 50.87 | 43.23 | |
| Female | 51.02 | 49.13 | 56.77 | |
| Race (%) | 0.016 | |||
| Mexican American | 13.95 | 12.54 | 14.62 | |
| Other Hispanic | 10.63 | 10.08 | 12.29 | |
| Non-Hispanic White | 33.73 | 32.91 | 36.24 | |
| Non-Hispanic Black | 24.87 | 25.79 | 22.08 | |
| Other races | 17.71 | 18.68 | 14.77 | |
| Education (%) | <.001 | |||
| Less than high school | 18.17 | 16.53 | 23.17 | |
| High school and above | 81.83 | 83.47 | 76.83 | |
| PIR | 2.62β Β±β 1.61 | 2.70β Β±β 1.63 | 2.38β Β±β 1.53 | <.001 |
| <1.3 (%) | 26.26 | 24.92 | 30.33 | |
| 1.3β3.5 (%) | 41.7 | 40.58 | 45.1 | |
| >3.5 (%) | 32.04 | 34.49 | 24.57 | |
| Marital status (%) | <.001 | |||
| Married/living with partner | 58.88 | 58.96 | 58.63 | |
| Widowed/divorced/separated | 21.95 | 20.11 | 27.53 | |
| Never married | 19.18 | 20.93 | 13.84 | |
| Smoking (%) | <.001 | |||
| Yes | 48.98 | 38.08 | 47.12 | |
| No | 51.02 | 61.92 | 52.88 | |
| Diabetes (%) | <.001 | |||
| Yes | 82.94 | 12.08 | 32.19 | |
| No | 17.06 | 87.92 | 67.81 | |
| Activity intensity (min) | 368.12β Β±β 659.13 | 346.85β Β±β 527.13 | 432.76β Β±β 951.81 | 0.014 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 4.08β Β±β 7.52 | 3.63β Β±β 7.37 | 5.44β Β±β 7.80 | <.001 |
| Ferritin (ng/mL) | 155.18β Β±β 169.09 | 148.72β Β±β 157.70 | 174.80β Β±β 198.61 | <.001 |
| Total daily energy intake (kcal) | 2032.69β Β±β 907.65 | 2044.25β Β±β 892.94 | 1997.58β Β±β 950.80 | 0.074 |
| Total daily sugar intake (g) | 103.94β Β±β 72.51 | 103.25β Β±β 70.51 | 106.06β Β±β 78.30 | 0.7 |
| Total daily fat intake (g) | 84.76β Β±β 45.96 | 85.37β Β±β 45.61 | 82.93β Β±β 46.99 | 0.11 |
| Total daily moisture intake (g) | 2777.65β Β±β 1469.32 | 2757.28β Β±β 1440.67 | 2839.55β Β±β 1552.68 | 0.29 |
| Stratified by CAP (%) | <.001 | |||
| <274 | 56.76 | 66.02 | 28.62 | |
| β₯274 | 43.24 | 33.98 | 71.38 | |
| Stratified by LSM (%) | <.001 | |||
| <8.0 (%) | 90.53 | 92.89 | 83.36 | |
| β₯8.0 (%) | 9.47 | 7.11 | 16.64 |
| Characteristics | Overall | CAPβ <β 274 | CAPβ β₯β 274 | -valueP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| nβ =β 2597 | nβ =β 1474 | nβ =β 1123 | ||
| Age (yr) | 50.36β Β±β 17.19 | 48.00β Β±β 17.75 | 53.45β Β±β 15.91 | <.001 |
| <60 (%) | 64.57 | 69.2 | 58.5 | |
| β₯60 (%) | 35.43 | 30.8 | 41.5 | |
| Gender (%) | <.001 | |||
| Male | 48.98 | 45.93 | 52.98 | |
| Female | 51.02 | 54.07 | 47.02 | |
| Race (%) | <.001 | |||
| Mexican American | 13.95 | 9.7 | 17.45 | |
| Other Hispanic | 10.63 | 10.92 | 10.24 | |
| Non-Hispanic White | 33.73 | 31.89 | 36.15 | |
| Non-Hispanic Black | 24.87 | 28.56 | 20.04 | |
| Other races | 17.71 | 18.93 | 16.12 | |
| Education (%) | 0.103 | |||
| Less than high school | 18.17 | 17.1 | 19.59 | |
| High school and above | 81.83 | 82.9 | 80.41 | |
| PIR | 2.62β Β±β 1.61 | 2.61β Β±β 1.62 | 2.63β Β±β 1.59 | 0.821 |
| <1.3 (%) | 26.26 | 26.66 | 25.73 | |
| 1.3β3.5 (%) | 41.7 | 40.43 | 43.37 | |
| >3.5 (%) | 32.04 | 32.9 | 30.9 | |
| Marital status (%) | <.001 | |||
| Married/living with partner | 58.88 | 54.21 | 65 | |
| Widowed/divorced/separated | 21.95 | 22.8 | 20.84 | |
| Never married | 19.18 | 23 | 14.16 | |
| Smoking (%) | 0.009 | |||
| Yes | 48.98 | 38.13 | 43.19 | |
| No | 51.02 | 61.87 | 56.81 | |
| Diabetes (%) | <.001 | |||
| Yes | 82.94 | 9.57 | 26.89 | |
| No | 17.06 | 80.43 | 73.11 | |
| Activity intensity (min) | 368.12β Β±β 659.13 | 356.23β Β±β 646.66 | 383.73β Β±β 675.13 | 0.005 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 4.08β Β±β 7.52 | 3.36β Β±β 7.07 | 5.01β Β±β 7.97 | <.001 |
| Ferritin (ng/mL) | 155.18β Β±β 169.09 | 140.40β Β±β 152.00 | 174.57β Β±β 187.51 | <.001 |
| Total daily energy intake (kcal) | 2032.69β Β±β 907.65 | 1998.89β Β±β 903.71 | 2077.05β Β±β 911.29 | 0.03 |
| Total daily sugar intake (g) | 103.94β Β±β 72.51 | 102.41β Β±β 71.40 | 105.96β Β±β 73.93 | 0.217 |
| Total daily fat intake (g) | 84.76β Β±β 45.96 | 82.95β Β±β 46.03 | 87.15β Β±β 45.78 | 0.021 |
| Total daily moisture intake (g) | 2777.65β Β±β 1469.32 | 2713.36β Β±β 1511.20 | 2862.03β Β±β 1408.68 | 0.011 |
| Circadian syndrome (%) | <.001 | |||
| Yes | 24.76 | 12.48 | 40.87 | |
| No | 75.24 | 87.52 | 59.13 |
| Characteristics | Overall | LSMβ <β 8.0 | LSMβ β₯β 8.0 | -valueP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| nβ =β 2597 | nβ =β 2351 | nβ =β 246 | ||
| Age (yr) | 50.36β Β±β 17.19 | 49.79β Β±β 17.24 | 55.74β Β±β 15.74 | <.001 |
| <60 (%) | 64.57 | 65.8 | 52.85 | |
| β₯60 (%) | 35.43 | 34.2 | 47.15 | |
| Gender (%) | 0.038 | |||
| Male | 48.98 | 48.32 | 55.28 | |
| Female | 51.02 | 51.68 | 44.72 | |
| Race (%) | 0.051 | |||
| Mexican American | 13.95 | 12.8 | 15.45 | |
| Other Hispanic | 10.63 | 10.63 | 10.57 | |
| Non-Hispanic White | 33.73 | 33.09 | 39.84 | |
| Non-Hispanic Black | 24.87 | 25.22 | 21.54 | |
| Other races | 17.71 | 18.25 | 12.6 | |
| Education (%) | 0.568 | |||
| Less than high school | 18.17 | 18.03 | 19.51 | |
| High school and above | 81.83 | 81.97 | 80.49 | |
| PIR | 2.62β Β±β 1.61 | 2.62β Β±β 1.61 | 2.57β Β±β 1.60 | 0.71 |
| <1.3 (%) | 26.26 | 26.41 | 24.8 | |
| 1.3β3.5 (%) | 41.7 | 41.17 | 46.75 | |
| >3.5 (%) | 32.04 | 32.41 | 28.46 | |
| Marital status (%) | 0.051 | |||
| Married/living with partner | 58.88 | 58.53 | 62.2 | |
| Widowed/divorced/separated | 21.95 | 21.69 | 24.39 | |
| Never married | 19.18 | 19.78 | 13.41 | |
| Smoking (%) | 0.18 | |||
| Yes | 48.98 | 39.9 | 44.31 | |
| No | 51.02 | 60.1 | 55.69 | |
| Diabetes (%) | <.001 | |||
| Yes | 82.94 | 14.16 | 44.72 | |
| No | 17.06 | 85.84 | 55.28 | |
| Activity intensity (min) | 368.12β Β±β 659.13 | 346.85β Β±β 527.13 | 432.76β Β±β 951.81 | 0.014 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 4.08β Β±β 7.52 | 3.63β Β±β 7.37 | 5.44β Β±β 7.80 | <.001 |
| Ferritin (ng/mL) | 155.18β Β±β 169.09 | 148.72β Β±β 157.70 | 174.80β Β±β 198.61 | <.001 |
| Total daily energy intake (kcal) | 2032.69β Β±β 907.65 | 2044.25β Β±β 892.94 | 1997.58β Β±β 950.80 | 0.074 |
| Total daily sugar intake (g) | 103.94β Β±β 72.51 | 103.25β Β±β 70.51 | 106.06β Β±β 78.30 | 0.7 |
| Total daily fat intake (g) | 84.76β Β±β 45.96 | 85.37β Β±β 45.61 | 82.93β Β±β 46.99 | 0.11 |
| Total daily moisture intake (g) | 2777.65β Β±β 1469.32 | 2757.28β Β±β 1440.67 | 2839.55β Β±β 1552.68 | 0.29 |
| Circadian syndrome (%) | <.001 | |||
| Yes | 24.76 | 22.8 | 43.5 | |
| No | 75.24 | 77.2 | 56.5 |
3.2. Logistic regression
As shown in Table, across all models, CircS was positively associated with NAFLD and liver fibrosis. The odds ratio for NAFLD in the CircS group compared to the non-CircS group was 4.85 (95% CI: 3.99β5.89,<β .001), while the odds ratio for liver fibrosis was 1.73 (95% CI: 1.29β2.34,<β .001). In addition, except for the nonsignificant association between the β₯6 CircS component group and liver fibrosis in Model 3, all other analyses indicated a positive relationship between CircS components and NAFLD or liver fibrosis. 4 P P
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | -valueP | OR (95% CI) | -valueP | OR (95% CI) | -valueP | |
| NAFLD | ||||||
| Circadian syndrome | ||||||
| No | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Yes | 4.85 (3.99β5.89) | <.001 | 4.64 (4.28β5.04) | <.001 | 4.25 (3.44β5.24) | <.001 |
| Components of circadian syndrome | ||||||
| <4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4 | 3.42 (2.73β4.28) | <.001 | 3.31 (2.63β4.16) | <.001 | 2.99 (2.36β3.80) | <.001 |
| 5 | 5.01 (3.55β7.08) | <.001 | 4.92 (3.45β7.03) | <.001 | 4.21 (2.92β6.07) | <.001 |
| β₯6 | 3.71 (1.72β7.97) | <.001 | 3.40 (1.55β7.37) | 0.002 | 2.70 (1.18β6.16) | 0.019 |
| Liver fibrosis | ||||||
| Circadian syndrome | ||||||
| No | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Yes | 2.61 (1.99β3.41) | <.001 | 2.38 (2.13β2.66) | <.001 | 1.73 (1.29β2.34) | <.001 |
| Components of circadian syndrome | ||||||
| <4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4 | 1.96 (1.44β2.66) | <.001 | 1.79 (1.31β2.45) | <.001 | 1.43 (1.03β1.99) | 0.035 |
| 5 | 2.38 (1.61β3.51) | <.001 | 2.17 (1.46β3.23) | <.001 | 1.60 (1.04β2.44) | 0.031 |
| β₯6 | 3.01 (1.35β6.71) | 0.007 | 2.63 (1.16β5.96) | 0.021 | 1.52 (0.62β3.72) | 0.354 |
3.3. Subgroup and interaction analyses
In the subgroup analyses (Figs.and), we focused on age, sex, PIR, smoking status, and diabetes. CircS had a stronger positive association with NAFLD and liver fibrosis in younger participants (<60 years,=β .049;=β .004). Furthermore, a stronger association was observed between CircS and NAFLD among participants with diabetes (=β .002). No significant differences were observed in other subgroup analyses. 2 3 P P P

Subgroup and interaction analysis of the association between Circs and NAFLD. CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio; Circs = circadian syndrome; NAFLD = nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Statistical analysis was performed in Model 3.

Subgroup and interaction analysis of the association between Circs and liver fibrosis. CI = confidence interval; Circs = circadian syndrome; OR = odds ratio. Statistical analysis was performed in model.
4. Discussion
This cross-sectional study examined the associations of CircS with NAFLD and liver fibrosis, using data from the NHANES database covering 2017 to 2020.03. The findings suggest that CircS is significantly linked to an increased prevalence of NAFLD or liver fibrosis, especially among individuals younger than 60. Furthermore, the presence of diabetes intensified the connection between CircS and NAFLD.
The circadian rhythm system plays a critical role in maintaining metabolic health by regulating gut microbiota, hormones, and inflammation, which are vital for disease prevention and treatment.With the growing prevalence of modern lifestyle factors such as light pollution, shift work, and dietary changes, the impact of circadian rhythm disruption on health has become increasingly apparent.For example, shift workers with similar body mass index as daytime workers are more likely to develop metabolic disorders.CircS is a clinical syndrome characterized by circadian rhythm disruption and several associated chronic conditions, making it easier to apply in clinical practice. Previous research has found positive correlations between CircS and chronic diarrhea, kidney stones, frailty, and stroke. [β] 20 23 [β] 24 26 [] 27 [β] 28 31
The liver is a crucial metabolic organ, and its functions are closely tied to circadian rhythms. Circadian regulation ensures that liver metabolic activities are synchronized with physiological timing by modulating the expression of key metabolic enzymes and transcription factors. Many major liver functions, particularly those related to energy balance and nutrient metabolism, exhibit rhythmic fluctuations. For example, glucose transporters and glucagon receptors involved in glucose metabolism show rhythmic expression throughout the day.Similarly, key enzymes involved in lipid metabolism, such as glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase, exhibit circadian rhythmicity.In this study, we observed the association of CircS with NAFLD and liver fibrosis. However, the relationship between sleep duration and NAFLD or liver fibrosis remains controversial. Some studies have found that NAFLD patients experience poor sleep quality and delayed sleep onset,similar to findings in cirrhosis patients.A study by Um YJ et al, which followed 86,530 adults without baseline NAFLD or fibrosis over 3.6 years, found that reduced sleep duration or poor sleep quality increased the risk of developing NAFLD.Conversely, some studies have reported no significant association between sleep duration and the risk of NAFLD.This discrepancy may be because sleep duration, as part of CircS diagnosis, does not fully capture the complexity of circadian rhythm disruption. [,] 32 33 [] 34 [] 35 [] 36 [] 37 [] 38
The association between age and NAFLD has also been debated. For example, a retrospective study of 1509 NAFLD patients found a βU-shapedβ relationship between age and NAFLD prevalence, with a peak in men aged 40 to 49 and women aged 60 to 69.A meta-analysis on global NAFLD prevalence found that the rate increases continuously across all age groups from 30 to 79 years.Moreover, studies suggest that aging may accelerate the progression of liver fibrosis.In our subgroup analysis, we found that CircS was more strongly associated with NAFLD and liver fibrosis in participants younger than 60 years, possibly due to greater social stress, unhealthy dietary habits, and shift work.Additionally, we found a stronger correlation between CircS and NAFLD in participants with diabetes, consistent with previous findings. For instance, a cohort study of 18,503 participants reported that approximately 30% of diabetic patients also had NAFLD, highlighting the positive association between the 2. [] 39 [] 40 [] 41 [β] 42 44
This study has several notable strengths, such as the use of a large, nationally representative sample and a multistage random sampling approach, which improves the reliability and generalizability of the findings. To our knowledge, CircS, as a newly emerging concept related to metabolism, has not been previously examined in relation to NAFLD and liver fibrosis using a representative sample of U.S. adults. However, a few limitations should be acknowledged. The cross-sectional nature of the study prevents us from establishing causal relationships between CircS and NAFLD or liver fibrosis. Furthermore, the limitations of the NHANES database restricted our ability to include all potential factors that could influence NAFLD and liver fibrosis. Future research is necessary to confirm the causal links between CircS and these liver conditions.
5. Conclusion
In U.S. adults, CircS shows significant positive associations with both NAFLD and liver fibrosis. Our findings suggest that individuals under 60 years old and those with diabetes may represent high-risk populations requiring greater attention to liver health. However, as this is a cross-sectional study, these observed associations do not imply causation, and the potential bidirectional relationships between circadian dysfunction and liver diseases warrant further investigation through longitudinal studies.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank all participants in this study.
Author contributions
Guanhua Lv. Conceptualization:
Wenzhao Guo, Sijia Li. Investigation:
Wenzhao Guo, Yuhang Gao, Meng Mi. Writing β original draft:
Bingjiu Lu, Xinghai Yue, Wenting Zhao, Ran Zhao. Writing β review & editing: