British journal of anaesthesia

Effectiveness and safety of spinal versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery using agreed key outcomes and patient-informed measures

Updated

Abstract

Spinal anaesthesia is associated with a 59% lower risk of acute kidney injury compared to general anaesthesia in hip fracture surgery.

  • There was no significant difference in the risk of delirium between spinal anaesthesia and general anaesthesia.
  • Mortality rates were similar for spinal anaesthesia and general anaesthesia at various time points: in-hospital, 30 days, and 90 days.
  • Spinal anaesthesia reduced the risk of acute kidney injury compared to general anaesthesia.
  • Few studies reported outcomes defined by patient and public involvement, with most focusing on one to three core outcomes.
  • Overall, except for acute kidney injury, no differences were found between spinal and general anaesthesia regarding key outcomes.

Simplified

Full Text

We can’t show the full text here under this license.

what lands in your inbox each week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free