Dietary Restriction Depends on Nutrient Composition to Extend Chronological Lifespan in Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

May 22, 2013PloS one

Diet changes only extend yeast lifespan when nutrient balance is right

AI simplified

Abstract

Lifespan extension in yeast is influenced more by nutrient composition than by .

  • Changing the balance of dietary components without reducing intake can increase lifespan in yeast.
  • Different strains of yeast exhibited varying responses to nutrient composition regarding lifespan and biomass production.
  • The pH of aging media was influenced by glucose concentration but did not correlate with lifespan when amino acids and yeast nitrogen base were varied.
  • Buffering the pH of the media significantly extended lifespan.
  • The sch9Δ strain showed heightened sensitivity to nutrient changes, indicating its role in regulating growth and longevity.

AI simplified

Key numbers

17×
Increase in lifespan
Lifespan extension observed in yeast under optimized nutrient conditions.
4 of 15
production
production varied significantly across different nutrient media.

Key figures

Figure 1
levels and nutrient composition effects on yeast lifespan and production
Highlights how glucose and nutrient composition distinctly influence yeast lifespan and biomass under different media conditions.
pone.0064448.g001
  • Panels A, B, C
    Survival curves and area under curve () show 0.5% glucose extends lifespan most in SD media; biomass increases with glucose concentration.
  • Panels D, E, F
    Survival curves and AUC in YPD media show no lifespan extension with ; biomass increases with glucose concentration.
  • Panels G, H, I
    Survival curves and AUC in SD media with fourfold show little lifespan change across glucose levels; biomass is highest at normal glucose.
  • Panels J, K, L
    Survival curves and AUC in SD media with fourfold show dietary restriction extends lifespan less than in SD alone; biomass does not increase above 2% glucose.
  • Panels M, N, O
    Survival curves and AUC show high osmolarity and buffered media (, , NaCl) extend lifespan and increase biomass compared to .
Figure 2
vs sch9 vs tor1 vs sir2 yeast strains: relative lifespan, , and across media conditions
Highlights how lifespan, biomass, and viability differ across yeast strains and nutrient conditions, spotlighting viability increases in sch9 strain
pone.0064448.g002
  • Panels WT
    Relative lifespan, biomass, and viability measured for WT strain across 15 media conditions plus SD and controls; lifespan and viability bars vary visibly across conditions
  • Panels sch9
    Relative lifespan, biomass, and viability for sch9 strain across 15 media conditions plus SD control; viability appears visibly higher in some conditions compared to WT
  • Panels tor1
    Relative lifespan, biomass, and viability for tor1 strain across 15 media conditions plus SD control; biomass shows visibly high values in some conditions
  • Panels sir2
    Relative lifespan, biomass, and viability for sir2 strain across 15 media conditions plus SD control; lifespan and biomass bars vary across conditions
Figure 3
Lifespan response surfaces of four yeast strains at varying , , and concentrations
Highlights visibly distinct lifespan nutrient responses in sch9Δ strain compared to others, spotlighting nutrient composition effects
pone.0064448.g003
  • Panels 1–3 (WT)
    Lifespan surfaces for strain at glucose 0.5%, 3%, and 5.5% showing lifespan changes across amino acids (0.5× to 3.5×) and (0.85 to 9.35 g/L)
  • Panels 4–6 (sch9Δ)
    Lifespan surfaces for sch9Δ strain at glucose 0.5%, 3%, and 5.5% with visibly different surface shapes compared to WT, tor1Δ, and sir2Δ strains
  • Panels 7–9 (tor1Δ)
    Lifespan surfaces for tor1Δ strain at glucose 0.5%, 3%, and 5.5% showing similar trends to WT and sir2Δ strains
  • Panels 10–12 (sir2Δ)
    Lifespan surfaces for sir2Δ strain at glucose 0.5%, 3%, and 5.5% showing similar trends to WT and tor1Δ strains
Figure 4
production of four yeast strains at varying , , and concentrations
Highlights how biomass production varies with nutrient composition and glucose levels across yeast strains
pone.0064448.g004
  • Panels 1–3 (WT Glu = 0.5, 3, 5.5)
    Biomass response surfaces for wild-type yeast at low, medium, and high glucose; biomass appears to increase with higher glucose and amino acids
  • Panels 4–6 (SCH9 Glu = 0.5, 3, 5.5)
    Biomass response surfaces for sch9Δ mutant at low, medium, and high glucose; biomass visibly increases with glucose and amino acids
  • Panels 7–9 (TOR1 Glu = 0.5, 3, 5.5)
    Biomass response surfaces for tor1Δ mutant at low, medium, and high glucose; biomass increases with glucose and amino acids
  • Panels 10–12 (SIR2 Glu = 0.5, 3, 5.5)
    Biomass response surfaces for sir2Δ mutant at low, medium, and high glucose; biomass increases with glucose and amino acids
1 / 4

Full Text

What this is

  • This research investigates the relationship between nutrient composition and lifespan in yeast.
  • Using response surface methodology, the study evaluates how varying levels of glucose, amino acids, and yeast nitrogen base affect yeast longevity.
  • The findings suggest that nutrient composition is more critical than simple for extending lifespan.

Essence

  • Nutrient composition, rather than just , significantly influences the lifespan of yeast. The study shows that different strains of yeast respond variably to specific nutrient combinations, indicating that optimizing nutrient balance can enhance longevity.

Key takeaways

  • Lifespan extension in yeast depends on nutrient composition. The study found that varying glucose, amino acids, and yeast nitrogen base levels led to different lifespan outcomes across four yeast strains.
  • Strain sch9Δ exhibited heightened sensitivity to nutrient changes, suggesting that the Sch9 pathway plays a crucial role in nutrient sensing and longevity regulation in yeast.
  • The research indicates that simply buffering the pH of the media can significantly extend lifespan, emphasizing the importance of environmental factors in yeast aging.

Caveats

  • The study's findings are based on specific yeast strains, which may not generalize to other organisms or strains. Further research is needed to validate these results across different models.
  • Variability in experimental conditions, such as nutrient concentrations and media composition, could affect the reproducibility of lifespan outcomes.

Definitions

  • Chronological lifespan (CLS): The duration of time that yeast cells remain viable under specific growth conditions.
  • Dietary restriction (DR): A reduction in calorie intake without malnutrition, often used to study its effects on lifespan.

AI simplified

what lands in your inbox each week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free