PloS one

Diet changes only extend yeast lifespan when nutrient balance is right

Updated

Abstract

Lifespan extension in yeast is influenced more by nutrient composition than by .

  • Changing the balance of dietary components without reducing intake can increase lifespan in yeast.
  • Different strains of yeast exhibited varying responses to nutrient composition regarding lifespan and biomass production.
  • The pH of aging media was influenced by glucose concentration but did not correlate with lifespan when amino acids and yeast nitrogen base were varied.
  • Buffering the pH of the media significantly extended lifespan.
  • The sch9Δ strain showed heightened sensitivity to nutrient changes, indicating its role in regulating growth and longevity.

Simplified

Key numbers

17×
Increase in lifespan
Lifespan extension observed in yeast under optimized nutrient conditions.
4 of 15
production
production varied significantly across different nutrient media.

Key figures

Figure 1
levels and nutrient composition effects on yeast lifespan and production
Highlights how glucose and nutrient composition distinctly influence yeast lifespan and biomass under different media conditions.
pone.0064448.g001
  • Panels A, B, C
    Survival curves and area under curve () show 0.5% glucose extends lifespan most in SD media; biomass increases with glucose concentration.
  • Panels D, E, F
    Survival curves and AUC in YPD media show no lifespan extension with ; biomass increases with glucose concentration.
  • Panels G, H, I
    Survival curves and AUC in SD media with fourfold show little lifespan change across glucose levels; biomass is highest at normal glucose.
  • Panels J, K, L
    Survival curves and AUC in SD media with fourfold show dietary restriction extends lifespan less than in SD alone; biomass does not increase above 2% glucose.
  • Panels M, N, O
    Survival curves and AUC show high osmolarity and buffered media (, , NaCl) extend lifespan and increase biomass compared to .
Figure 2
vs sch9 vs tor1 vs sir2 yeast strains: relative lifespan, , and across media conditions
Highlights how lifespan, biomass, and viability differ across yeast strains and nutrient conditions, spotlighting viability increases in sch9 strain
pone.0064448.g002
  • Panels WT
    Relative lifespan, biomass, and viability measured for WT strain across 15 media conditions plus SD and controls; lifespan and viability bars vary visibly across conditions
  • Panels sch9
    Relative lifespan, biomass, and viability for sch9 strain across 15 media conditions plus SD control; viability appears visibly higher in some conditions compared to WT
  • Panels tor1
    Relative lifespan, biomass, and viability for tor1 strain across 15 media conditions plus SD control; biomass shows visibly high values in some conditions
  • Panels sir2
    Relative lifespan, biomass, and viability for sir2 strain across 15 media conditions plus SD control; lifespan and biomass bars vary across conditions
Figure 3
Lifespan response surfaces of four yeast strains at varying , , and concentrations
Highlights visibly distinct lifespan nutrient responses in sch9Δ strain compared to others, spotlighting nutrient composition effects
pone.0064448.g003
  • Panels 1–3 (WT)
    Lifespan surfaces for strain at glucose 0.5%, 3%, and 5.5% showing lifespan changes across amino acids (0.5× to 3.5×) and (0.85 to 9.35 g/L)
  • Panels 4–6 (sch9Δ)
    Lifespan surfaces for sch9Δ strain at glucose 0.5%, 3%, and 5.5% with visibly different surface shapes compared to WT, tor1Δ, and sir2Δ strains
  • Panels 7–9 (tor1Δ)
    Lifespan surfaces for tor1Δ strain at glucose 0.5%, 3%, and 5.5% showing similar trends to WT and sir2Δ strains
  • Panels 10–12 (sir2Δ)
    Lifespan surfaces for sir2Δ strain at glucose 0.5%, 3%, and 5.5% showing similar trends to WT and tor1Δ strains
Figure 4
production of four yeast strains at varying , , and concentrations
Highlights how biomass production varies with nutrient composition and glucose levels across yeast strains
pone.0064448.g004
  • Panels 1–3 (WT Glu = 0.5, 3, 5.5)
    Biomass response surfaces for wild-type yeast at low, medium, and high glucose; biomass appears to increase with higher glucose and amino acids
  • Panels 4–6 (SCH9 Glu = 0.5, 3, 5.5)
    Biomass response surfaces for sch9Δ mutant at low, medium, and high glucose; biomass visibly increases with glucose and amino acids
  • Panels 7–9 (TOR1 Glu = 0.5, 3, 5.5)
    Biomass response surfaces for tor1Δ mutant at low, medium, and high glucose; biomass increases with glucose and amino acids
  • Panels 10–12 (SIR2 Glu = 0.5, 3, 5.5)
    Biomass response surfaces for sir2Δ mutant at low, medium, and high glucose; biomass increases with glucose and amino acids
1 / 4

Full Text

What this is

  • This research investigates the relationship between nutrient composition and lifespan in yeast.
  • Using response surface methodology, the study evaluates how varying levels of glucose, amino acids, and yeast nitrogen base affect yeast longevity.
  • The findings suggest that nutrient composition is more critical than simple for extending lifespan.

Essence

  • Nutrient composition, rather than just , significantly influences the lifespan of yeast. The study shows that different strains of yeast respond variably to specific nutrient combinations, indicating that optimizing nutrient balance can enhance longevity.

Key takeaways

  • Lifespan extension in yeast depends on nutrient composition. The study found that varying glucose, amino acids, and yeast nitrogen base levels led to different lifespan outcomes across four yeast strains.
  • Strain sch9Δ exhibited heightened sensitivity to nutrient changes, suggesting that the Sch9 pathway plays a crucial role in nutrient sensing and longevity regulation in yeast.
  • The research indicates that simply buffering the pH of the media can significantly extend lifespan, emphasizing the importance of environmental factors in yeast aging.

Caveats

  • The study's findings are based on specific yeast strains, which may not generalize to other organisms or strains. Further research is needed to validate these results across different models.
  • Variability in experimental conditions, such as nutrient concentrations and media composition, could affect the reproducibility of lifespan outcomes.

Definitions

  • Chronological lifespan (CLS): The duration of time that yeast cells remain viable under specific growth conditions.
  • Dietary restriction (DR): A reduction in calorie intake without malnutrition, often used to study its effects on lifespan.

Simplified

Funding

Competing interests

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
PubMed

What Lands in Your Inbox Each Week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • ✅direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free