Evening chronotype, irregular circadian eating patterns, and eating-related behaviors may be associated with increased obesity risk among Turkish university students: A large-scale cross-sectional study

📖 Top 20% JournalNov 30, 2025Nutrition research (New York, N.Y.)

Evening preference, irregular eating patterns, and eating behaviors may be linked to higher obesity risk in Turkish university students.

AI simplified

Circadian Biology on OpenScience ↗PubMed ↗DOI ↗

Abstract

In a study of 618 university students, evening chronotype was linked to poorer dietary patterns and increased obesity risk.

Morning types had higher scores on diet quality and eating awareness questionnaires than evening types.
Evening types exhibited shorter eating windows compared to those with intermediate chronotypes.
Greater eating jetlag correlated with longer eating windows and more frequent breakfast consumption.
Mindful eating scores were inversely associated with waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and body mass index.
Hedonic hunger scores were positively correlated with obesity indicators.

AI simplified

This study investigated the interplay between chronotype, chrononutritional indices, diet quality, eating behaviors, circadian rhythm variables, and obesity indicators in university students. Specifically, in this cross-sectional study, 618 healthy students from Erciyes University completed validated questionnaires assessing chronotype (Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire, MEQ), Mediterranean diet adherence (Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener, MEDAS), hedonic hunger (Power of Food Scale, PFS), eating awareness (Mindful Eating Inventory, MEI), and chrononutritional variables. Furthermore, associations were evaluated using ANCOVA, partial correlations, and multiple regression analyses. Results indicated that morning types demonstrated higher MEDAS and MEI scores, more frequent breakfast consumption, lower eating and social jetlag than evening types; while evening types had a shorter eating window than intermediate types (all P < .05). Moreover, greater eating jetlag was associated with longer eating windows, more frequent breakfast consumption, higher social jetlag, and shorter sleep (all P < .001). In addition, multivariable models showed that MEI scores were inversely associated with waist circumference (β = -0.104, P < .001), waist-to-hip ratio (β = -0.074, P = .013), and body mass index (β = -0.156, P < .001). Conversely, PFS scores were positively correlated with anthropometric indicators of obesity, while MEI scores were inversely associated with these measures (all P < .05). Taken together, evening chronotype, irregular meal timing, and predominantly lower eating awareness were independently linked to poorer dietary patterns, adverse eating behaviors, and increased obesity risk in young adults. Thus, promoting morning-oriented eating, regular meals, and mindful eating may improve metabolic health in this population.

Full Text

Full text is available at the source.

View full text (XML) ↗View full text ↗

Abstract

Full Text

Related papers