What this is
- This study examines the impact of frequent tea consumption on among older adults in China using data from the 2018 Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey.
- A total of 11,910 participants were analyzed to determine the relationship between tea drinking habits and cognitive health outcomes.
- The findings suggest that frequent tea drinkers, particularly those consuming green tea, exhibit better and lower rates of cognitive impairment.
Essence
- Frequent tea consumption positively affects in older adults, especially with green tea. Participants who drank tea regularly showed significantly lower risks of cognitive impairment.
Key takeaways
- Frequent tea drinkers had a () score increase of 0.340 compared to infrequent drinkers, indicating better .
- Participants who drank tea frequently were 59.7% less likely to experience severe cognitive impairment, 74.8% less likely to have moderate impairment, and 81.8% less likely to have mild impairment compared to infrequent drinkers.
- Depression and sleep quality partially mediated the relationship between tea consumption and , accounting for 27.6% and 3.5% of the total effect, respectively.
Caveats
- The study relies on self-reported data, which may introduce measurement errors and affect the accuracy of the findings.
- Cross-sectional data limits the ability to establish causal relationships between tea consumption and .
- Potential omitted variable bias exists despite controlling for numerous demographic and health-related factors.
Definitions
- Cognitive function: The ability of the brain to process, store, and retrieve information, including perception, attention, memory, and logical thinking.
- Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): A widely used test to measure cognitive function, scoring from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive health.
AI simplified
Introduction
Cognitive function refers to the ability of human brain to process, store and extract information, including perception, attention, memory, logical thinking, and other abilities (1). Older adults generally experience decreases in cognitive function with ageing. A recent study revealed that the overall prevalence of dementia is 6.0%, and that of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is 15.5% among the Chinese older adults, respectively 15.07 million dementia patients and 38.77 million MCI patients (2). Cognitive impairment in older people is associated with a reduced quality of life and an increased risk of death, while it also brings a heavy burden to families and society (3).
Originating in China, tea and tea planting have spread all over the world since the middle of the Tang dynasty. At present, tea has become one of the most widely consumed beverages other than water (4). Biological studies have found that catechins, theanine and other compounds in tea may have neuroprotective effects (5, 6). Tea drinking habit in older people may prevent the decline of memory and associative learning ability by affecting the posterior volume of corpus callosum, contributing to an improvement of the cognitive function (7). In addition, epidemiological investigations from the United States, Japan, Singapore, China and other countries also attempted to reveal the relationship between tea drinking and cognitive function in older people, and most studies concluded that frequent tea consumption was associated with better cognitive function (8β16). However, there are some inconsistent findings. For instances, Xu et al. demonstrated that the benefits of tea drinking were restricted to cognitively healthy older adults but not older adults with MCI (17). Ide et al. reported that green tea consumption over 12 months may not significantly affect cognitive function measured by the Japanese version of the MMSE (18). Drinking green tea, but not black tea or others, was found to be associated significantly with a reduced risk of cognitive decline (19β21).
Other studies have focused on the effects of tea consumption on depression and sleep quality. It has been shown that frequent tea drinkers have significantly lower levels of depression (22β27) and that frequent tea drinking is effective in improving sleep quality in older adults (28β30), while depression and sleep disturbance are often considered risk factors for cognitive function in older people (31β35). Therefore, we hypothesise that depression levels and sleep quality may play mediating roles in the association between frequent tea consumption and cognitive function.
Among the previous studies on the relationship between frequent tea drinking and cognitive function, some of them were randomized controlled trials, the sample sizes of which were often too small to draw strong inference; and others using epidemiological data of large samples were likely to suffer from endogeneity problems such as self- selection bias, which might lead to unreliable results. Based on the data from the 2018 wave of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS), this article used ordinary least squares (OLS) to explore whether frequent tea consumption had a significant impact on the cognitive function of older people. We addressed the problem of endogeneity by using a propensity score matching (PSM) approach. In addition, few studies have been conducted to explore the mediating effects of depression and sleep quality on the relationship between tea drinking and cognitive function in older adults. This paper further explored the mechanisms of tea drinking on cognitive function. Therefore, our study fills a gap in the literature and contributes to a more integrated analysis of tea consumption on cognitive function in older people.
Methods
Data source
The data in this paper came from the 2018 wave of CLHLS, published by the Centre for Healthy Ageing and Development, Peking University. The 2018 CLHLS used a stratified sampling method to investigate the demographic characteristics, dietary habits, behaviors and lifestyles, health status, and other relevant information of older adults people in 23 provinces of China, with a total of 15,874 samples. Excluding samples under 60 years of age, and those with missing data on key variables, a total of 11,910 valid samples were obtained for this study (see Figure 1).
Flowchart of the study population.
Variables
Dependent variable
CFS (cognitive function score) was the dependent variable in this study. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was designed by Folstein (36), and now it is widely used to measure cognitive function and has good applicability in the Chinese population (37). This survey used a validated Chinese version of MMSE scale to assess 6 areas of cognitive function in older people, including orientation (10 points), immediate memory (3 points), attention and calculation (5 points), delayed memory (3 points), verbal ability (8 points), and visual-spatial skill (1 point). The dependent variable was described by MMSE scores, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function.
Independent variables
In this study, the key independent variable was defined as whether one drank tea frequently, represented by TEA. The participants were asked to report their past frequency of tea drinking at around age 60 as well as their current frequency of tea drinking. If the answer was βalmost every day,β the participant was considered to be a frequent tea drinker and the variable tea was assigned a value of 1. If the answer was βat least once a week,β βat least once a month,β βsometimesβ or βrarely or never,β the participant was considered to be an infrequent tea drinker and the variable tea was assigned a value of 0.
Control variables
Based on previous studies (38β40), three types of variables were treated as control variables in this study. The first type of control variables described the demographic characteristics, which included Gender (1 = male; 0 = female), Age (continuous variable), Marriage (1 = married; 0 = single, divorced or widowed), Resident (1 = living in urban areas; 0 = living in rural areas), Education (years of schooling, continuous variable), and SES (socio-economic status: 1 = good; 0 = poor). The lifestyles were the second type of control variables, including Living arrangement (1 = living with family, 2 = living alone; 3 = living in an institution), Smoke (1 = yes, 0 = no), Drink (drinking alcohol regularly, 1 = yes, 0 = no), Exercise (1 = yes, 0 = no), Examination (regular physical examination once every year, 1 = yes; 0 = no), and Interact (frequency of interacting with friends: 1 = no; 2 = sometimes; 3 = monthly; 4 = weekly; 5 = daily). The third type of control variables were health statuses, including subjective health and objective health. We used a score of SRH (self-rated health: 1 = very bad; 2 = bad; 3 = fair; 4 = good; 5 = very good) to measure the subjective health, and the objective health was measured by a score of ADL (activities of daily living: 1 = strongly limited; 2 = limited; 3 = not limited).
Mediating variables
There were two mediating variables in this study, including depression scores and sleep quality. The 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD-10), which has shown good reliability and validity (41), was employed to measure the depressive symptoms. The variable Depression was created as a total score for the 10 items, and each of them was scored 0β3. Higher scores denoted greater severity of depression, with a total score range from 0 to 30. In addition, the variable Sleep was created and assigned a value of β1β5β for the current sleep quality of βvery bad, bad, fair, good and very good.β
Statistical analyses
As the dependent variable was treated as a continuous variable, this study constructed a multiple regression model to analyze the relationship between tea drinking and cognitive function, and the regression equation is shown below.
where i indicated individual, CFSi denoted the cognitive function score of older adults, TEAi stood for whether tea was consumed frequently, CVi represented the control variables, including demographic characteristics, lifestyles and health statuses, Ξ±0 indicated the intercept term, Ξ±1 was the regression coefficient of variable TEA, which was our main interest, Ξ±2 denoted the coefficients of control variables, and Ξ΅i was the error term.
Furthermore, using this multiple regression model, we examined the robustness of this research by replacing the independent and dependent variables separately. We focused on the effects of drinking different types of tea and different frequencies of tea drinking on cognitive function scores, as well as the effects of frequent tea drinking on cognitive function status.
Propensity score matching (PSM) can address the selection bias caused by observable individual heterogeneity, and bring the observed data close to the randomized trial data. In this study the propensity score, defined as the conditional probability that an individual was a frequent tea drinker based on the observable characteristics, was calculated from the logit regression coefficient. Average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) was estimated as follows:
wheresuggests the average MMSE score of the older adults drinking tea frequently, andis the counterfactual outcome, which indicates what the average MMSE score of the older adults drinking tea frequently would have been if they had not drunk tea frequently. E Y 1 i D i | = 1 Y 0 i D i | = 1
We attempted to test whether frequent tea consumption could protect cognitive function by reducing depression levels and improving sleep quality using a stepwise regression approach.was employed to analyze how independent variable TEA affect variable MEDIA. After addition of variable MEDIA,was used to check whether the effect of tea drinking on the cognitive function still existed and whether it was quantitatively changed. The specification of econometric model is as follows: Eq. (2) Eq. (3)
where MEDIAi denoted mediating variable, which referred to the variable of Depression and Sleep, respectively. TEAi indicated whether tea was consumed frequently, CVi represented the control variables, Ξ²0 suggested the intercept term, Ξ²1 was the coefficient of TEAi, which was our main interest, Ξ²2 stood for the coefficients of control variables, and ΞΌi was the error term.
where CFSi denoted the cognitive function score of older adults, TEAi indicated whether tea was consumed frequently, MEDIAi suggested mediating variable, CVi represented the control variables, Ξ³0 indicated the intercept term, Ξ³1, the coefficient of TEAi and Ξ³2, the coefficient of MEDIAi were our main interest, Ξ³3 indicated the coefficients of control variables, and Οi was the error term.
In this study, Stata 17.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX) was used to conduct descriptive statistics, construct OLS regression and mediating effects models, and perform PSM and robustness test. Moreover, all tests were two-sided, with a p value <0.05 indicating statistical significance.
Results
Descriptive statistics
Table 1 displays the results of the descriptive statistics. There were 17.20% of the older adults who were frequent tea drinkers in the sample of 11,910, and the mean cognitive function score on MMSE in the full sample was 24.43 Β± 6.76. The frequent tea drinkers had a higher MMSE score (26.40 Β± 5.35), compared with participants who reported never drinking tea frequently (mean score: 24.02 Β± 6.94). ANOVA revealed that the MMSE score was significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.001). Among the study population, 44.26% were male, 43.40% were married, and 29.49% were urban residents. We found the mean age of respondents was 84.39 Β± 11.67 years, and their mean education was 3.43 years. Additional information is also provided in Table 1, and significant differences in each parameter were observed between the two groups (p < 0.001).
| Variable/subgroups | Total sample | Frequent tea-drinking | Infrequent tea-drinking | valuep |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample,n | 11,910 | 2,048 | 9,862 | |
| % | 100 | 17.2 | 82.8 | |
| CFS | 24.43βΒ±β6.76 | 26.40βΒ±β5.35 | 24.02βΒ±β6.94 | <0.001 |
| Male (%) | 5,271 (44.26) | 1,351 (65.97) | 3,920 (39.75) | <0.001 |
| Age | 84.39βΒ±β11.67 | 81.47βΒ±β11.18 | 85.00βΒ±β11.67 | <0.001 |
| Married (%) | 5,169 (43.40) | 1,176 (57.42) | 3,993 (40.49) | <0.001 |
| Urban residents (%) | 3,512 (29.49) | 917 (44.78) | 2,595 (26.31) | <0.001 |
| Education | 3.43βΒ±β4.24 | 5.65βΒ±β4.81 | 2.96βΒ±β3.96 | <0.001 |
| SES good (%) | 10,260 (86.15) | 1,845 (90.09) | 8,415 (85.33) | <0.001 |
| Living arrangement | 1.23βΒ±β0.50 | 1.19βΒ±β0.47 | 1.24βΒ±β0.51 | <0.001 |
| Smoker (%) | 1,777 (14.92) | 519 (25.34) | 1,258 (12.76) | <0.001 |
| Alcohol drinker (%) | 1,704 (14.31) | 496 (24.22) | 1,208 (12.25) | <0.001 |
| Regular exercise (%) | 3,881 (32.59) | 940 (45.90) | 2,941 (29.82) | <0.001 |
| Regular physical examination (%) | 8,165 (68.56) | 1,472 (71.88) | 6,693 (67.87) | <0.001 |
| Interacting with friends | 2.76βΒ±β1.71 | 2.87βΒ±β1.69 | 2.74βΒ±β1.71 | <0.001 |
| SRH | 3.39βΒ±β0.95 | 3.51βΒ±β0.95 | 3.37βΒ±β0.95 | <0.001 |
| ADL | 2.56βΒ±β0.67 | 2.65βΒ±β0.61 | 2.54βΒ±β0.68 | <0.001 |
OLS regression
Table 2 shows the OLS regression results of the effect of tea drinking on cognitive function score. According to Model 1, we found that frequent tea consumption produced a significantly positive effect on cognitive function score (coefficient = 2.382, p < 0.001), but this model had a goodness-of-fit of R2 = 0.018, which was not satisfactory. With the addition of demographic characteristics and lifestyles variables to Model 2 and 3 in turn, the regression coefficient decreased to 0.493 and 0.406, however R2 was increased to 0.311 and 0.339, respectively. When we further added the control variables of health statuses to Model 4, the regression results showed that the coefficient decreased to 0.340, which is significant at 0.01 level. The regression results imply that compared to the older adults who did not drink tea frequently, the frequent tea drinkers had an increased MMSE score by 0.340 after adjusting for the control variables.
Furthermore, the regression results from Model 4 indicate that being a male (coefficient = 1.065, p < 0.001), being married (coefficient = 0.271, p < 0.05), living in urban areas (coefficient = 1.201, p < 0.001), having more years of education (coefficient = 0.117, p < 0.001), exercising regularly (coefficient = 0.474, p < 0.001), attending regular physical examination (coefficient = 0.806, p < 0.001), Interacting with friends frequently (coefficient = 0.387, p < 0.001), as well as having a high score of SRH (coefficient = 0.976, p < 0.001), and ADL (coefficient = 1.597, p < 0.001) had a significant positive effect on cognitive function in older people. We also obtain evidence indicating that being older (coefficient = β0.212, p < 0.001), and drinking alcohol regularly (coefficient = β0.276, p < 0.05) had a significantly negative effect on MMSE score.
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tea | 2.382*** (0.137) | 0.493*** (0.123) | 0.406*** (0.121) | 0.340** (0.117) |
| Gender | 1.240*** (0.113) | 1.140*** (0.121) | 1.065*** (0.117) | |
| Age | β0.279*** (0.058) | β0.233*** (0.058) | β0.212*** (0.057) | |
| Marriage | 0.078 (0.114) | 0.160 (0.123) | 0.271* (0.120) | |
| Resident | 0.936*** (0.130) | 1.090*** (0.131) | 1.201*** (0.125) | |
| Education | 0.131*** (0.014) | 0.117*** (0.140) | 0.117*** (0.013) | |
| SES | 0.896*** (0.159) | 0.682*** (0.156) | β0.002 (0.155) | |
| Living arrangement | 0.078 (0.118) | 0.178 (0.112) | ||
| Smoke | 0.112 (0.136) | 0.035 (0.133) | ||
| Drink | 0.071 (0.135) | β0.276* (0.132) | ||
| Exercise | 0.940*** (0.098) | 0.474*** (0.096) | ||
| Examination | 0.943*** (0.123) | 0.806*** (0.118) | ||
| Interact | 0.535*** (0.030) | 0.387*** (0.029) | ||
| SRH | 0.976*** (0.065) | |||
| ADL | 1.597*** (0.098) | |||
| Constant | 24.021*** (0.070) | 45.791*** (0.505) | 39.588*** (0.576) | 31.535*** (0.649) |
| -squaredR | 0.018 | 0.311 | 0.339 | 0.387 |
Propensity score matching
This study was not a randomized trial, and the participants were not randomly assigned to the intervention group or the control group. Individual characteristics may influence not only cognitive function in older people, but also whether he or she drank tea frequently as well. Therefore, due to self-selection bias, the OLS regression results should be viewed with caution. We next used a propensity score matching (PSM) approach to tackle the endogeneity problem caused by self-selection.
Treating whether an individual drank tea frequently or not as the dependent variable, the binary logit estimations are presented in Table 3. The logit regression results showed that the individual characteristics variables of Gender, Age, Resident, Education, Sex, Living arrangement, Smoke, Drink, and Exercise had a significant effect on whether individuals drank tea frequently.
Then K-nearest neighbor matching, kernel matching and nearest-neighbor matching within caliper of the PSM method were used to conduct a robustness check. Figures 2A,B indicated the distribution of propensity scores before and after matching, respectively. By comparing the distribution of propensity scores before and after matching, it can be visualized that the PSM method significantly corrected the propensity score deviation between the treatment group and the control group.
Table 4 provided the PSM estimation results for the effect of frequent tea consumption on cognitive function. The ATT values from the three matching methods were 0.441, 0.503, and 0.437, respectively. They were all significant at a level of at least 5%, which further demonstrated that frequent tea consumption had a significantly positive effect on cognitive function. After alleviating the endogenous problem of self-selection, the results were generally consistent with the benchmark regression analysis.
Graphs showed that there was a significant difference in the distribution of propensity scores between the treatment group and the control group before matching, while the distributions of propensity scores for the two groups became similar after matching. (A) (B)
| Tea | Coef. | Std. Err. | Z | >β||Pz |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.612*** | 0.06 | 10.14 | 0 |
| Age | β0.008** | 0.003 | β2.66 | 0.008 |
| Marriage | 0.046 | 0.067 | 0.69 | 0.49 |
| Resident | 0.521*** | 0.062 | 8.42 | 0 |
| Education | 0.068*** | 0.007 | 9.99 | 0 |
| SES | 0.197* | 0.085 | 2.33 | 0.02 |
| Living arrangement | 0.167** | 0.058 | β2.89 | 0.004 |
| Smoke | 0.455*** | 0.068 | 6.66 | 0 |
| Drink | 0.383*** | 0.068 | 5.62 | 0 |
| Exercise | 0.305*** | 0.056 | 5.48 | 0 |
| Examination | β0.033 | 0.059 | β0.56 | 0.576 |
| Interact | β0.004 | 0.165 | β0.26 | 0.797 |
| SRH | 0.048 | 0.029 | 1.67 | 0.095 |
| ADL | 0.031 | 0.045 | 0.69 | 0.491 |
| Constant | β2.169 | 0.344 | β6.30 | 0 |
| Method | Treated | Controlled | ATT | S.E. | T-stat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K-nearest neighbor matching | 26.397 | 25.957 | 0.441* | 0.169 | 2.61 |
| Kernel matching | 26.397 | 25.895 | 0.503*** | 0.151 | 3.33 |
| Nearest-neighbor matching within caliper | 26.397 | 25.96 | 0.437* | 0.168 | 2.61 |
Robustness test
In order to ensure the robustness of our conclusions, we conducted a robustness test by replacing the proxy variable of the explained and core explanatory variable. A new explanatory variable Ctea was created to denote the category of tea. We found 9,862 respondents did not drink tea frequently, and the variable Ctea was assigned a value of β0.β Among the 2,048 participants who drank tea frequently, 1,092 respondents drinking green tea were assigned as value β2β of variable Ctea, and 956 samples drinking black tea or other teas was assigned as value β1.β With Ctea as an independent variable. A multiple regression model was constructed by retaining the other variables of Eq. (1). Column Model 1 in Table 5 showed the results that frequent tea consumption was beneficial to cognitive function irrespective of tea category. In contrast however, the positive effect of green tea (coefficient 0.409, p < 0.01) was significantly greater than the other teas (coefficient 0.261, p < 0.1).
Another explanatory variable, Ftea, which indicates the frequency of tea drinking, was assigned a value of β0β for rarely or never tea drinking, β2β for drinking tea almost every day, and β1β for drinking tea less frequently in between. Similarly, the results of multiple regression were reported in Column Model 2 of Table 5. Compared to no tea drinking, only frequent tea drinking (coefficient = 0.361, p < 0.01) had a positive effect on cognitive function, and low frequency of tea drinking did not have a significant effect on cognitive function.
In addition, the explained variable OCFS was created to measure the ordered cognitive function score instead of the original dependent variable for this study. According to the MMSE scale, a score of 10 or less is considered severe cognitive impairment; 10β20, moderate cognitive impairment; 21β26, mild cognitive impairment; 27β30, normal. From severe cognitive impairment to normal, the older adults of these four subgroups accounted for 5.7, 14.3, 27.4, and 52.6% of the total population respectively, and were assigned a value of β1β4β in turn. Taking OCFS as the dependent variable, multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the RRR (relative risk ratios). Column Model 3 of Table 5 showed that frequent tea drinkers were significantly 59.7, 74.8, and 81.8% less likely to have severe, moderate and mild cognitive impairment respectively, compared to infrequent tea drinkers (p < 0.01). The robustness analysis not only verified the reliability of the results of the benchmark regression, but also provided more detailed information on the causal relationship between tea drinking and cognitive function.
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OLS | Multinomial Logit | ||||
| CFS | OCFS | ||||
| Ctea | 1 | 0.261* (0.154) | |||
| 2 | 0.409*** (0.152) | ||||
| Ftea | 1 | 0.277 (0.228) | |||
| 2 | 0.361*** (0.119) | ||||
| Tea | 1 | 0.597*** (0.105) | |||
| 2 | 0.748*** (0.077) | ||||
| 3 | 0.815*** (0.052) | ||||
| 4 | Base | ||||
| Control Variables | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| Constant | 31.544*** (0.650) | 31.509*** (0.650) | 39.588*** (0.576) | ||
| -squaredR | 0.387 | 0.388 | 0.206 | ||
Mechanism analysis
The above studies revealed the benefits of frequent tea consumption on cognitive function in older adults comprehensively, but a question still remained unanswered: how does frequent tea consumption affect cognitive function? Table 6 displayed the mediating effects of depression and sleep quality on the association between tea drinking and cognitive function.
The results of stepwise regressions, taking depression as the mediating variable were summarized in columns (1)β(3) of Table 6, corresponding to Eqs. (1)β(3). As can be seen from column (1) of Table 6, frequent tea consumption positively affected cognitive function (coefficient = 0.340, p < 0.01). The regression results in column (2) showed that frequent tea consumption significantly reduced the level of depression in older adults (coefficient = β0.297, p < 0.05). Column (3) presented that the coefficient of tea remained significantly positive (coefficient = 0.246, p < 0.05), implying a direct effect of frequent tea consumption on cognitive function after controlling for variable depression. Meanwhile, the coefficient of depression was significantly negative (coefficient = β0.316, p < 0.001), suggesting that a reduction in depression scores significantly enhances cognitive function. Therefore, depression partially mediated the relationship between tea consumption and cognitive function. The mediating effect accounted for 27.6% of the total effect.
In addition, we used Sleep as a mediating variable to test for mediating effects. As shown in columns (4)β(6) of Table 6, frequent tea consumption significantly improved sleep quality in older adults, which in turn significantly contributed to cognitive function. We captured that sleep quality had partial mediation effect for frequent tea consumption on cognitive function, accounting for 3.5% of the total effect.
| Variables | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFS | Depression | CFS | CFS | Sleep | CFS | |
| Tea | 0.340** (0.117) | β0.297* (0.122) | 0.246* (0.114) | 0.340** (0.117) | 0.054* (0.025) | 0.328** (0.117) |
| Depression/Sleep | β0.316*** (0.011) | 0.231*** (0.055) | ||||
| Control variables | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Constant | 31.535*** (0.649) | 17.767*** (0.618) | 37.142*** (0.650) | 31.535*** (0.649) | 1.726*** (0.117) | 31.135*** (0.656) |
| -squaredR | 0.387 | 0.324 | 0.445 | 0.387 | 0.149 | 0.389 |
| Mediating effects | 0.094 | 0.012 | ||||
| Mediating effects/Total effects | 0.276 | 0.035 | ||||
Discussion
In this large population-based study, we observed that older people who frequently consumed any type of tea was associated with a higher MMSE score. This finding was in line with many previous studies. The tea leaves contain various bioactive components that confer multiple health benefits, which may explain the effect of tea on cognitive function. Catechin has been well demonstrated to affect the brain by relieving stress and improving mood (13), and catechins also have been reported to possess antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects (14). However, only with a high frequency of tea consumption, these components could reach a certain concentration in the blood to protect cognitive function effectively (5).
Preparation methods can vary greatly among different types of tea. Green tea, which has the greatest market share, is the only non-fermented tea that offers the best protection for cognitive function in older people. Relatively, black tea is a fully fermented tea and the fermentation process usually reduces the content of active ingredients such as catechins and theanine, which makes possible explanations for some studies suggesting that black tea consumption in older people was not associated with cognitive decline (19).
Two studies, from the United States and Japan (18, 19), did not find a significant association between tea consumption and cognitive function scores, while the findings from studies in older adults Chinese or overseas Chinese were highly consistent with our research conclusions (8β12). In China, the βtea ceremonyβ was formed in the Tang Dynasty or earlier. Tea drinking was not only regarded as a good dietary habit, but also an important social activity and a way to cultivate the body and mind by making, appreciating and tasting tea. Therefore, we suggested that older Chinese people who drank tea frequently were psychologically healthier, and levels of depression played an important mediating role between tea consumption and the cognitive health of older Chinese adults. Besides physiological mechanisms, psychosocial factors may also play a role on the effect, which was a noteworthy aspect observed in this study. However, more research is warranted to shed light on this.
This study explored mediation effect of sleep quality on associations between tea consumption and cognitive function. Actually, the effect of tea consumption on sleep quality is controversial. Tea contains caffeine, which is generally considered to be one of the sleep disturbing factors. However, a recent study suggested that tea active ingredients can enhance sleep quality through neuroendocrine pathway, immune system and intestinal microbiota (30). In our study the overall effect of frequent tea consumption on sleep quality was found to be significantly positive, but the robustness and heterogeneity of this effect needs to be further tested.
This study has practical implications. On the one hand, middle-aged and older adults should be encouraged to cultivate a habit of tea drinking as early as possible, which has some effect on protecting cognitive function. On the other hand, in order to enable healthy ageing, the government ought to guide communities and pension institutions to offer interventions of tea therapy for people at risk of cognitive dysfunction (42, 43).
This present study has made several contributions. To our knowledge, this was the first study that PSM method was conducted to confirm the effects of tea consumption on cognitive function, due to the self-selection bias presented in large-scale epidemiological survey. In addition, by replacing the explanatory and explained variable, robustness testing supplemented a more detailed account of the effects. Finally, this study was the first attempt to reveal the psychosocial mechanisms of the relationship between tea consumption and cognitive health by using mediating effects models.
There are still some methodological limitations in this study. Firstly, all variables were measured through self-report questionnaires, which may be in error with the true values. In addition, data imputation was used to fill in missing values to avoid loss of useful information. The measurement errors above would result in inaccurate quantitative estimation of the effect. Secondly, although a large number of control variables were included in our models, our approaches including PSM, could not rule out the possibility of omitted variables bias. Finally, this study used cross-sectional data so that the causal relationship could be considered less solid. We do not know exactly how long individuals need to continue drinking tea to have an effect on cognitive function.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we observed beneficial effects of frequent tea consumption on cognitive function, especially in older people with green tea intake. Frequent tea consumption was found to be related with a significantly decreased risk of severe, moderate and mild cognitive impairment. Furthermore, we found that sleep quality and levels of depression partially mediated the association between frequent tea consumption and cognitive function in older adults. Prospective studies or randomized trials in different geographical areas are required to clarify the causality, taking the categories of tea, frequency and duration of tea consumption into account.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author. Supplementary material
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by The Ethical Committee of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
CW: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing β original draft, Writing β review & editing. JZ: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing β review & editing. NC: Writing β original draft. ZX: Data curation, Writing β review & editing. HT: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing β review & editing.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by Humanities and Social Studies Program of Ministry of Education (20YJC840004); Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of universities in Jiangsu Province (2023SJYB0310).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisherβs note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1269675/full#supplementary-materialβ
References
Associated Data
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author. Supplementary material