A Hydrogel Drink With High Fructose Content Generates Higher Exogenous Carbohydrate Oxidation and a Reduced Drop in Dental Biofilm pH Compared to Two Other, Commercially Available, Carbohydrate Sports Drinks

Jun 30, 2020Frontiers in nutrition

A High-Fructose Hydrogel Drink Increases Carbohydrate Use and Lowers Mouth Acidity Compared to Two Other Sports Drinks

AI simplified

Abstract

during the second hour of exercise varied significantly among drinks: MD+FRU at 1.17 g·min, MD+SUC at 1.01 g·min, and AP at 0.84 g·min.

  • Carbohydrate oxidation and blood glucose levels were significantly lower following MD+FRU consumption compared to MD+SUC and AP.
  • Biofilm acidity showed a less pronounced pH drop with MD+FRU compared to the other drinks containing acidulants.
  • The higher fructose content in MD+FRU may be associated with its improved carbohydrate uptake relative to MD+SUC and AP.
  • A carbohydrate solution without added acidulants may result in fewer negative effects on oral health.

AI simplified

Key numbers

39%
Increase in Carbohydrate Oxidation Rate
MD+FRU vs. AP during the second hour of exercise
3.54 ± 0.50 mmol·L
Blood Glucose Levels Post-Exercise
MD+FRU vs. MD+SUC and AP at the end of exercise
pH 6.0
Drop
MD+FRU compared to MD+SUC and AP

Full Text

What this is

  • This study evaluated three carbohydrate sports drinks differing in composition, osmolality, and pH.
  • It focused on their effects on carbohydrate oxidation during exercise and .
  • Twelve trained endurance athletes participated in a crossover design, consuming each drink during cycling.

Essence

  • The maltodextrin-fructose hydrogel drink generated higher carbohydrate oxidation rates and caused a less pronounced drop in compared to maltodextrin-sucrose and amylopectin drinks.

Key takeaways

  • MD+FRU drink led to a 39% higher carbohydrate oxidation rate compared to AP and a 9% higher rate compared to MD+SUC during the second hour of exercise.
  • At the end of exercise, blood glucose levels were lower after MD+FRU consumption (3.54 ± 0.50 mmol·L) compared to MD+SUC (4.07 ± 0.67 mmol·L) and AP (4.28 ± 0.47 mmol·L).
  • showed a less pronounced drop for MD+FRU compared to MD+SUC and AP, indicating a potentially lower risk for dental erosion.

Caveats

  • The study's sample size was limited to 12 participants, which may affect the generalizability of the findings.
  • Differences in carbon content among the drinks could influence oxidation efficiency calculations, potentially skewing results.

Definitions

  • exogenous carbohydrate oxidation: The process by which carbohydrates ingested during exercise are metabolized for energy.
  • dental biofilm pH: The acidity level of the bacterial film on teeth, which can influence dental health.

AI simplified

what lands in your inbox each week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free