The Lancet. Infectious diseases

Immune response and safety of a booster dose of a self-amplifying RNA COVID-19 vaccine compared to the Pfizer mRNA vaccine in a large, controlled trial

Updated

Abstract

A total of 828 participants were enrolled to compare the immune responses of the ARCT-154 and BNT162b2 vaccines as fourth-dose boosters.

  • The ARCT-154 vaccine induced a geometric mean titre (GMT) of surrogate neutralising antibodies of 5641 against the Wuhan-Hu-1 strain, compared to 3934 with the BNT162b2 vaccine, demonstrating non-inferiority.
  • Seroresponse rates were higher in the ARCT-154 group at 65.2% versus 51.6% in the BNT162b2 group, with a difference of 13.6%.
  • For the omicron BA.4/5 variant, ARCT-154 showed a GMT of 2551, compared to 1958 for BNT162b2, indicating a GMT ratio of 1.30.
  • Both vaccines were reported to be well tolerated, with no treatment-related deaths or severe adverse events causally associated with the vaccinations.
  • Adverse events were mainly mild and resolved within 3-4 days post-vaccination, with local reactions occurring in 95% of ARCT-154 and 97% of BNT162b2 recipients.

Simplified

Full Text

Full text is available at the source.

Funding

Competing interests

Declaration of interests YO, MK, YI, IO, TM, and YY are full-time employees of, and TK is a board member of, the study sponsor Meiji Seika Pharma. YK received fees from Meiji Seika Pharma for medical consultation during this study. BG and YZ are full-time employees of Arcturus Therapeutics, which developed the vaccine, and JLW is an independent consultant working for Arcturus Therapeutics.
PubMed

What Lands in Your Inbox Each Week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free