Intergenerational relationships negatively predicted with a beta coefficient of -0.610.
Intergenerational relationships, , and are significantly correlated with depressive symptoms (P < 0.05).
Self-rated health negatively predicts depressive symptoms with a beta coefficient of -1.115 (P < 0.001).
Well-being also negatively predicts depressive symptoms with a beta coefficient of -0.653 (P < 0.001).
Self-rated health and well-being act as chain mediators in the relationship between intergenerational relationships and depressive symptoms (β = -1.118, P < 0.001).
These findings suggest that enhancing self-rated health and well-being through intergenerational support may mitigate depressive symptoms in elderly patients with multiple chronic conditions.
Simplified
BACKGROUND: The superimposition of multiple chronic conditions places a heavy physical burden and life pressure on older adults, making them more prone to psychological distress and significantly increasing their risk of depression, which has become an urgent public health issue. Intergenerational relationships, as the main source of social support for older adults, have a profound effect on their mental health. This study aims to explore the potential mediating mechanisms by which intergenerational relationships influence among older adults within the context of the Chinese "filial piety" culture, providing a theoretical foundation for optimizing intergenerational support and improving the psychological of older adults.
METHODS: Data from the 2020 China Family Panel Study (CFPS) were used, and 739 elderly patients with multiple chronic conditions were selected as the study subjects. Data on intergenerational relationships, , well-being, and depressive symptoms were also obtained. A chain mediation model was developed using SPSS PROCESS macro model 6, and one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis, and mediation effect tests were performed to investigate the effects of intergenerational relationships, self-rated health, and well-being on depressive symptoms in elderly patients with multiple chronic conditions.
RESULTS: Intergenerational relationships, self-rated health, and well-being were found to be significantly correlated with depressive symptoms (P < 0.05). Intergenerational relationships negatively predicted depressive symptoms (β = -0.610, P < 0.01). Self-rated health (β = -1.115, P < 0.001) and well-being (β = -0.653, P < 0.001) mediated the effect of intergenerational relationships on depressive symptoms. Additionally, self-rated health and well-being were identified as chain mediators in this relationship for elderly patients with multiple chronic conditions (β = -1.118, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Intergenerational relationships can reduce depressive symptoms among elderly patients with multiple chronic conditions by enhancing self-rated health and well-being. These findings highlight the importance of family support and emotional communication in mental health interventions for older adults. Therefore, healthcare professionals should incorporate family support and encourage positive intergenerational relationships when designing interventions to foster a supportive environment and improve quality of life.
Key numbers
-0.610
Decrease in
Effect of intergenerational relationships on .
-0.128
Decrease in via
Mediating effect of .
-0.354
Decrease in via
Mediating effect of .
Full Text
We can’t show the full text here under this license.
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study involving human participants was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Review Board of Peking University (IRB00001052-14010). According to the information released by the Institute of Social Science Survey (ISSS) at Peking University on May 13, 2022, the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) project was approved by the Peking University Biomedical Ethics Review Committee under this IRB number. As the CFPS project is a continuing follow-up investigation, after the initial approval, Peking University submitted annual applications for continuing review to the Ethics Review Board. All participants provided written informed consent before participation. This study and its methodology are on the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.