Cost-effectiveness of Ketamine Compared to Electroconvulsive Therapy for Nonpsychotic Treatment-Resistant Depression
Updated
Abstract
The cost-effectiveness of racemic ketamine versus ECT for treatment-resistant depression is evaluated in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).
- Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is recognized as a highly effective treatment for depression that does not respond to other therapies.
- Concerns about cognitive side effects have limited the use of ECT.
- Recent evidence suggests that ketamine may sustain its efficacy for more than one month in treating treatment-resistant depression.
- This examination focuses on comparing the costs and benefits of racemic ketamine and ECT specifically through QALYs.
Simplified