Cultivation of the macrophyte Lemna minor and the microalgae Chlorella sorokiniana in thermal mineral waters: Biomass characteristics, radioisotopes and heavy metals content

Apr 5, 2024Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)

Growing the water plant Lemna minor and algae Chlorella sorokiniana in warm mineral water: Biomass traits and levels of radioactivity and heavy metals

AI simplified

Circadian Biology on OpenScience ↗PubMed ↗DOI ↗

Abstract

Lemna minor showed protein concentrations higher than those of Chlorella sorokiniana.

The highest specific growth rate for Chlorella sorokiniana occurred with 5 or 15 mg/L nitrogen supplementation.
Optimal growth conditions for Lemna minor were found with 5 mg/L nitrogen and 1.7 mg/L phosphorus.
Lemna minor contained high levels of lutein (up to 1378 mg/kg) and chlorophyll (up to 1518 mg/kg).
Chlorella sorokiniana had higher concentrations of aluminum, calcium, and magnesium compared to Lemna minor.
Both organisms accumulated essential metals, but some toxic metal levels exceeded statutory food product limits.

AI simplified

Microalgae and macrophytes are commonly used as human and animal food supplements. We examined the cultivation of the microalgae Chlorella sorokiniana and the duckweed Lemna minor in thermal waters under batch and sequencing batch conditions and we characterized the produced biomass for the presence of essential nutrients as well as for heavy metals and radioisotope content. The highest specific growth rate for the microalgae was observed when 5 or 15 mg/L N were supplemented while the optimal conditions for Lemna minor were observed in the co-presence of 5 mg/L N and 1.7 mg/L P. Lemna minor presented higher concentrations of proteins and lipids comparing to the studied microalgae. Both organisms contained high amounts of lutein (up to 1378 mg/kg for Lemna minor) and chlorophyll (up to 1518 mg/kg for Lemna minor) while β-carotene and tocopherols were found at lower concentrations, not exceeding a few tens of mg/kg. The heavy metal content varied between the two species. Lemna minor accumulated more Cd, Cu, K, Mn, Na, Ni, and Zn whereas Al, Ca and Mg were higher in Chlorella sorokiniana. Both organisms could be a significant source of essential metals but the occasional exceedance of the statutory levels of toxic metals in food products raises concern for potential risk to either humans or animals. Application of gamma-spectroscopy to quantify the effective dose to humans fromRa,Ra andK showed that Chlorella sorokiniana was well under the radiological limits while the collected mass of Lemna minor was too small for radiological measurements with confidence. 228 226 40

Full Text

Full text is available at the source.

View full text (XML) ↗View full text ↗

Cultivation of the macrophyte Lemna minor and the microalgae Chlorella sorokiniana in thermal mineral waters: Biomass characteristics, radioisotopes and heavy metals content

Abstract

Full Text

You found one interesting study. We’ll send the next 7.

what lands in your inbox each week:

Recent issues from the circadian biology brief

Abstract

Full Text

Related papers

You found one interesting study. We’ll send the next 7.

what lands in your inbox each week:

Recent issues from the circadian biology brief