Full text is available at the source.
Abstract
Composite scoring models achieved 90.12% accuracy in diagnosing Long COVID.
- Machine-learning models that consider both symptom frequency and severity show better performance than those that only focus on symptom occurrence.
- Occurrence-based models achieved 88.73% accuracy, suggesting room for improvement in diagnostic precision.
- Composite models required fewer predictive symptoms, indicating they may be more efficient for classification.
- Assessing symptom burden is linked to enhanced precision in research classifications of Long COVID.
Simplified