Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation

Views of People with Long COVID on Online Physical Rehabilitation

Updated

Abstract

Essence

People with long COVID generally described an 8-week virtual physical rehabilitation program as supportive and helpful, while still facing fatigue and return-to-work barriers.

Evidence

The evidence is a qualitative descriptive study of semistructured videoconference interviews with 13 intervention-group adults from a randomized trial of tailored virtual rehabilitation.

Caveat

The findings reflect perspectives from only program completers in the intervention arm, so they do not measure comparative effectiveness or capture non-completer experiences.

Simplified

Full Text

We can’t show the full text here under this license.

Funding

Competing interests

J.B. reports financial relationships with AstraZeneca, the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR), GSK, Novartis, Sanofi, Réseau en santé respiratoire (RSR) Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé (FRQS), Fonds de recherche du Quebec (FRQ), Trudel, the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) Foundation, American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST), Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS), Roche, Pfizer, Canadian Lung Association (CLA), and Respiplus. M.S.’s employer, Respiplus, a nonprofit society, has received sponsorship in the form of educational grants for the development of programs in the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) field, including from AstraZeneca, GSK, Moderna, and Pfizer. R.Z. has a financial relationship with WillKin Health. The other authors have nothing to disclose.
PubMed

What Lands in Your Inbox Each Week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free