BACKGROUND: The role of cuproptosis, an emerging cell death pathway that makes a remarkable contribution to tumor progression, remains elusive in osteosarcoma (OS), in addition to its regulator, including long-no-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) that are also a critical factor for fueling OS.
METHODS: Transcriptome and clinical data from 70 normal human bone tissue samples and 84 frozen clinical osteosarcoma samples were included in this study. Cuproptosis-associated lncRNAs (CRlncs) were identified through differential expression and co-expression analyses. Univariate Cox regression was performed to screen for prognostic lncRNAs, then we used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression to distinguish prognosis-related CRlncs (AC083900.1 and RP11-283C24.1) for modeling the CRlncs prognostic signature (CLPS) by multivariate Cox regression using the stepwise method. CLPS performance was tested by independent prognostic analyses, survival curve and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. In addition, the molecular and immune mechanisms that underlie the unfavorable prognosis of CLPS-identified high-risk group were elucidated.
RESULT: AC083900.1 and RP11-283C24.1 have been identified as the most important CRlncs for OS progression (hazard ratio: 3.498 and 2.724, respectively), and the derived CLPS demonstrated outstanding performance for the prediction of OS prognosis (AUC of 0.799 and 0.778 in the training and test sets, both adj-p < 0.05 in survival curve). As was anticipated, CLPS also outperformed a recent clinical prognostic approach that only achieved an AUC of 0.682 [metastasis]. It is notable that AC083900.1 progressed OS metastasis, evidenced by its high expression in metastatic OS, its high correlation to metastasis-related genes, and its high AUC of 0.683 for the prediction of metastasis. Mechanistically, AC083900.1 and RP11-283C24.1 dysregulated many critical biological processes regarding humoral immune response, immunoglobulin complex, etc.; while reducing the infiltration of many cytotoxic immune cells (B-cells, TIL, neutrophils, etc.). It is encouraging that BMS-509744 and KIN001-135 demonstrated high therapeutic implications for CLPS-identified high-risk OS, and the low-risk counterpart was sensitive to SB-216763. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed that both AC083900.1 and RP11-283C24.1 were significantly upregulated in different osteosarcoma cell lines.
CONCLUSION: This study elucidated the roles and mechanisms of AC083900.1 and RP11-283C24.1 in the development of OS, fostering a reliable prognostic approach and treatment for OS patients.
