BACKGROUND: Individuals with mental disorders face excess morbidity and premature mortality. Accelerated ageing has been proposed as a contributing mechanism but population-scale evidence across diverse diagnoses is limited.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether metabolomic ageing differs across mental disorders and whether associations vary by sex, age group and genetic liability.
METHODS: Using plasma metabolomic profiles from UK Biobank participants, we applied a metabolomic ageing clock (MileAge) to estimate disorder-specific differences between metabolite-predicted and chronological age. Mental disorders were ascertained from health records and self-reported physician diagnoses. We analysed nine diagnostic groups and 45 individual disorders and assessed sex and age group differences and associations with polygenic scores.
FINDINGS: Among 225 212 participants (54% female; mean age 56.97), 38 524 had a diagnosis preceding baseline. Substance use, psychotic, affective and neurotic disorders were associated with a metabolite-predicted age older than chronological age, largest for psychosis (β=0.556, 95% CI 0.250 to 0.861, p<0.001). Obsessive-compulsive and eating disorders were associated with a metabolite-predicted age younger than chronological age. Several associations were stronger in males and in individuals aged <65 years. Higher genetic liability to depression, autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder predicted an older metabolomic age (β range=0.020 to 0.047), whereas polygenic scores for psychosis and tobacco use disorder predicted a younger metabolomic age (β range=-0.023 to -0.040). For obsessive-compulsive disorder and anorexia nervosa, clinical and genetic associations indicated younger metabolomic ageing.
CONCLUSIONS: Metabolomic ageing in mental disorders is heterogeneous. While many disorders are associated with an older biological age, some are linked to a younger biological age. Divergence between genetic liability and clinical phenotypes suggests that non-genetic factors shape biological ageing differences.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Biological age should not be assumed to uniformly exceed chronological age across mental disorders. Sex and age-specific approaches could improve understanding of biological ageing processes in psychiatry.