Monthly sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine versus dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy: a double-blind, randomised, controlled, superiority trial

Mar 27, 2019Lancet (London, England)

Monthly sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for preventing malaria during pregnancy: a double-blind, randomised trial

AI simplified

Abstract

A total of 782 women were enrolled, with no significant difference in adverse birth outcomes between the two treatment groups.

  • The risk of composite adverse birth outcomes was similar for both dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (16%) and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (18%) treatments.
  • Protective efficacy for dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine was calculated at 12% (95% CI -23 to 37), with a p-value of 0.45.
  • Both drug regimens were well tolerated, showing no significant differences in adverse events overall.
  • Asymptomatic corrected QT interval prolongation was significantly higher in the dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group compared to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.

AI simplified

Full Text

Full text is available at the source.

what lands in your inbox each week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free