What this is
- This research evaluates the safety of () using mefloquine (MQ) vs. sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP).
- It follows 4,247 infants born to women receiving either treatment until 12 months of age.
- Key outcomes assessed include infant mortality, morbidity, nutritional status, and psychomotor development.
Essence
- No significant differences were found in infant mortality, morbidity, or nutritional outcomes between infants born to mothers receiving with MQ vs. SP. However, certain were less frequently achieved in the MQ group at 9 months.
Key takeaways
- Infants born to mothers receiving with MQ and SP showed similar rates of stunting, underweight, wasting, and severe acute malnutrition at all follow-up visits.
- At 9 months, infants in the MQ group were more likely to be unable to stand without help, walk without support, and bring solid food to their mouth compared to those in the SP group.
- Incidences of malaria, anemia, hospital admissions, outpatient visits, and mortality were comparable between the two groups throughout the study.
Caveats
- A limitation was that 26% of infants did not complete the study, which could affect the generalizability of the findings.
- The open-label design may introduce biases, particularly in assessing psychomotor development outcomes.
Definitions
- Intermittent Preventive Treatment of malaria in pregnancy (IPTp): A strategy involving the administration of antimalarial drugs at scheduled intervals during pregnancy to prevent malaria.
- Psychomotor development milestones: Key developmental skills related to movement and coordination, including gross and fine motor skills.
AI simplified
Introduction
Malaria infection in pregnancy is a significant public health problem in endemic regions, especially in sub-Saharan Africa, where there are nearly 30 million pregnancies at risk of infection every year [1]. Maternal infection is an important contributor to anemia and low birth weight (LBW), as well as to overall morbidity and mortality in both the mother and the infant [2–15]. To prevent maternal infection in malaria endemic areas in Africa, WHO recommends the use of insecticide-treated bed nets and the administration of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (IPTp) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) [16]. Prevention of malaria with IPTp with SP has been shown to reduce LBW deliveries, neonatal mortality, and maternal morbidity [5,6,11,12,16–18]. However, the spread of SP parasite resistance in sub-Saharan Africa has raised concerns regarding its long-term use for IPTp, and alternative drugs are being evaluated.
Despite the emergence of resistance to mefloquine (MQ) in parts of Southeast Asia, MQ retains high antimalarial activity in Africa and has been shown to be effective both for malaria treatment in pregnancy and for preventing malaria infection in all trimesters [19–21]. Concerns that have been raised about its safety in pregnancy have not been confirmed, and MQ is among the very few antimalarials considered safe throughout pregnancy and is recommended by WHO and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for chemoprophylaxis in non-immune pregnant women of all gestational ages traveling to malaria endemic regions [22,23]. It has also been recently reclassified as pregnancy category B by the US Food and Drug Administration and was proved to be safe in pregnancy in a recent systematic review [24,25].
It is recommended that clinical research involving pregnant women include a plan to monitor the outcome of the pregnancy as well as the short- and long-term health status of the child [26]; however, follow-up of children is rarely done in most African settings, mainly because of the difficulties of carrying out adequate monitoring. In the case of malaria, little is known about the effects of preventive interventions against malaria during pregnancy on the infant’s health. Only two trials in Southeast Asia have assessed the effect of MQ administration during pregnancy on the offspring’s health over the first month of life. In one study MQ was compared with placebo for malaria prophylaxis, and in the other trial MQ combined with artesunate (AS) was compared with quinine for treatment of malaria episodes. In neither study was an increased risk of adverse health, growth, or developmental outcomes in infants born to women receiving MQ in pregnancy reported [27,28].
We recently reported the results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing MQ and SP for IPTp and evaluating the tolerability of two different MQ regimens in pregnant women in four sub-Saharan countries [29]. Women taking MQ were found to have fewer episodes of clinical malaria than SP recipients, and pregnancy outcomes and safety profiles were similar in both groups. However, drug tolerability was worse for MQ than for SP, even when splitting MQ doses over 2 d. Infants born to women participating in the trial were followed up until 12 mo of age. We report here the nutritional outcomes, psychomotor development, morbidity, and survival of infants born to women receiving either MQ or SP as IPTp.
Methods
Ethics Statement and Participants’ Safety
As previously described [29], the study protocol and informed consent forms were reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (Spain), the Comité Consultatif de Déontologie et d’Éthique of the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (France), and all local regulatory authorities and national ethics review committees of each country participating in the study (S1 Table). The trial was conducted under the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki and in accordance with good clinical practices guidelines set up by WHO and by the International Conference on Harmonization. An independent data safety monitoring board was created prior to the beginning of the trial and regularly reviewed and monitored the safety data collected. The trial was registered prior to the enrollment of the first participant in both ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00811421↗) and the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR2010020001429343).
Study Area and Population
The study was conducted between September 2009 and January 2013 in four sub-Saharan countries: Benin (Allada, Sékou, and Attogon), Gabon (Lambaréné and Fougamou), Tanzania (Makole and Chamwino), and Mozambique (Manhiça).
Study Design
Details of the study have been reported elsewhere [29]. A total of 4,749 pregnant women were enrolled into a randomized open-label three-arm trial to compare MQ with SP as IPTp for the prevention of the adverse effects of malaria during pregnancy and to compare the tolerability of two different MQ administration regimens in the context of long-lasting insecticide-treated bed net use. The three study arms were (1) IPTp with SP, (2) IPTp with MQ (15 mg/kg) given once as a full dose, and (3) IPTp with MQ (15 mg/kg) split over 2 d. The primary objective of the trial was to assess the safety and efficacy of the study drugs in pregnancy, independently of the dose regimen, as detailed in the study protocol (S1 Text). There were 4,247 live births born to the trial participants, 1,432 born to women in the SP group and 2,815 born to women in the MQ group; the infants were followed up until 12 mo of age. Assessment of the effect of the administration of MQ versus SP in the mother on the infant’s health and survival was also included as a trial objective.
Study Procedures
Enrollment of pregnant women
All pregnant women attending a participating antenatal clinic for the first time were screened for eligibility to participate in the study. Inclusion criteria were the following: permanent residence in the study area; gestational age ≤ 28 weeks; negative HIV test at recruitment; absence of history of allergy to sulfa drugs or MQ; absence of history of severe renal, hepatic, psychiatric, or neurological disease; and absence of MQ or halofantrine treatment in the preceding 4 wk. Women who met the inclusion criteria and signed an informed consent form were randomized to the SP group and received standard IPTp (three tablets of the fixed combination therapy containing 500 mg of sulfadoxine and 25 mg of pyrimethamine; Malastop, Sterop) or to the MQ group and received 15 mg/kg of MQ (tablets of 250 mg of MQ base; Lariam, Roche). The number of tablets for MQ was calculated according to body weight. For women allocated to the MQ split-dose group, the 15-mg/kg dose was divided into two halves and administered over two consecutive days, with the second half dose administered either at the antenatal clinic or at home by study personnel.
Infant follow-up
After delivery, live births were given a study number different from that of the mother in order to be uniquely identified. Women were asked to bring their children to the study health facility when the babies were 1 mo of age or coinciding with the first Expanded Program on Immunization visit at 6 wk, and also at 9 and 12 mo of age. At each visit, the baby’s weight and length were recorded, and psychomotor development was evaluated following a simplified adapted protocol that included assessment of gross and fine motor skills, language, audition, and social skills [30]. Participants who did not attend scheduled study visits were visited at home and encouraged to attend the health facility for completion of study visits. Throughout the follow-up, infants reporting sick at the health facility were seen by study health personnel. Unscheduled outpatient visits and hospital admissions were recorded in standardized questionnaires. A capillary blood sample was taken for malaria parasitemia examination and hemoglobin determination in infants who presented with fever or a history of fever in the last 24 h or who appeared pale. All children who did not attend the visit at 12 mo of age were visited at home to assess the infant’s residence and health status.
Laboratory Methods
Hemoglobin (Hb) was determined using mobile devices in capillary blood samples (HemoCue [Eurotrol] and Hemocontrol [EKF Diagnostics]). Thick and thin blood films were stained and read for Plasmodium species detection according to standard, quality-controlled procedures[31,32].
Data Management, Statistical Methods, and Definitions
The quality of data recorded in the study source documents and case report forms was monitored regularly following good clinical practices principles by the trials’ clinical monitor before the data were sent to the centralized database in Manhiça, Mozambique. Data were double-entered using OpenClinica Enterprise software for clinical data management. The analysis compared infants born to women receiving either SP or MQ, independently of the MQ regimen. The analysis was done on the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) cohort that included all live births born to women who met the inclusion criteria and had data on the outcomes of the main trial. The mITT analyses were adjusted by country. To include seasonality in the adjusted analysis, the duration of women’s recruitment was divided into eight periods, and the interaction terms between period of recruitment and country were included in the model, which allows modeling of the effect of period in each country independently.
Baseline characteristics of newborns at delivery were described using standard statistics. Proportions were compared between mother’s IPTp groups using Fisher’s exact test. Adjustments for covariates and possible confounders were made using logistic regression and robust estimates of the covariance (Huber method) using the method proposed by Zou [33]. Comparisons of proportions are presented as a relative risk (RR) or a reduction in the RR (1 − RR × 100%) if the RR is lower than 1. Continuous variables were compared between groups and adjusted for covariates and possible confounders using ordinary least squares regression. Main outcomes (nutritional outcomes; psychomotor development; incidences of clinical malaria, anemia, outpatient visits, and hospital admissions; and mortality) were compared between all children born to MQ recipients and SP recipients. Results with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, without allowance for multiple testing. Variables were transformed to the logarithm scale if normality was thereby improved. Nutritional analysis was adjusted by birth weight. z-Scores were calculated for the four WHO-recommended anthropometric indices to assess nutrition in infants: weight for age (underweight, severe acute malnutrition), height for age (stunting), weight for height (wasting), and mid-upper arm circumference, according to WHO standard definitions [34,35]. Participants with missing data were not included in the analysis. Clinical malaria was defined as fever (≥37. 5°C) or history of fever in the past 24 h or signs suggestive of malaria, reported through direct questioning in scheduled visits and active reporting in unscheduled visits, confirmed by a positive blood smear. Anemia was defined as Hb < 125 g/l in cord blood for neonates and Hb < 110 g/l in peripheral blood in infants. LBW was defined as birth weight < 2,500 g, and preterm as gestational age < 37 wk at delivery. The following psychomotor development milestones were assessed at each age: at 1 mo—(i) movement of four extremities symmetrically, (ii) muscle tone, (iii) following of objects, (iv) response to sounds, and (v) response to smiles; at 9 mo—(i) ability to sit without leaning, (ii) crawling, (iii) standing without help, (iv) walking without support, (v) grasping small objects, (vi) palm grasping, (vii) moving objects from one hand to the other, (viii) turning at voice, (ix) ability to say a word, and (x) bringing solid food to his/her mouth; and at 12 mo—(i) walking, (ii) pincer grasping, (iii) understanding orders, (iv) ability to say some words, and (v) drinking from a cup. Congenital abnormalities, hospital admissions, and deaths were considered serious adverse events (SAEs) and were confirmed and reported in specific questionnaires by a study clinician and notified to the sponsor and the data safety monitoring board. Diagnoses for the SAE reporting were codified using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred term and system organ class coding system [36]. Incidences of clinical malaria, anemia, infant mortality, hospital admissions, and outpatient attendances were estimated as the number of episodes per person over the time at risk. Time at risk was defined as the time from the start of follow-up (day of birth) until the end of follow-up (visit at 12 mo) or withdrawal due to censoring or death, whichever occurred first. In order to avoid counting twice the same episode of clinical malaria, participants did not contribute to the denominator or numerator during an arbitrary period of 28 d after an event of clinical malaria was confirmed. For hospital admissions and outpatient attendances, a maximum of one episode per day was allowed. Infant mortality rate was defined as the number of deaths per 1,000 live births per year at risk. The total number of events was compared between groups using negative binomial regression to take into account a possible extra Poisson variation due to different frailty of the participants. The mortality comparison is expressed as a relative rate. Study completion was defined as attendance to visit 3 at 12 mo of age, independently of completing the other previous study visits. Data analysis was performed using Stata version 13 (Stata Corporation).
Results
Baseline Characteristics of Study Participants
Fig 1 shows the trial profile of the mITT cohort that is the basis of this study. Overall, there were 2,815 and 1,432 live births born to mothers receiving IPTp with MQ and SP, respectively. The study follow-up was completed by 73% (2,054) of babies born to women allocated to the MQ group and by 74% (1,055) of those born to women in the SP group. Reasons for not completing the study were death (4% of total study population), withdrawal (6%), migration (8%), and loss to follow-up (9%). Infants who did not complete the study were similar at birth to those who did, except that they were in a lower proportion from Benin (17%), had a smaller mean head circumference (33.67 cm), a greater median gestational age (40 wk), and a lower proportion of cord blood anemia (8.8%) (S5 Table).
Baseline characteristics were similar for both study groups. Overall, mean prevalence of cord blood anemia, malaria parasitemia, and LBW was 10.6%, 0.3%, and 12.0%, respectively, with no significant differences between groups. Median gestational age at birth was 39 wk (interquartile range 38.4; 40.8), and congenital abnormalities were found in 46 (1.1%) live births (1.2% in the MQ group and 1.0% in the SP group); of these congenital abnormalities, 36 were detected at delivery, and ten during follow-up, with no significant differences between groups (Table 1).
Trial profile (modified intention-to-treat cohort). Number of women recruited at first antenatal visit who did not attend the rest of the study visits but delivered at the maternity ward and for whom information on pregnancy outcome is available.Number of women who delivered before receiving second IPTp dose. a b
| Characteristic | MQ Group | SP Group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Value | N | Value | |
| Live births by country | ||||
| Benin | 2,815 | 719 (25.5%) | 1,432 | 370 (25.8%) |
| Gabon | 2,815 | 663 (23.6%) | 1,432 | 338 (23.6%) |
| Mozambique | 2,815 | 736 (26.1%) | 1,432 | 375 (26.2%) |
| Tanzania | 2,815 | 697 (24.8%) | 1,432 | 349 (24.4%) |
| Male | 2,815 | 1,414 (50.2%) | 1,432 | 718 (50.1%) |
| Weight (g) | 2,791 | 3,016 (501) | 1,423 | 3,017 (486) |
| Length (cm) | 2,724 | 48 (4) | 1,382 | 48 (5) |
| Head circumference (cm) | 2,722 | 34 (2) | 1,380 | 34 (2) |
| Cord blood anemia 001 | 2,815 | 304 (10.8%) | 1,432 | 145 (10.1%) |
| Cord blood parasitemia blood smear positive | 2,618 | 6 (0.2%) | 1,324 | 4 (0.3%) |
| Gestational age (wk) 001 001 , | 1,924 | 39.2 (38.4; 40.4) | 980 | 39.6 (38.4; 40.8) |
| Premature 001 001 001 , , | 1,924 | 121 (6.3%) | 980 | 56 (5.7%) |
| LBW 001 | 2,791 | 338 (12.1%) | 1,424 | 167(11.7%) |
| Congenital abnormality 001 | 2,815 | 29 (1.0%) | 1,432 | 17 (1.2%) |
Nutritional Outcomes
There were no significant differences between the groups at any of the scheduled study visits in the proportion of children who were stunted, underweight, wasted, or with severely acute malnutrition. There was a non-significant increase from the first study visit at 1 mo of age to the last study visit at 12 mo of age in the prevalence of children who were stunted or wasted. The proportion of children who were underweight at 12 mo (25.7% in the MQ group and 26.1% in the SP group) was four times greater than the proportion who were underweight at 1 mo of age (7.7% in the MQ group and 6.8% in the SP group, odds ratio 4.31, 95% CI 2.28–3.51, p < 0.001) (Table 2).
| Outcome | MQ Group | SP Group | RR (95% CI) | -Valuep | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | (Percent)n | N | (Percent)n | |||
| 1 mo | ||||||
| Stunting | 2,296 | 268 (11.7%) | 1,146 | 149 (13.0%) | 0.90 (0.71–1.09) | 0.243 |
| Underweight | 2,323 | 178 (7.7%) | 1,150 | 78 (6.8%) | 1.13 (0.86–1.49) | 0.369 |
| Wasting | 2,250 | 246 (10.9%) | 1,135 | 120 (10.6%) | 1.03 (0.84–1.27) | 0.746 |
| Severe acute malnutrition | 2,250 | 67 (3.0%) | 1,135 | 44 (3.9%) | 0.77 (0.53–1.12) | 0.166 |
| 9 mo | ||||||
| Stunting | 2,073 | 268 (12.9%) | 1,038 | 114 (11.0%) | 1.19 (0.97–1.47) | 0.101 |
| Underweight | 2,072 | 367 (17.7%) | 1,040 | 203 (19.5%) | 0.90 (0.77–1.05) | 0.198 |
| Wasting | 2,069 | 198 (9.6%) | 1,032 | 105 (10.2%) | 0.94 (0.75–1.17) | 0.563 |
| Severe acute malnutrition | 2,069 | 76 (3.7%) | 1,032 | 35 (3.4%) | 1.08 (0.73–1.60) | 0.703 |
| MUAC < 115 cm | 2,120 | 34 (1.6%) | 1,062 | 18 (1.7%) | 0.95 (0.52–1.73) | 0.867 |
| 12 mo | ||||||
| Stunting | 2,028 | 310 (15.3%) | 1,045 | 164 (15.7%) | 0.98 (0.82–1.16) | 0.798 |
| Underweight | 2,028 | 521 (25.7%) | 1,041 | 272 (26.1%) | 0.98 (0.86–1.11) | 0.72 |
| Wasting | 2,028 | 242 (11.9%) | 1,032 | 136 (13.2%) | 0.89 (0.74–1.09) | 0.257 |
| Severe acute malnutrition | 2,028 | 77 (3.8%) | 1,032 | 41 (4.0%) | 0.94 (0.65–1.36) | 0.748 |
| MUAC < 115 cm | 2,091 | 22 (1.1%) | 1,071 | 14 (1.3%) | 0.79 (0.39–1.59) | 0.512 |
Psychomotor Development
Among infants born to women in the MQ group, there was an increased risk of being unable to stand without help, walk without support, and bring solid food to the mouth at 9 mo of age compared to those children born to women in the SP group (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00–1.14, p = 0.040; RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01–1.21, p = 0.039; RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.03–1.70, p = 0.031, respectively), but not at 1 and 12 mo. No other significant differences were observed in the psychomotor development milestones assessed at the study visits (Table 3). Similar differences in the same psychomotor development items at 9 mo were found in both the according-to-protocol (ATP) and mITT analysis. In addition, no other associations were found in the rest of the items assessed or at the other study visits for the ATP group (S6 Table).
| Development Outcome | MQ Group | SP Group | RR (95% CI) | -Valuep | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | (Percent)n | N | (Percent)n | |||
| 1 mo | ||||||
| Unable to move four extremities symmetrically | 2,327 | 2 (0.1%) | 1,153 | 0 (0.0%) | — | 0.319 003 |
| Abnormal muscle tone | 2,324 | 7 (0.3%) | 1,153 | 0 (0.0%) | — | 0.104 003 |
| Unable to follow objects | 2,328 | 521 (22.4%) | 1,154 | 266 (23.1%) | 0.97 (0.86–1.09) | 0.569 |
| No response to sounds | 2,328 | 196 (8.4%) | 1,153 | 85 (7.4%) | 1.12 (0.90–1.04) | 0.32 |
| No response to smiles | 2,328 | 793 (34.1%) | 1,154 | 365 (31.6%) | 1.07 (0.98–1.18) | 0.122 |
| 9 mo | ||||||
| Unable to sit without leaning | 2,086 | 17 (0.8%) | 1,045 | 6 (0.6%) | 1.43 (0.56–3.66) | 0.46 |
| Unable to crawl | 2,087 | 190 (9.1%) | 1,045 | 90 (8.6%) | 1.06 (0.84–1.35) | 0.619 |
| Unable to stand without help | 2,084 | 1,231 (59.1%) | 1,045 | 576 (55.1%) | 1.07 (1.00–1.14) | 0.04 |
| Unable to walk without support | 2,085 | 881 (42.3%) | 1,045 | 403 (38.6%) | 1.10 (1.01–1.21). | 0.039 |
| Unable to grasp small objects | 2,086 | 30 (1.4%) | 1,045 | 16 (1.5%) | 0.94 (0.51–1.71) | 0.831 |
| Unable to do palm grasp | 2,084 | 13 (0.6%) | 1,045 | 12 (1.1%) | 0.54 (0.25–1.19) | 0.126 |
| Unable to move objects from one hand to the other | 2,086 | 86 (4.1%) | 1,044 | 42 (4.0%) | 1.04 (0.73–1.49) | 0.826 |
| No turn at voice | 2,086 | 9 (0.4%) | 1,045 | 4 (0.4%) | 1.13 (0.35–3.65) | 0.843 |
| Unable to say any word | 2,085 | 660 (31.7%) | 1,045 | 327 (31.3%) | 1.00 (0.91–1.10) | 0.95 |
| Unable to bring solid food to his/her mouth | 1,966 | 195 (9.9%) | 976 | 74 (7.6%) | 1.32 (1.03–1.70) | 0.031 |
| 12 mo | ||||||
| Unable to walk | 2,053 | 903 (44.0%) | 1,053 | 449 (42.6%) | 1.03 (0.94–1.12 | 0.547 |
| Unable to do pincer grasping | 2,051 | 77 (3.8%) | 1,054 | 26 (2.5%) | 1.52 (0.98–2.35) | 0.061 |
| Unable to understand orders | 2,052 | 184 (9.0%) | 1,054 | 96 (9.1%) | 0.96 (0.77–1.20) | 0.719 |
| Unable to say some words | 2,046 | 265 (13.0%) | 1,054 | 124 (11.8%) | 1.11 (0.91–1.35) | 0.322 |
| Unable to drink from a cup | 2,048 | 206 (10.1%) | 1,052 | 94 (8.9%) | 1.12 (0.88–1.41) | 0.353 |
Morbidity and Mortality
Throughout the study follow-up, the most common SAEs reported were infectious illnesses, and among these, the most frequently reported were malaria, pneumonia, and neonatal sepsis, with no significant differences between the two groups (S2 and S3 Tables). Nor was there any significant difference between the study groups in the incidence of clinical malaria (0.14 and 0.15 episodes per person per year at risk in the MQ and SP groups, respectively, p = 0.594). The incidence of outpatient visits was 0.65 episodes per person per year at risk in both groups. Hospital admissions were also very similar in children born to women who received MQ versus SP, with incidences of 0.09 and 0.10 admissions per person per year at risk, respectively. The infant mortality rate was 26.9 deaths per 1,000 live births per year at risk in both groups (Table 4). Overall, 61% of infant deaths occurred in the neonatal period, of which 43% took place in the first week of life, with no significant difference between the MQ and SP groups. The most common causes of death, with similar proportions in both groups, were non-cause-specific disorders (29%), infectious diseases (25%), respiratory diseases (21%), perinatal complications (9%), blood disorders (6%), congenital abnormalities (5%), and neurological diseases (3%) (S4 Table).
| Outcome | MQ Group | SP Group | Relative Rate (95% CI) | -Valuep | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /PYARN4 | Incidence | /PYARN | Incidence | |||
| Malaria | 377/2,712.9 | 0.14 | 205/1,388.7 | 0.15 | 0.95 (0.81–1.13) | 0.594 |
| Anemia 004 | 1,898/3,923.4 | 0.48 | 919/1,976.8 | 0.46 | 1.04 (0.96–1.12) | 0.354 |
| Hospital admissions | 206/2,401.3 | 0.09 | 123/1,221.2 | 0.1 | 0.85 (0.68–1.06) | 0.251 |
| Outpatient visits | 4,261/6,514.8 | 0.65 | 2,170/3,327.9 | 0.65 | 1.00 (0.95–1.05) | 0.886 |
| Mortality | 65/2,413.4 | 0.03 | 33/1,223.6 | 0.03 | 1.00 (0.66–1.51) | 0.985 |
Discussion
This study assessed the effects of MQ as IPTp compared to that of SP on health outcomes in cohorts of infants from four African countries (Benin, Gabon, Mozambique, and Tanzania). Nearly 4,000 infants born to women participating in a large randomized controlled trial assessing the safety and efficacy of IPTp with MQ compared to SP were followed until 12 mo of age. At all study visits, the prevalence of undernutrition in infants was similar between the study groups. Being able to stand without help, walk without support, and bring solid food to the mouth when assessed at 9 mo of age were the only developmental items found to be less frequently done by infants in the MQ group compared to those in the SP group. No significant differences were observed in any of the other developmental items assessed in the study visits at 1 mo, 9 mo, and 12 mo of age. Whether this result could be a chance finding due to multiple testing or related to maternal exposure to MQ during pregnancy would need to be further investigated. No significant differences were observed in the incidences of clinical malaria, anemia, hospital admissions, outpatient visits, or mortality between the groups.
There is very limited data on the impact of MQ in pregnancy on the infant’s health status. Previous trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of MQ in pregnancy in the African region assessed only pregnancy outcomes or followed up children only until 1 mo after birth [37–39]. Only two trials—one carried out in the Thai–Burmese border area comparing MQ with placebo for malaria prophylaxis in pregnant Karen women and the other, in the same area, comparing MQ combined with AS with quinine for malaria treatment—have reported children’s outcomes for the first 24 and 12 mo of life, respectively [27,28]. However, in the first study, MQ was given at a prophylactic dosage (2.5 mg of base/kg/wk), making it difficult to extrapolate the findings to higher treatment dosages. In the other study, the small sample size was insufficient to appropriately assess differences between groups. In the first trial, weight and weight gain at months 1, 3, 6, and 12 were similar in children born to women who received MQ and those born to women who received placebo [27]. In the second trial, infant growth outcomes were not assessed. An analysis of a case series of 72 American female soldiers who took weekly MQ prophylaxis without prior knowledge of their pregnancy status found that two out of the 13 live-born infants with available data were small for their ages [40]. Other than these studies, most of the safety data in children born to women who took MQ while pregnant come from the post-marketing surveillance system of the manufacturer (dominated by exposure as chemoprophylaxis) and from studies in Southeast Asia, none of which assessed the impact of MQ during pregnancy in children older than 1 mo of age [40–44].
Though controversy exists as to which indicator best defines undernutrition, the use of stunting (low height for age) seems to be the most appropriate, since it is a largely irreversible outcome and has long-term effects in individuals and societies [45]. The prevalence of stunting observed at 12 mo of age in this study is comparable to that found in other studies carried out in African populations [47–49]. More than a quarter of the children in both groups were underweight at 12 mo of age, which is consistent with figures reported from other low-income settings [50–53]. On the other hand, in both groups the prevalence of underweight increased with age from 1 to 12 mo. Although exclusive breast-feeding is considered sufficient to provide adequate nutrition and immunological protection to infants during the first 6 mo, the likely inadequacy, both in quantity and nutritional quality, of weaning foods, together with exposure to infectious diseases, may compromise the infants’ growth onwards [54–57].
While in high-income countries many tools have been developed and validated to evaluate children’s psychomotor development, there is a shortage of appropriate assessment tools for populations living in low-income settings [58,59]. In this study, an adapted and simplified test was used, which might be difficult to compare with that used in other studies [30]. In the two previously described trials carried out in Thailand, no significant differences were found in neurological development assessed by the Denver Developmental Screening Test at 24 mo of age between the children of women who received MQ-AS versus quinine for the treatment of malaria in pregnancy, and mean ages to sit and to crawl were significantly younger in the children of women given MQ versus placebo as malaria prophylaxis [27,28,60]. In contrast, in the current study, there was a higher proportion of children unable to perform certain developmental items at 9 mo of age in the MQ group compared to the SP group, though it is likely that this may be due to multiple testing rather than to true differences between the groups.
Several studies have evidenced an association of maternal malaria, especially placental infection, with increased risk of clinical malaria and overall mortality in infants [1,2,4,6,11,61–63]. Although pregnant women who received IPTp with MQ had a lower incidence of clinical malaria and placental infection than those who received SP, the incidence of malaria and the all-cause mortality rate among their children were similar between the two groups and consistent with results reported from other studies in sub-Saharan Africa and are similar to those estimated in the region for the same age group [2,14,29,38,39,64]. In the only trial assessing the impact of MQ in pregnancy on malaria and all-cause mortality in children, the mortality rate and incidence of malaria episodes were comparable in both groups (malaria prophylaxis with either MQ or placebo) [27].
The main strength of this study is that it provides carefully collected and detailed information on nutritional and developmental outcomes in a large number of African infants born to women who randomly received either MQ or SP as IPTp for malaria prevention. This is of relevance given the limited data available on the effect of MQ in pregnancy on the infant’s health. No previous trials to our knowledge have assessed the effect of MQ administration in African pregnant women on the infant’s health. The results are also important because drug combinations containing MQ are currently recommended for malaria treatment in pregnancy, and MQ alone is recommended for prophylaxis in pregnant women traveling to endemic countries. A limitation of the study was that more than a quarter of infants did not complete the study, though only 9% of them were lost to follow-up. It has been previously noted that loss to follow-up in infants is a potential operational challenge for implementation of preventive programs and for performance of observational studies in this age group in sub-Saharan Africa [65–67]. The proportion of deaths in the first year of life in our study was similar in the two study groups and lower than the 6% UNICEF estimate for the African region [68]. It is common practice in rural Africa for women to move to their parents’ house to give birth, often in a different village. After delivery they move back to their home village, which might explain the migrations during infancy that caused some participants to not complete the study. The baseline characteristics of infants who did not complete the study were similar to those of children who did so, except for the country distribution, which could be explained by the particularities of each site’s follow-up methodology. We did not find any significant difference regarding newborn physical characteristics between those infants who completed the study and those who did not, supporting that infants who did not complete the study did not have an underlying condition or an increased frequency of adverse events that could have influenced the results in one way or another. On the other hand, the open-label design might have led to biases in the assessment of the outcomes, especially of psychomotor development, since MQ is often associated with neurological adverse events. However, it is difficult to rule out or confirm that this could have affected the study results. Children were uniquely identified by a different study number from that of the mother, and were examined by different study personnel, who did not have access to the mother’s study arm allocation. Only study personnel who administered the study interventions to the women were aware of the drug they were providing to the participants, and in general women did not know whether they had received MQ or SP.
In conclusion, these results indicate that administration of 15 mg/kg of MQ as IPTp compared to SP as IPTp in pregnant women is not associated with increased risks of infant mortality, morbidity, and undernutrition. This is of particular relevance considering that antimalarial drug combinations containing MQ are currently recommended for malaria treatment in pregnancy, and MQ alone is recommended for prophylaxis in pregnant women traveling to endemic countries [22,23]. In the current study there was a higher proportion of children unable to perform certain developmental items at 9 mo of age in the MQ group compared to the SP group. Though this finding is interesting and may call for further studies in children whose mothers are exposed to MQ during pregnancy, it cannot be ruled out that it might be explained by the multiple testing or open design of the study.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the women who participated in the study. We thank the study staff in the Malaria in Pregnancy Preventive Alternative Drugs (MiPPAD) partner sites—Allada, Attogon, Sékou (Benin); Fougamou, Lambaréné (Gabon); Manhiça, Maragra (Mozambique); and Chamwino and Makole (Tanzania)—for their dedication throughout the study. We wish to thank Arsenio Nhacolo for data management, Clinical Monitor Daniel Iñiguez, Project Assistant Montserrat Pi-Boixadera, the MiPPAD Safety Monitoring Team—Alberto L. García-Basteiro, Anna Llupià, and Laia Sánchez from the Barcelona Centre for International Health Research (Spain)—Elena del Cacho, Carles Codina from the Pharmacy Department, as well as Jaume Ordi and Mercé Bosch from the Pathology Department of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (Spain).
Abbreviations
Data Availability
Data cannot be made publicly available due to ethical restrictions and restrictions in the consent forms signed by participants. Data are available to researchers upon request. Requests should be submitted to the Malaria in Pregnancy Preventive Alternative Drugs (MiPPAD) executive committee (for more information please refer to http://www.isglobal.org/↗).
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the European Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP; IP.2007.31080.002), the Malaria in Pregnancy Consortium and the following national agencies: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI08/0564), Spain; Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF FKZ: da01KA0803), Germany; Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), France. CANTAM provided infrastructure help in the study. RG and MRu were partially supported by grants from the Spanish Ministry of Health (ref. CM07/0015 and CM11/00278, respectively). The CISM receives core funding from the Spanish Agency for International Cooperation (AECI). LLITNs (Permanet) were donated by Vestergaard Fransen. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
Associated Data
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data cannot be made publicly available due to ethical restrictions and restrictions in the consent forms signed by participants. Data are available to researchers upon request. Requests should be submitted to the Malaria in Pregnancy Preventive Alternative Drugs (MiPPAD) executive committee (for more information please refer to http://www.isglobal.org/↗).