Multi-omics integration reveals gut microbiota dysbiosis and metabolic alterations of cerebrospinal fluid in children with epilepsy

Sep 29, 2025Frontiers in microbiology

Combined biological analyses show gut bacteria imbalance and changes in spinal fluid metabolism in children with epilepsy

AI simplified

Abstract

Children with epilepsy exhibited distinct , with 13 discriminatory microbial taxa identified.

  • Multivariable modeling showed significant differences in metabolic pathways between epilepsy groups.
  • Key metabolic shifts were observed in , including alterations in alpha-Ketoisocaproic acid and acetyl-L-carnitine.
  • Strong associations were found between gut microbiota and metabolites, indicating their interconnected roles in epilepsy.
  • An integrated model using both microbial and metabolic data achieved an AUC of 0.953 and accuracy of 0.875 in distinguishing refractory from non-epilepsy patients.

AI simplified

Key numbers

0.953
of Integrated Model
Area Under the Curve for the classification model
23
Key Metabolites Identified
Number of discriminatory metabolites in analysis
13
Microbial Taxa Associated with Epilepsy
Number of taxa identified through multivariable association modeling

Key figures

Figure 7
Participant groups and multi-omics workflow for gut microbiota and metabolite analysis in epilepsy
Highlights stronger classification accuracy using integrated microbiota and metabolite data in epilepsy diagnosis
fmicb-16-1630062-g0007
  • Panel Top
    Participant groups: (23), (17), and (10) with stool and CSF sample collection
  • Panel Left Middle
    Microbiota analysis of stool samples (n=50) showing with trend down and distinct
  • Panel Left Bottom
    Classification model using distinguishes CEP vs NEP (=0.906) and REP vs NEP (AUC=0.913)
  • Panel Right Middle
    Metabolomics analysis of CSF samples (n=24) showing metabolic dysregulation with increased alpha-Ketoisocaproic and alpha-Ketoisovaleric acids and decreased acetyl-L-carnitine
  • Panel Right Bottom
    Classification model using random forest distinguishes REP vs NEP (AUC=0.875)
  • Panel Bottom
    Microbiota-metabolite integration shows significant correlations (10 genera and 4 metabolites) and an integrated random forest model classifies REP vs NEP with AUC=0.976
Figure 1
Gut microbiota composition and diversity in non-epilepsy, common epilepsy, and refractory epilepsy groups
Highlights distinct gut microbiota diversity and composition differences, with stronger microbial associations in refractory epilepsy
fmicb-16-1630062-g0001
  • Panel A
    Rarefaction curves showing across samples with sequencing depth; group curves appear higher than
  • Panel B
    Relative abundances of major bacterial phyla in each group with distinct color-coded phyla proportions
  • Panel C
    Ternary plot illustrating microbial community composition differences among , CEP, and REP groups with points sized by abundance
  • Panel D
    Hierarchical clustering dendrogram of microbial communities based on weighted UniFrac distances showing group clustering
  • Panel E
    Bar plots comparing indices (Pielou evenness, Richness, Shannon) across groups with significant differences marked by letters
  • Panel F
    plot of based on Bray-Curtis distance showing significant microbial composition differences; REP group appears more dispersed
  • Panel G
    analysis showing microbial taxa associations with REP and CEP diagnoses by abundance and prevalence, with heatmap of covariate significance
Figure 2
Gut microbiota functional pathways, ecological functions, and predicted phenotypes in , , and groups
Highlights distinct metabolic functions and phenotype proportions with lower aerobic bacteria in CEP versus other groups
fmicb-16-1630062-g0002
  • Panel A
    plot of -predicted functional pathways showing overlapping clusters with no significant overall differences among NEP, CEP, and REP groups
  • Panel B
    Bar graph of differential functional pathways with relative abundances and significant differences in pathways like carbohydrate metabolism and flavonoid biosynthesis across NEP, CEP, and REP
  • Panel C
    Heatmap and bar chart of ecological functions from showing metabolic functions and relative abundances, with some functions like human pathogens and nitrogen respiration differing significantly among groups
  • Panels D and E
    Predicted bacterial phenotypes from showing aerobic (Panel D) and anaerobic (Panel E) phenotype proportions at the phylum level, with aerobic proportion visibly lower in CEP compared to NEP and REP
Figure 3
Gut microbial genera differences and classification model performance in epilepsy and non-epilepsy groups
Highlights stronger classification accuracy and distinct microbial signatures in refractory epilepsy versus non-epilepsy samples.
fmicb-16-1630062-g0003
  • Panel A
    Differential gut microbial genera between common epilepsy () and non-epilepsy () ranked by and shown with ; bar colors indicate bacterial phylum.
  • Panel B
    for CEP vs NEP classifier with of 0.906 indicating model performance.
  • Panel C
    distribution for AUC in CEP vs NEP model showing empirical p-value of 0.
  • Panel D
    Permutation test distribution for accuracy in CEP vs NEP model showing empirical p-value of 0 and accuracy of 0.852.
  • Panel E
    Precision-Recall (PR) curve for CEP vs NEP model with AUC of 0.942.
  • Panel F
    Differential gut microbial genera between refractory epilepsy () and NEP ranked by random forest importance and shown with relative abundance; bar colors indicate bacterial phylum.
  • Panel G
    ROC curve for REP vs NEP classifier with AUC of 0.913.
  • Panel H
    Permutation test distribution for AUC in REP vs NEP model showing empirical p-value of 0.
  • Panel I
    Permutation test distribution for accuracy in REP vs NEP model showing empirical p-value of 0.002 and accuracy of 0.818.
  • Panel J
    Precision-Recall (PR) curve for REP vs NEP model with AUC of 0.965.
Figure 4
Metabolic profiles and pathway differences in of refractory epilepsy versus non-epilepsy groups
Highlights distinct metabolic signatures and pathway alterations in cerebrospinal fluid of refractory epilepsy compared to non-epilepsy
fmicb-16-1630062-g0004
  • Panel A
    Donut chart classifying all annotated metabolites by categories, with organic acids and derivatives as the largest group (29.56%)
  • Panel B
    plot showing metabolic variation between and groups with overlapping but partially separated clusters
  • Panel C
    score plot illustrating distinct clustering of REP and NEP samples, with REP samples visibly more clustered
  • Panel D
    histogram validating PLS-DA model classification accuracy of 0.847 with empirical p-value 0.044
  • Panel E
    Bar graph of important metabolites with scores > 1 identified by PLS-DA, highlighting 2-Hydroxyvaleric acid as highest
  • Panel F
    Pathway analysis plot showing metabolic pathways impacted in REP versus NEP, with alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism having highest impact and significance
1 / 5

Full Text

What this is

  • This research investigates the relationship between gut microbiota, () metabolites, and epilepsy in children.
  • It employs a multi-omics approach, integrating fecal microbiome analysis and metabolomics to identify potential biomarkers.
  • The study focuses on children with common epilepsy (CEP), refractory epilepsy (REP), and non-epilepsy (NEP) controls.

Essence

  • Children with epilepsy show distinct and altered metabolite profiles. Integrating these insights enhances diagnostic accuracy, suggesting microbiota-metabolite interactions are crucial in epilepsy.

Key takeaways

  • was observed in both REP and CEP groups, with 13 microbial taxa identified as significantly associated with epilepsy. This highlights the potential role of gut bacteria in epilepsy pathology.
  • metabolomics revealed significant metabolic alterations in REP compared to NEP, with 23 key metabolites identified, including citric acid and acetyl-L-carnitine, linked to neuronal excitability.
  • An integrated model combining microbial and metabolite data achieved an AUC of 0.953 and an accuracy of 0.875, outperforming individual models, indicating the potential for improved diagnostic strategies.

Caveats

  • The sample size was limited, particularly for paired analyses, which may affect the robustness of the findings. Larger cohorts are needed for validation.
  • samples were not collected from CEP patients due to clinical practices, limiting direct comparisons across epilepsy subtypes.
  • The control group included children with functional headaches, which may introduce confounding factors in the metabolomic analysis.

Definitions

  • gut microbiota dysbiosis: An imbalance in the microbial communities in the gut, which may affect health and disease.
  • cerebrospinal fluid (CSF): A clear fluid surrounding the brain and spinal cord, important for diagnosing neurological conditions.

AI simplified

what lands in your inbox each week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free