We canβt show the full text here under this license. Use the link below to read it at the source.
Association of non-traditional lipid indices with diabetes and insulin resistance in US adults: mediating effects of HOMA-IR and evidence from a national cohort
Non-traditional blood fat measures linked to diabetes and insulin resistance in US adults, with insulin resistance partly explaining this connection
AI simplified
Abstract
15.0% of participants in the study had diabetes.
- Four lipid indices, excluding CRI-II and EsdLDL-C, were linked with diabetes after adjustment.
- The (AIP) and (RC) were associated with significantly increased diabetes risk, with odds ratios of 2.52 and 2.13, respectively, for the highest versus lowest quartiles.
- All lipid indices showed dose-dependent associations with insulin resistance (IR), with AIP and RC displaying the strongest links, having odds ratios of 5.74 and 4.09, respectively.
- AIP and RC demonstrated high diagnostic performance for diabetes (AUC: 0.824 and 0.822) compared to other lipid indices, but were less effective than fasting glucose and HbA1c.
- AIP and RC also showed superior diagnostic capability for IR (AUC: 0.837 and 0.830) among lipid indices, comparable to traditional IR assessment methods.
- Mediation analysis indicated that HOMA-IR accounted for a significant portion of the associations between AIP/RC and diabetes, particularly in older adults, males, and those with a higher BMI.
AI simplified
Key numbers
2.52
Increase in Diabetes Risk ()
Odds ratio for diabetes in highest quartile of vs. lowest
2.13
Increase in Diabetes Risk ()
Odds ratio for diabetes in highest quartile of vs. lowest
5.74
Odds Ratio for Insulin Resistance ()
Odds ratio for insulin resistance associated with