Full text is available at the source.
Percutaneous mesh-container-plasty for osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fractures: A prospective, nonrandomized comparative study
Using a mesh container technique to treat collapsed spine fractures from osteoporosis: A forward-looking comparison study
AI simplified
Abstract
Both percutaneous mesh-container-plasty (PMCP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) significantly reduced pain and improved function, but PMCP showed better outcomes in specific metrics.
- Visual pain scores decreased from 7 to 2 in both PMCP and PKP groups postoperatively, with no significant difference between them.
- The mean cost was lower in the PKP group at $5109 compared to $6699 for the PMCP group.
- Postoperative vertebral body height restoration was greater in the PMCP group, with anterior, middle, and posterior height ratios of 88.44%, 86.15%, and 93.91%, respectively.
- The Cobb angle, a measure of spinal curvature, was lower in the PMCP group at 6.67° compared to 8.99° in the PKP group postoperatively.
- Cement distribution was higher in the PMCP group at 30.48%, indicating more effective cement placement compared to 27.18% in the PKP group.
- Cement leakage occurred less frequently in the PMCP group, with 2 cases compared to 10 in the PKP group.
AI simplified