What this is
- This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of pyronaridine-artesunate for treating uncomplicated Plasmodium vivax malaria in Northwest Ethiopia.
- Fifty-one adult patients were treated and monitored over a 42-day period, with a focus on clinical and parasitological outcomes.
- The findings suggest that this treatment regimen may be a viable alternative to current therapies in the region.
Essence
- Pyronaridine-artesunate demonstrated high efficacy and safety for treating uncomplicated P. vivax malaria, with a 95.9% .
Key takeaways
- Pyronaridine-artesunate achieved a 95.9% rate by day 42, indicating strong efficacy against P. vivax.
- All patients cleared parasitaemia by day 1 and fever by day 2, showcasing the rapid action of the treatment.
- No serious adverse events were reported, suggesting that pyronaridine-artesunate is well-tolerated among patients.
Caveats
- The study had a small sample size of 51 patients, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
- Recurrent parasitaemia in two patients raises questions about the potential for treatment failures or reinfections.
- The absence of plasma concentration measurements for pyronaridine-artesunate limits understanding of drug exposure and resistance.
Definitions
- Adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR): Defined as the absence of parasites without previous treatment failure, measured at a specified follow-up.
AI simplified
Background
Despite malaria morbidity and mortality having reduced substantially in Ethiopia over the last decade, malaria remains a major public health problem [1]. Approximately 70% of the landmass has malaria with 52 percent of the population at risk of infection [2]. Transmission is highly seasonal and varied across the country. Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax are co-endemic in Ethiopia, with proportions of 60% and 40%, respectively [3]. These proportions vary between places and seasons. The estimated prevalence rate of P. vivax is 7.9% by systematic reviews with a wide distribution in the central west region extending to the Northwest and Southwest regions of Ethiopia [4].
According to the current national malaria diagnosis and treatment guidelines for Ethiopia updated in 2020, the first-line drug for treatment for uncomplicated P. vivax malaria is chloroquine (CQ) complemented by primaquine (PQ) (0.25 mg/kg/day) for 14 days for radical cure [5]. Artemether-lumefantrine (AL) is the first-line drug for treatment for uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria, followed by single-dose PQ (0.75 mg/kg) for gametocyte clearance, and the recommended regimen for mixed infection of P. falciparum and P. vivax is AL co-administered with PQ for 14 days. Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine is recommended as second-line treatment for both P. falciparum and P. vivax malaria.
The first report of chloroquine resistance in P. vivax was in 1989 from Papua New Guinea [6]. Evidence of resistance has continued to spread across multiple regions [7] and has reached a concerning prevalence in some locations, requiring changes to first line treatment [8–10]. However, CQ resistant P. vivax has been less prevalent in Africa with the first report in Ethiopia in 1996 [11]. Recent studies have reported declining efficacy of CQ for the treatment of P. vivax from different endemic areas of Ethiopia, with the risk of recurrence at day 28 ranging from 7.5% to 22% [12–14]. The rising occurrence of treatment failures highlights the importance of investigating alternative anti-malarial options, such as the oral artemisinin-based combination pyronaridine–artesunate [15].
Several studies have investigated the safety and efficacy of pyronaridine-artesunate treatment for P. vivax in Africa and Asia [16–20]. However, there are no published data available from Ethiopia. This is the first efficacy study of pyronaridine-artesunate study reported for the treatment of uncomplicated P. vivax malaria in Ethiopia.
Methods
Study area and period
Map of study site in Northwest Ethiopia (Green colour shows study area)
Study design
This study was a single arm prospective therapeutic efficacy study based on standard World Health Organization (WHO) therapeutic efficacy protocols [22], to evaluate the clinical and parasitological responses of uncomplicated P. vivax malaria to pyronaridine-artesunate. Patients who met the study inclusion criteria provided informed consent, were enrolled and were then treated at the health centre with pyronaridine-artesunate and monitored for 42 days.
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18 years, monoinfection with P. vivax detected by microscopy, parasitaemia ≥ 250 asexual parasites per microlitre of blood, axillary temperature ≥ 37.5 °C or history of fever in the past 24 h and permanently living within the health centre catchment area (5–10 km radius) during the study period.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria were: mixed infection (both P. falciparum and P. vivax), evidence of severe malaria, clinical signs and symptoms of hepatic injury (nausea and abdominal pain associated with jaundice), and known severe liver disease (cirrhosis), known allergy to the study medication, evidence of a non-malaria febrile illness (otitis media, tonsillitis, measles, measles, acute lower respiratory tract infection, severe diarrhoea with dehydration), took an investigation anti-malarial drug within 28 days, haemoglobin concentration < 8.0 g/dL, known pregnancy and breastfeeding.
Sample size determination
The required sample size was determined according to the WHO protocol [22]; the sample size calculation assumed a 95% cure rate of pyronaridine-artesunate on day 42. With the desired precision of 5% and a 95% confidence interval (CI), an initial sample size of 73 was calculated. Assuming an additional 20% for loss to follow-up and withdrawal, at least 88 patients were planned to be recruited.
Treatment and follow-up
Patients with P. vivax malaria, who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were treated with a 3-day course of daily pyronaridine-artesunate (Pyramax®; Shin Poong Pharmaceuticals Co, Republic of Korea) provided as a tablet (180 mg pyronaridine and 60 mg artesunate). Patients were dosed according to body weight: 20 to < 24 kg, one tablet; 24 to < 45 kg, two tablets; 45 to < 65 kg, three tablets; ≥ 65 kg, four tablets per day. Treatments were given under direct supervision and patients were observed for one hour after each dose to monitor for vomiting or other side effects. Vomiting within 30 min after administration, led to re-administration of the full dose and vomiting between 30 min and one hour led to re-administration of a half dose. Patients who vomited a second time were withdrawn from the study and received parenteral artesunate therapy administered according to national guidelines [5].
Patients were followed-up daily for the first 3 days after the first dose (day 0) and then weekly on days 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42. Patients were also assessed on any unscheduled visit if symptoms occurred. Adverse events and severe adverse events were defined according to the WHO protocol for monitoring the therapeutic efficacy of anti-malarial drugs [22]. PQ treatment was initiated for patients at the end of their follow-up.
Laboratory procedures
Finger prick thick and thin blood smears were taken from all participants and prepared on two slides for detection of parasites at all follow-up visits. The first slides were prepared by staining with 10% Giemsa for 10–15 min for initial screening. The second slides were stained using 3% Giemsa for 30 min and read by two independent laboratory technicians from the health centre. If results were discordant, a third reading was performed by a senior laboratory technician. Parasite densities were recorded for all positive slides. The number of asexual parasites was counted per 200 white blood cells (WBC) and parasitaemia was estimated assuming WBC counts of 8000/µL. Gametocytes were counted against 500 WBCs. Before any blood smear was interpreted as negative, two hundred oil-immersion high-power fields on the thick film were read [23]. To ensure microscopy quality, all slides were cross-checked by a WHO-accredited microscopist at the Adama Malaria Control and Monitoring Centre. Haemoglobin concentrations were measured using a portable spectrophotometer (HemoCue®, Angelholm, Sweden) on days 0, 14, 28, and 42. Females aged 12 years and older were screened for pregnancy before enrolment.
Treatment outcomes
Efficacy outcomes were based on an assessment of the parasitological and clinical outcomes of anti-malarial treatment according to the WHO guidelines [22]. Patients were classified as having early treatment failure, late clinical failure, late parasitological failure, or ACPR, defined as the absence of parasites without previous treatment failure. The ACPR was determined on day 42 for P. vivax. Safety outcomes were the proportion of any symptom occurring during the study period.
Statistical analysis
Data were double-entered into the WHO Excel spreadsheet designed for therapeutic efficacy data. IBM SPSS (version 24) software was used to generate descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviations, and percentages). Based on WHO guidelines the ACPR on day 42 was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method [22].
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI). Written informed consent was obtained from all of the study participants; signed by adults after understanding in their local language. Participant identities were kept confidential throughout.
Results
Baseline characteristics
Study profile. Screening, Enrollment, and Follow-up of Patients
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Number of patients | 51 |
| Mean age, year (SD) [range] | 29.1 (± 11.1) [18–65] |
| Male sex, n (%) | 35 (68.6%) |
| Mean body temperature,C (SD) [range]o | 38.3 (± 1.01) [37.3–41.4] |
| Mean bodyweight, kg (SD) [range] | 52.4 (± 5.56) [45–67] |
| Mean hemoglobin levels, g/dL (SD) [range] | 13.1 (± 1.91) [8.6–16.7] |
| Geometric mean asexual parasitaemia, per µL [range] | 3891 [256–56,889] |
| Presence of gametocytes, n (%) | 16 (31.4%) |
| Previous malaria attack, n (%) | |
| Yes | 39 (76.5%) |
| No | 12 (23.5%) |
Efficacy
Primary outcome
| Treatment outcome | Value |
|---|---|
| Early treatment failure, n (%) | 0 (0) |
| Late clinical failure (N = 49), n (%) | 2 (4) |
| Late parasitological failure, n (%) | 0 (0) |
| Adequate clinical and parasitological response (N = 49), n (cumulative risk %; 95% CI)a | 47 (95.9; 84.9–99.0) |
| Lost/withdrawn, n (%) | 2 (3.9) |
| Total per protocol, n (%) | 49 (96.1) |
Secondary outcomes
Fever clearance rate during efficacy study of pyronaridine–artesunate for the treatment of P. vivax in North West Ethiopia, 2021
Presence of adverse events
| Symptom | Frequency | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0n (%) | Day 1n (%) | Day 2n (%) | Day 3n (%) | Day 7n (%) | |
| Headache | 16 (31.4) | 8 (15.7) | 4 (7.8) | 2 (4.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Cough | 3 (5.9) | 3 (5.9) | 2 (3.9) | 2 (4.0) | 1 (2.0) |
| Abdominal pain | 7 (13.7) | 3 (5.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Anorexia | 2 (3.9) | 2 (3.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Vomiting | 2 (3.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Nausea | 1 (2.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Diarrhoea | 1 (2.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Total patients assessed | 51 | 51 | 51 | 50 | 50 |
Discussion
This study found pyronaridine-artesunate to be highly efficacious for the treatment of uncomplicated P. vivax malaria in Northwest Ethiopia. All patients treated with pyronaridine-artesunate were parasite-free within 24 h, with 2 (4%) of the 49 patients who completed 42 days follow-up having a P. vivax recurrence.
Recurrent parasitaemia can be caused by recrudescences from the same isolate, reinfection from a new infection, or relapses from hypnozoites in the liver [24]. Similar to most P. vivax therapeutic efficacy studies, this study was undertaken in a malaria-endemic setting, with patients at risk of new infections during the follow up period. This risk is related to the duration of follow up, host immunity, and level of transmission [25].
In general, P. vivax malaria is more difficult to control and eliminate than P. falciparum because it can relapse from dormant liver stages after clearance of the initial infection. Effective cure of vivax malaria requires treatment of both its schizontocidal and hypnozoiticidal stages. Pyronaridine-artesunate has schizonticidal efficacy but lacks activity against the P. vivax liver stage hypnozoites. To effectively prevent relapses and minimize the risk of local transmission, pyronaridine-artesunate needs to be administered with a hypnozoiticidal agent, such as primaquine.
The present study had two late clinical failures recorded after pyronaridine-artesunate treatment at day 35 and day 42. Genotyping of polymorphic loci is undertaken routinely in P. falciparum drug efficacy studies to distinguish new infections from true parasite recrudescences [26]. However, for P. vivax, molecular typing recurrences cannot reliably differentiate between recrudescences, relapses or re-infections. This is because patients can harbour different populations of hypnozoites derived from repeated inoculations [27]. The difficulties in using genomic testing to differentiate recrudescences, relapses and new infections make it difficult to definitively identify the cause of the recurrences in the two patients in this study, however, their presentation on days 35 and 42 makes recrudescence less likely.
The speed of parasite clearance after anti-malarial treatment can be used to assess the therapeutic response to an anti-malarial drug [28]. Presence of parasitaemia on day 3 after treatment commencement is a key indicator of the possible emergence of artemisinin resistance [29]. In this study, all patients cleared their parasitaemia by day 1 after pyronaridine-artesunate suggesting parasites were highly sensitive to this agent. Furthermore, gametocytaemia was also cleared in all patients by day 1, suggesting pyronaridine-artesunate would be effective in preventing transmission to mosquitoes, thus enhancing control and elimination efforts.
Pyronaridine–artesunate have been associated with asymptomatic mild-to-moderate transient rises in liver transaminases in some malaria patients [30, 31]. Although hepatic enzyme levels were not examined in the present study, a recent study showed no increase in the risk of hepatic transaminase elevation with repeated pyronaridine-artesunate treatment and no manifestations of clinical liver disease [32, 33]. Similar to other recent studies, the patients in the present study did not demonstrate any clinical evidence of hepatic injury after treatment with pyronaridine–artesunate [20, 34].
There were some limitations to the current study. The first limitation was that pyronaridine-artesunate plasma concentrations were not measured, so the possibility that the recurrent parasitaemias might have resulted from insufficient drug exposure or parasite resistance cannot be determined. In addition, despite the study being conducted soon after peak transmission season, the planned number of patients could not be enrolled. This was further complicated by a low overall number of P. vivax malaria cases in the study area, which reduces the precision of the final results. Study participants were 18 years and older as the Ethiopia Food and Drug Authority didn’t allow the study to be conducted children younger than 18 years of age. There is the potential for variable efficacy with pyronaridine-artesunate in children which limits the generalizability of the study’s findings across all age groups.
Conclusion
In summary, this is the first study to report the efficacy of pyronaridine-artesunate for uncomplicated P. vivax in Ethiopia. Despite a low number of cases, this study suggests that pyronaridine-artesunate is likely efficacious for the treatment of P. vivax-infected adults in Northwest Ethiopia, with a high parasite clearance rate and rapid clinical response. Following further studies, pyronaridine-artesunate may be considered as a potential anti-malarial as part of the national malaria control and elimination programme.