Trials

Using a lab-made protein to prevent severe COVID-19 in hospitalized patients: Summary of a pilot trial plan

Updated

Abstract

Approximately 120 individuals are being randomized in a phase 2a clinical trial to evaluate the effects of conestat alfa on COVID-19 severity.

  • Conestat alfa is a recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor that targets multiple inflammatory pathways.
  • The primary outcome measures disease severity on day 7 after enrollment using an adapted WHO Ordinal Scale.
  • Secondary outcomes include the time to clinical improvement and the rate of participants avoiding invasive or non-invasive ventilation by day 14.
  • Participants must have confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and show pulmonary involvement, along with specific risk factors for disease progression.
  • The trial aims to assess both efficacy and safety of conestat alfa in addition to standard of care for hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Simplified

Key numbers

120
Sample Size
Approximately 80 in the active treatment arm, 40 in the SOC group.

Full Text

What this is

  • This protocol outlines a pilot trial investigating conestat alfa for severe COVID-19.
  • Conestat alfa is a recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor targeting inflammatory processes.
  • The trial will assess efficacy and safety in hospitalized patients with pulmonary involvement.
  • Participants will be randomized to receive conestat alfa or standard of care.

Essence

  • The trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of conestat alfa in reducing disease severity in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. It will compare outcomes between those receiving conestat alfa alongside standard care and those receiving standard care alone.

Simplified

Funding

Competing interests

MT reports receiving grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, and having research collaborations with Roche, Novartis, and Idorsia outside the submitted work. WCA reports receiving fees and research grants from A. Vogel AG and fees for attendance of advisory boards to MSD and Vifor Pharma that were paid to his institution outside the submitted work. MO reports receiving consulting fees from Pharming Biotechnologies B.V. during the conduct of the study and grants from Pharming Biotechnologies B.V. outside the submitted work. LH reports receiving consulting fees from GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis during the conduct of the study but unrelated to this trial. All other authors have declared no competing interests.
PubMed

What Lands in Your Inbox Each Week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free