Risk of revision for infection in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with osteoarthritis: A prospective, population‐based study on 108,786 hip and knee joint arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

Apr 15, 2010Arthritis care & research

Risk of infection-related surgery after first hip and knee replacements in rheumatoid arthritis versus osteoarthritis patients

AI simplified

GLP-1 Therapies on OpenScience ↗PubMed ↗DOI ↗

Abstract

RA patients with total knee replacement (TKR) had a 1.6 times higher risk of revision for infection compared to OA patients.

No significant difference in revision risk for infection was observed between RA and OA patients after total hip replacement (THR).
From 2001 onward, the risk of revision for infection increased for THRs but decreased for TKRs.
The increased risk of revision for infection in RA patients persisted from 6 years post-surgery onward.
Overall, the risk for late infection leading to revision was higher in RA patients than in OA patients.

AI simplified

OBJECTIVE: To compare differences in the risk of revision for infection and changes in risk over time and in time from primary surgery to revision for infection after total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA) patients.

METHODS: In the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 6,629 and 102,157 primary total joint replacements in patients with RA and OA, respectively, were identified from 1987 (1994 for knees) until 2008. Survival analyses with revision due to infection as the end point were performed using Kaplan-Meier methods for constructing survival curves and multiple Cox regression to calculate relative risk (RR) estimates for diagnosis, age, sex, and year of primary surgery. An extended Cox model was used to estimate RR within different followup intervals.

RESULTS: RA patients with TKR had a 1.6 times higher risk of revision for infection than OA patients, whereas there was no difference in the THRs. In the THRs, we found a higher risk of revision for infection from 2001 onward, whereas the development for TKRs was the opposite. These time effects affected the RA and OA groups equally. The risk of revision for infection from 6 years postoperatively on was higher in RA patients.

CONCLUSION: The overall risk of revision for infection after TKR was higher in RA patients. The risk of late infection leading to revision of the TKR and THR was higher in RA patients than in OA patients. After the year 2000, the RR of revision for infection in RA compared with OA remained unchanged.

Full Text

Full text is available at the source.

View full text ↗

Risk of revision for infection in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with osteoarthritis: A prospective, population‐based study on 108,786 hip and knee joint arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

Abstract

Full Text

You found one interesting study. We’ll send the next 7.

what lands in your inbox each week:

Recent issues from the glp-1 therapies brief

Abstract

Full Text

Related papers

You found one interesting study. We’ll send the next 7.

what lands in your inbox each week:

Recent issues from the glp-1 therapies brief