The ability to self‐monitor cognitive performance during 60 h total sleep deprivation and following 2 nights recovery sleep

Nov 22, 2017Journal of sleep research

How well people notice their thinking skills during 60 hours without sleep and after two nights of recovery sleep

AI simplified

Circadian Biology on OpenScience ↗PubMed ↗DOI ↗

Abstract

Forty adults experienced performance decline during 60 hours of total sleep deprivation.

Performance on arithmetic tasks and sustained attention decreased during sleep deprivation and improved after recovery.
Participants accurately self-monitored performance on the Psychomotor Vigilance Task during sleep deprivation but overestimated deficits on the arithmetic task.
An increased task difficulty led to greater overestimation of performance deficits during sleep deprivation.
Subjective sleepiness was linked to subjective performance ratings for the Psychomotor Vigilance Task at multiple time points.
Self-monitoring ability was impaired for working memory during sleep deprivation and for the Psychomotor Vigilance Task following recovery.

AI simplified

We aimed to investigate whether self-monitoring of performance is altered during 60 h of total sleep deprivation, following 2 nights of recovery sleep, and by task difficulty and/or subjective sleepiness. Forty adults (22 females, aged 19-39 years) underwent a 5-day protocol, with a well-rested day, 66 h total sleep deprivation (last test session at 60 h), and 2 nights of 8 h recovery sleep. An arithmetic task (MATH) with three difficulty levels assessed working memory. The Psychomotor Vigilance Task assessed sustained attention. Arithmetic accuracy and Psychomotor Vigilance Task median reaction time measured objective performance. Subjective performance was measured with self-reported accuracy and speed. Objective-subjective differences assessed self-monitoring ability. The performance on both tasks declined during total sleep deprivation and improved following recovery. During total sleep deprivation, participants accurately self-monitored performance on the Psychomotor Vigilance Task; however, they overestimated cognitive deficits on MATH, self-reporting performance as worse than actually observed. Following recovery, participants overestimated the extent of performance improvement on the Psychomotor Vigilance Task. Task difficulty influenced self-monitoring ability, with greater overestimation of performance deficits during total sleep deprivation as difficulty increased. Subjective sleepiness predicted subjective performance ratings at several time points, only for the Psychomotor Vigilance Task. The ability to self-monitor performance was impaired during total sleep deprivation for working memory and after recovery sleep for the Psychomotor Vigilance Task, but was otherwise accurate. The development of self-monitoring strategies, assessing both subjective perceptions of performance and subjective sleepiness, within operational contexts may help reduce the consequences of sleep-related impairments.

Full Text

Full text is available at the source.

View full text (PDF) ↗View full text (XML) ↗View full text ↗

The ability to self‐monitor cognitive performance during 60 h total sleep deprivation and following 2 nights recovery sleep

Abstract

Full Text

You found one interesting study. We’ll send the next 7.

what lands in your inbox each week:

Recent issues from the circadian biology brief

Abstract

Full Text

Related papers

You found one interesting study. We’ll send the next 7.

what lands in your inbox each week:

Recent issues from the circadian biology brief