eLife

Removing the sulfate transporter SUL1 lengthens yeast lifespan by lowering PKA signaling, not by reducing sulfate intake

Updated

Abstract

Essence

Deleting the yeast sulfate transporter SUL1 extended replicative lifespan by lowering rather than by reducing sulfate uptake.

Evidence

This Saccharomyces cerevisiae mechanistic study linked SUL1 deletion to reduced PKA signaling, higher trehalose and glycogen, more MSN2 nuclear localization, enhanced , and showed lifespan extension depended on MSN2 and autophagy pathways.

Caveat

The finding comes from a yeast genetic model, so its lifespan mechanism may not generalize beyond this organism or nutrient-signaling context.

Simplified

Key figures

Figure 1.
SUL1 deletion extends yeast lifespan without altering sulfate transport or metabolism
Highlights that lifespan extension by SUL1 deletion occurs without reduced sulfate uptake or metabolism changes
elife-94609-fig1
  • Panel A
    Survival curves show SUL1Δ mutant yeast live longer than wild-type (), with average lifespans of 31.6 vs 25.6 cell divisions
  • Panels B a-c
    Survival curves for mutants affecting sulfate transport/metabolism (, MET3Δ, SUL2Δ) show no significant lifespan change compared to WT
  • Panel C
    Time course of normalized intracellular sulfate concentration shows similar sulfate uptake over 0, 2, 5, and 10 minutes in WT, SUL1Δ, SUL2Δ, and SUL1E427Q strains
Figure 2.
Gene expression changes and related biological processes in SUL1 deletion mutant versus wild type yeast
Highlights increased stress response and reduced biosynthetic gene expression in SUL1 deletion yeast compared to wild type.
elife-94609-fig2
  • Panel A
    Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes () between SUL1Δ and strains showing genes upregulated (red) and downregulated (blue) with statistical significance (p-values) and fold changes ().
  • Panel B
    Bar graph of enrichment scores for biological processes associated with upregulated (red) and downregulated (blue) DEGs, highlighting processes like oxidative stress response and amino acid biosynthesis.
  • Panels C
    of gene expression changes in stress response genes (left) and amino acid biosynthetic plus genes (right), with SUL1Δ samples showing visibly higher expression in stress response genes and lower expression in biosynthetic genes compared to WT.
  • Panel D
    Network diagram linking potential (blue hexagons) to DEGs (green circles) in enriched biological processes such as amino acid biosynthesis, protein catabolism, and stress responses.
Figure 3.
inhibition and nuclear translocation in vs SUL1Δ yeast strains
Highlights increased MSN2 nuclear localization and stress gene expression in SUL1 deletion yeast versus wild type
elife-94609-fig3
  • Panel A
    mRNA levels of stress response and synthesis genes in WT and SUL1Δ strains, with several genes significantly increased in SUL1Δ (*p<0.05), one gene not significant (ns)
  • Panel B
    Concentrations of trehalose and in WT and SUL1Δ strains, both higher in SUL1Δ (p<0.05; *p<0.01)
  • Panel C
    Representative images of MSN2- localization in WT and SUL1Δ strains; SUL1Δ cells appear to have brighter nuclear EGFP signal
  • Panel D
    Quantification of MSN2-EGFP nuclear to total cell fluorescence ratio, significantly higher in SUL1Δ (***p<0.001)
  • Panel E
    Time-lapse images of MSN2-EGFP in WT and SUL1Δ strains over 0 to 32 hours, showing nuclear localization dynamics
  • Panel F
    Normalized nuclear/cytoplasmic MSN2-EGFP fluorescence ratio over cell generations in WT and SUL1Δ strains, with dashed lines marking before and after 17th generation
  • Panel G
    Comparison of nuclear/cytoplasmic MSN2-EGFP mean fluorescence ratio by age in WT and SUL1Δ strains, with SUL1Δ showing significantly higher ratios at multiple generations (p<0.05 to ***p<0.0001), some generations not significant (ns)
Figure 4.
Wild-type vs SUL1Δ yeast: gene expression and fluorescence over time and conditions
Highlights increased autophagy marker intensity in SUL1Δ yeast, especially under glucose restriction conditions
elife-94609-fig4
  • Panel A
    of autophagy-related gene expression changes comparing and SUL1Δ strains
  • Panel B
    Time-lapse images of ATG8-EGFP in WT and SUL1Δ cells showing fluorescence patterns over 0 to 32 hours; SUL1Δ cells appear to have more visible ATG8-EGFP signal
  • Panel C
    Normalized ATG8-EGFP across cell generations for WT and SUL1Δ strains, with individual cell traces
  • Panel D
    Distribution of ATG8-EGFP fluorescence intensity by cell age in WT and SUL1Δ strains; SUL1Δ shows significantly higher intensity at later generations
  • Panel E
    Time-lapse images of ATG8-EGFP in WT and SUL1Δ strains grown in 2% glucose or 0.05% glucose media at indicated times; SUL1Δ cells appear to have brighter fluorescence under both conditions
  • Panel F
    Distribution of ATG8-EGFP fluorescence intensity over time in WT and SUL1Δ strains under 2% and 0.05% glucose; SUL1Δ shows significantly higher intensity especially under glucose restriction
Figure 5.
Lifespan effects of and deletions in and SUL1Δ yeast strains
Highlights how reduced activity and increased stress responses in SUL1Δ yeast link to longer lifespan.
elife-94609-fig5
  • Panel A
    curves for WT, MSN2Δ, SUL1Δ, and SUL1Δ-MSN2Δ strains with median lifespan values and cell counts; SUL1Δ shows increased lifespan compared to WT, while MSN2Δ and SUL1Δ-MSN2Δ have reduced lifespan.
  • Panel B
    Replicative lifespan curves for WT, ATG8Δ, SUL1Δ, and SUL1Δ-ATG8Δ strains with median lifespan values and cell counts; SUL1Δ shows increased lifespan compared to WT, while ATG8Δ and SUL1Δ-ATG8Δ have reduced lifespan.
  • Panel C
    Schematic model showing SUL1 deletion reduces PKA activity, increasing MSN2 nuclear translocation, , / levels, and decreasing , collectively contributing to lifespan extension.
1 / 5

Full Text

What this is

  • SUL1 deletion in yeast extends replicative lifespan (RLS) without reducing sulfate transport.
  • The lifespan extension results from decreased rather than changes in sulfate metabolism.
  • Key mechanisms include increased stress response and , mediated by the transcription factor MSN2.

Essence

  • Deletion of the sulfate transporter SUL1 extends yeast lifespan by reducing , not by altering sulfate uptake. This leads to enhanced stress protection and .

Key takeaways

  • SUL1 deletion significantly extends yeast RLS, demonstrating a lifespan increase independent of sulfate transport mechanisms.
  • The mechanism involves decreased PKA activity, which promotes stress response and , critical for longevity.
  • MSN2 and are essential for the lifespan extension observed in SUL1 deletion mutants, indicating their roles in stress resistance.

Caveats

  • The study focuses on a single model organism, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other species.
  • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the complex interactions between sulfur signaling and other nutrient pathways.

Definitions

  • PKA signaling: A pathway that regulates various cellular processes, including growth and stress response, influenced by nutrient availability.
  • autophagy: A cellular process that degrades and recycles cellular components, crucial for maintaining cellular homeostasis and promoting longevity.

Simplified

Funding

Competing interests

No competing interests reported.
PubMed

What Lands in Your Inbox Each Week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • ✅direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free