Journal of translational medicine

Time of Day When Heart Attack Symptoms Start Is Not Linked to Heart Damage Size or Long-Term Outcome in Patients with Severe Heart Attacks

Updated

Abstract

Infarct sizes were similar across different time-of-day intervals, with a median size of 10.0 for most groups.

  • Patients presenting with STEMI showed median infarct sizes of 10.0 for four different time intervals (0-6 h, 6-12 h, 12-18 h, 18-24 h).
  • Five-year all-cause mortality rates varied slightly across time intervals, ranging from 8.7% to 13.7%, but did not show significant differences.
  • Time-of-day at symptom onset was not associated with infarct size, mortality, or recovery of heart function after six months.

Simplified

Key figures

Fig. 1
Time-of-day at symptom onset vs measures of myocardial damage in patients
Frames a clear contrast showing no significant differences in myocardial damage measures by time of symptom onset
12967_2019_1934_Fig1_HTML
  • Panels a
    (% of left ventricle) plotted by time of symptom onset with distribution (left) and median with 25th–75th percentiles (right)
  • Panels b
    (% of left ventricle) at 7 to 14 days after STEMI shown by time of symptom onset with distribution (left) and median with 25th–75th percentiles (right)
  • Panels c
    (proportion of initial area at risk saved by reperfusion) shown by time of symptom onset with distribution (left) and median with 25th–75th percentiles (right)
  • Panels d
    Peak (CKMB) levels shown by time of symptom onset with distribution (left) and median with 25th–75th percentiles (right)
Fig. 2
(LV-EF) at 6 months and its improvement from baseline by time-of-day at symptom onset
Highlights consistent recovery of heart function after regardless of symptom onset time
12967_2019_1934_Fig2_HTML
  • Panel a
    LV-EF at 6 months shown as median with 25th–75th percentiles for four time intervals (0–6 h, 6–12 h, 12–18 h, 18–24 h); no significant difference in LV-EF between time groups (p=0.59)
  • Panel b
    LV-EF at baseline and 6 months for each time interval; LV-EF visibly increases from baseline to 6 months across all groups with statistically significant improvement (p<0.0001)
Fig. 3
Survival rates over 5 years by time-of-day at symptom onset in patients
Frames a clear contrast in survival rates showing no significant difference by time-of-day at symptom onset in STEMI patients.
12967_2019_1934_Fig3_HTML
  • Panel a
    Kaplan–Meier curves showing overall survival free from for four time-of-day groups (0-6h, 6-12h, 12-18h, 18-24h); survival curves appear visually similar across groups with no clear differences.
  • Panel b
    Kaplan–Meier curves showing survival free from for the same four time-of-day groups; curves also appear visually similar with no obvious separation.
1 / 3

Full Text

What this is

  • This research investigates the impact of the time-of-day at symptom onset on infarct size and long-term prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
  • A total of 1206 STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) were analyzed.
  • The study found no significant associations between the time-of-day at symptom onset and outcomes such as infarct size or 5-year mortality.

Essence

  • Time-of-day at symptom onset in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI did not influence infarct size or long-term mortality. No significant differences were observed across various time intervals.

Key takeaways

  • Infarct sizes were similar across four time intervals: 0–6 h, 6–12 h, 12–18 h, and 18–24 h, with median values of 10.0 [3.0-24.7], 10.0 [3.0-24.0], 10.0 [3.0-22.0], and 9.0 [3.0-21.0] of the left ventricle, respectively. Statistical analysis showed no significant differences (p = 0.87).
  • Five-year all-cause mortality rates were also similar across time intervals: 13.6%, 8.7%, 13.7%, and 9.3%, with no significant differences (log-rank test p = 0.30).
  • The study concluded that time-of-day at symptom onset did not affect the recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction at 6 months after STEMI.

Caveats

  • The study was retrospective and relied on patient-reported symptom onset times, which may not accurately reflect true onset. This could introduce measurement bias.
  • Follow-up data on left ventricular ejection fraction and mortality were available for only a portion of patients, limiting the generalizability of long-term outcomes.
  • The cohort consisted of patients treated between 2002 and 2007, potentially affecting the relevance of findings in the context of current treatment standards.

Simplified

Funding

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
PubMed

What Lands in Your Inbox Each Week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free