Frontiers in immunology

How activating immune sensors affects gene delivery in dog immune cells: a model for cancer research

Updated

Abstract

Essence

Canine from healthy and tumor-bearing dogs could be matured and efficiently loaded with mRNA, supporting personalized DC vaccine development.

Evidence

This comparative ex vivo cell-study generated canine monocyte-derived dendritic cells from healthy donors and tumor-bearing dogs, showing TLR-responsive maturation and DE-DOPE/mRNA transfection with 100% GFP-positive cells at >60% viability.

Caveat

The evidence is limited to phenotypic and functional cell readouts in an ex vivo canine platform, not clinical vaccine efficacy in patients.

Simplified

Key numbers

74%
Differentiation Efficiency
Percentage of cultured cells that became mature .
100%
GFP-Positive Cells
Percentage of expressing green fluorescent protein after transfection.
>60%
Cell Viability Post-Transfection
Percentage of viable after mRNA transfection.

Key figures

Figure 1
Monocyte and dendritic cell marker expression in healthy dogs versus tumor-bearing dogs at day 0
Highlights marker expression differences in monocytes that set up understanding of immune cell status in tumor-bearing dogs.
fimmu-16-1678896-g001
  • Panel single
    Median expression (%) of markers CD11c, CD1a, CD40, CD80, CD83, CD86, CD90, and in circulating from healthy dogs (HDs) and tumor-bearing dogs (TbDs) at time day 0 (T0); CD11c, CD86, CD90, and DLA class II show high expression in both groups, with DLA class II appearing higher in HDs; CD1a, CD80, and CD83 show very low expression in both groups; CD40 expression appears higher in TbDs than HDs.
Figure 2
Mature dendritic cell marker expression in healthy donors vs tumour bearing dogs after 6 days
Highlights increased expression of key maturation markers CD1a, CD80, and CD83 in both healthy and tumour-bearing dog after differentiation.
fimmu-16-1678896-g002
  • Panel A
    Fold changes in (MFI) of , and in mature dendritic cells from healthy donors at baseline (T0) and day 6 (T6); CD1a, CD80, and CD83 show significant upregulation at T6 compared to T0.
  • Panel B
    Fold changes in MFI of the same markers in mature dendritic cells from tumour bearing dogs at T0 and T6; CD1a, CD80, and CD83 also show significant upregulation at T6 compared to T0.
Figure 3
Cytokine production levels in canine after stimulation with and
Highlights stronger and responses after LPS and R848 stimulation, marking functional immune activation
fimmu-16-1678896-g003
  • Panel A
    concentration measured after 48 and 72 hours of stimulation with LPS, Poly I:C, and R848, showing no significant changes compared to control
  • Panel B
    IL-8 concentration after 48 and 72 hours of stimulation, with LPS and R848 showing a significant increase compared to control
  • Panel C
    IL-12p70 concentration after 48 and 72 hours of stimulation, with both LPS and R848 causing a significant increase at both timepoints
  • Panel D
    concentration after 48 and 72 hours of stimulation, showing no significant changes across all conditions
Figure 4
Canine mature transfected with different doses of after 5 hours
Highlights the presence and distribution of transfected with visible green fluorescence after different lipoplex doses
fimmu-16-1678896-g004
  • Panels A and B
    Images of cmDCs transfected with 1X DE-DOPE lipoplexes showing green fluorescence-positive cells and blue-stained nuclei
  • Panels C and D
    Images of cmDCs transfected with 2X DE-DOPE lipoplexes showing green fluorescence-positive cells and blue-stained nuclei
Figure 5
delivery and localization in canine mature using
Highlights intracellular localization of mRNA delivered by DE-DOPE lipoplexes, supporting efficient gene delivery in canine dendritic cells
fimmu-16-1678896-g005
  • Panels A and B
    Fluorescence microscopy images of transfected with Cy5-labeled mRNA delivered by 1X and 2X DE-DOPE lipoplexes, showing magenta Cy5-mRNA signal (arrows), blue nuclei, and green cell membranes at 63× magnification
  • Panel C
    Magnified view highlighting Cy5-mRNA localization within cmDCs, with visible magenta Cy5-mRNA clusters inside cells stained for nuclei (blue) and membranes (green)
1 / 5

Full Text

What this is

  • Canine mature (cmDCs) can be generated from both healthy dogs and tumor-bearing dogs.
  • This study evaluates the efficiency of cmDC generation and their response to Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists.
  • It also explores the potential for genetic modification of cmDCs using mRNA delivery systems.

Essence

  • cmDCs derived from healthy and tumor-bearing dogs show comparable generation efficiency and functional responses to TLR agonists. The study demonstrates effective mRNA delivery into cmDCs, supporting their use in personalized cancer immunotherapy.

Key takeaways

  • cmDCs generated from both healthy donors and tumor-bearing dogs exhibited similar differentiation efficiency, around 74%. This suggests that tumor presence does not significantly hinder the generation of functional .
  • Stimulation with TLR agonists, LPS and R848, significantly increased the expression of CD80 and CD83 on cmDCs. This indicates that TLR engagement enhances the immunostimulatory capacity of these cells.
  • Transfection of cmDCs with mRNA-loaded lipoplexes achieved 100% GFP-positive cells with >60% viability. This demonstrates the potential of non-viral mRNA delivery systems for genetic modification of .

Caveats

  • The study's findings are limited by the small sample size of tumor-bearing dogs, which may affect the generalizability of the results.
  • Functional assays to demonstrate effective T-cell activation were not conducted, leaving a gap in confirming the practical application of cmDCs in immunotherapy.

Definitions

  • Dendritic cells (DCs): Professional antigen-presenting cells that activate T lymphocytes and initiate immune responses.
  • Toll-like receptors (TLRs): Receptors that recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns and activate immune responses.

Simplified

Funding

Competing interests

Authors SGP, CV and NL were employed by the company PoliRNA Srl. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
PubMed

What Lands in Your Inbox Each Week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free