Triple artemisinin-based combination therapies versus artemisinin-based combination therapies for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a multicentre, open-label, randomised clinical trial

Mar 15, 2020Lancet (London, England)

Comparing three-drug versus two-drug artemisinin treatments for uncomplicated malaria in a multi-site clinical trial

AI simplified

Abstract

98% efficacy was observed for dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus mefloquine in Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam after 42 days.

  • Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine had a 48% efficacy rate, indicating a significant difference compared to the combination with mefloquine.
  • In Myanmar, the efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus mefloquine was 91%, while dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone reached 100%.
  • The combination of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus mefloquine was found to be non-inferior to artesunate-mefloquine in Cambodia.
  • The overall efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine plus amodiaquine was 98%, comparable to 97% for artemether-lumefantrine alone.
  • Early vomiting occurred more frequently after dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus mefloquine than dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone.
  • Adding amodiaquine to artemether-lumefantrine was associated with a significant increase in the corrected QT interval.

AI simplified

Full Text

We can’t show the full text here under this license. Use the link below to read it at the source.

what lands in your inbox each week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free