Performance of a wearable CORE sensor for nocturnal core temperature monitoring during sleep

May 5, 2026Journal of thermal biology

Accuracy of a wearable sensor for measuring core body temperature during sleep

AI simplified

Circadian Biology on OpenScience ↗PubMed ↗DOI ↗

Abstract

49.49% of male and 65.67% of female observations fell outside limits of agreement when assessing core body temperature with a wearable sensor.

Classical pointwise Bland-Altman analysis indicated acceptable agreement (>95% of observations within limits of agreement) for core body temperature measurements.
A modified Bland-Altman analysis revealed substantial disagreement in temperature measurements during nocturnal sleep.
Females demonstrated a significantly earlier circadian phase and greater amplitude compared to males.
The wearable sensor exhibited good test-retest reliability with an ICC of 0.810.
The findings suggest that classical analysis methods may overestimate agreement for continuous nocturnal temperature data.

AI simplified

Wearable sensors are increasingly used to estimate core body temperature (CBT) during sleep, and their validity is commonly assessed using classical Bland-Altman analysis. However, this approach assumes independence between observations and may be inappropriate for continuous, temporally autocorrelated physiological data. Whether reliance on pointwise Bland-Altman analysis leads to inflated agreement estimates during nocturnal sleep has not been systematically examined. We evaluated the validity and reliability of a wearable CORE sensor against rectal thermistor measurements during a controlled 9-h sleep protocol (22:00-07:00) in 26 healthy young adults (16 males & 10 females). Agreement was assessed using a modified Bland-Altman approach based on time-aggregated nocturnal CBT values to account for temporal autocorrelation. Circadian rhythmicity was characterized using cosinor analysis, and test-retest reliability was examined in a subset of 10 males. Classical pointwise Bland-Altman analysis suggested acceptable agreement (>95% of observations within limits of agreement). In contrast, the modified analysis revealed substantial disagreement, with 49.49% of male and 65.67% of female observations falling outside limits of agreement. Females exhibited significantly earlier circadian phase (p = 0.012) and greater amplitude (p = 0.021) compared with males. Test-retest reliability of the wearable sensor was good (ICC = 0.810). These findings demonstrate that classical Bland-Altman analysis overestimates agreement when applied to continuous nocturnal temperature data. Although the wearable sensor showed acceptable reliability and captured circadian trends, it did not accurately measure absolute nocturnal CBT in either sex.

Full Text

Full text is available at the source.

View full text (XML) ↗View full text ↗

Performance of a wearable CORE sensor for nocturnal core temperature monitoring during sleep

Abstract

Full Text

You found one interesting study. We’ll send the next 7.

what lands in your inbox each week:

Recent issues from the circadian biology brief