Aging cell

A freely eaten diet that extends lifespan like calorie restriction but works through opposite energy regulation

Updated

Abstract

Essence

In mice, an ad libitum low-protein, high-carbohydrate high-fibre diet matched for lifespan and metabolic benefits but appeared to work through different biology.

Evidence

This mouse dietary intervention study compared conventional caloric restriction with fasting against a 25%-fibre-diluted low-protein, high-carbohydrate diet and found similar longevity and metabolic health gains, with liver proteomics showing increased energy and mitochondrial pathways under caloric restriction but reduced energy pathways and increased RNA metabolism and spliceosome pathways under the ad libitum diet.

Caveat

The lifespan and mechanism findings come from mice and liver proteomics, so the proposed energy-splicing resilience explanation and human sustainability claims remain inferential.

Simplified

Key numbers

17%
Increase in Median Lifespan ()
Compared to a control diet.
11%
Increase in Median Lifespan ()
Compared to a control diet.
15%
Reduction in Energy Intake ()
Despite increased food consumption.

Key figures

FIGURE 1
Control vs vs diets: lifespan, body weight, and food and energy intake in mice
Highlights longer lifespan and reduced food and energy intake in CR mice compared to Control and LPHC groups
ACEL-24-e70269-g004
  • Panel A
    Experimental timeline showing diet start, measurement timepoints, and procedures including , glucose tolerance test (), and grip strength tests
  • Panel B
    for both sexes combined showing lifespan probability over time for Control, CR, and LPHC diets
  • Panel C
    Survival curves for females showing lifespan probability over time for Control, CR, and LPHC diets
  • Panel D
    Survival curves for males showing lifespan probability over time for Control, CR, and LPHC diets
  • Panel E
    Monthly average food intake (g/mouse/day) from 6 to 15 months for females and males; CR group shows visibly lower intake compared to Control and LPHC groups
  • Panel F
    Monthly average energy intake (kJ/mouse/day) from 6 to 15 months for females and males; CR group shows visibly lower energy intake compared to Control and LPHC groups
FIGURE 3
Control vs vs 20% diets: body composition, blood markers, liver metrics, and liver tissue in male and female mice over time
Highlights distinct effects of LPHC and CR diets on body fat, insulin sensitivity, and liver health over time
ACEL-24-e70269-g002
  • Panel A
    Body weight measured over 1, 6, 12, and 18 months in male and female mice on control, LPHC, or 20% CR diets
  • Panel B
    Fat mass as percent of body weight over time in male and female mice on the three diets
  • Panel C
    Lean mass measured over time in male and female mice on control, LPHC, or 20% CR diets
  • Panel D
    levels before glucose tolerance test () in male and female mice on each diet
  • Panel E
    levels before GTT in male and female mice on control, LPHC, or 20% CR diets
  • Panel F
    calculated from glucose and insulin levels in male and female mice over time on each diet
  • Panel G
    Area under the curve () during oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) in male and female mice on the three diets
  • Panel H
    Liver weight measured over time in male and female mice on control, LPHC, or 20% CR diets
  • Panel I
    Liver triglyceride levels measured over time in male and female mice on the three diets
  • Panel J
    H&E stained liver tissue sections at 18 months on diet (21 months age) for male and female mice on control, LPHC, or 20% CR diets, showing tissue structure and fat accumulation
FIGURE 4
Protein changes in male and female mice fed or 20% diets versus control.
Highlights shared protein changes and pathway shifts in LPHC and CR diets versus control, spotlighting metabolic adaptations.
ACEL-24-e70269-g001
  • Panel A
    plot showing separation of samples by sex, diet (, CR, LPHC), and age (color gradient).
  • Panel B
    Venn diagram showing overlap of proteins differing in Con vs LPHC and Con vs CR comparisons, with 863 common proteins highlighted.
  • Panel C
    of significantly different proteins common to LPHC and CR versus Con, with red indicating upregulation and blue indicating downregulation.
  • Panel D
    analysis showing and pathways for common proteins in CR vs Con and LPHC vs Con comparisons.
  • Panel E
    Boxplots of example common proteins (Ethe1, Cpt2, Aass, Ndufa4, Tmem135) showing expression levels by sex and diet groups.
FIGURE 5
Control vs vs : unique liver protein changes and related biological processes in mice
Highlights distinct protein and biological process changes unique to CR and LPHC diets, spotlighting different molecular responses in longevity models.
ACEL-24-e70269-g003
  • Panel A
    Venn diagram showing overlap and unique proteins differing from control in LPHC and CR diets; LPHC has 1022 unique proteins, CR has 488 unique proteins.
  • Panels B
    (GO-BP) analysis of proteins uniquely or in CR mice versus control, highlighting mitochondrial and -related processes.
  • Panels C
    GO-BP analysis of proteins uniquely upregulated or downregulated in LPHC mice versus control, emphasizing RNA metabolism, splicing, and amino acid metabolic processes.
  • Panels D
    Boxplots of protein levels unique to CR (Vdav2, Sirt3, Mapk1) across female and male mice in control, CR, and LPHC groups.
  • Panels E
    Boxplots of protein levels unique to LPHC (Cpt1, Srsf1, Actn1) across female and male mice in control, CR, and LPHC groups.
1 / 4

Full Text

What this is

  • This research compares the effects of () and an ad libitum-fed low-protein, high-carbohydrate () diet on lifespan and metabolic health in mice.
  • Both dietary approaches enhanced longevity compared to a control diet, but they operated through different biological mechanisms.
  • The findings support the 'energy-splicing resilience' theory of aging, suggesting that dietary strategies can promote longevity without strict .

Essence

  • An ad libitum-fed diet increased median lifespan by 17% and metabolic health in mice, comparable to a conventional diet that reduced food intake by 20%. Both diets enhanced longevity but through opposite effects on energy metabolism and RNA splicing.

Key takeaways

  • The diet increased median lifespan by 17% compared to a control diet, while the diet increased it by 11%. Both diets showed no significant lifespan difference between them.
  • The diet reduced energy intake by 15%, despite a 16%-17% increase in food consumption due to its low energy density, demonstrating that it can promote longevity without enforced fasting.
  • Liver proteomics revealed that upregulated mitochondrial proteins, while the diet increased proteins related to RNA metabolism, supporting the of aging.

Caveats

  • The study's findings are based on mouse models, which may not fully translate to human dietary practices or aging processes.
  • The long-term effects and potential side effects of the diet in humans remain to be investigated, as the study primarily focused on short-term outcomes in mice.

Definitions

  • caloric restriction (CR): A dietary regimen that reduces calorie intake without malnutrition, commonly associated with increased lifespan in various species.
  • low-protein, high-carbohydrate (LPHC) diet: A diet characterized by low protein content and high carbohydrates, designed to promote health and longevity without caloric restriction.
  • energy-splicing resilience axis theory: A hypothesis suggesting that resilience to aging-related stressors requires enhanced RNA splicing processes, which can be influenced by dietary factors.

Simplified

what lands in your inbox each week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free