What this is
- This research investigates the effects of aldosterone on endothelin B receptor (ETB) signaling in the inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD).
- Aldosterone is known to modulate sodium and water reabsorption, potentially impacting blood pressure regulation.
- The study examines whether aldosterone inhibits ETB-mediated signaling processes that could enhance fluid retention.
Essence
- Aldosterone does not inhibit ETB signaling in the IMCD, suggesting it does not affect ETB-mediated natriuresis and diuresis. Despite aldosterone's known effects on sodium retention, the study finds no alteration in key signaling pathways.
Key takeaways
- Aldosterone treatment did not change the effect of the ETB agonist sarafotoxin-6c (S6c) on ERK phosphorylation in IMCD3 cells. This indicates that aldosterone does not modify ETB signaling through Gs protein pathways.
- S6c inhibited AVP-stimulated cAMP accumulation in acutely isolated rat IMCD similarly, regardless of aldosterone exposure. This suggests that aldosterone does not influence the inhibitory effects of ETB on cAMP production in the IMCD.
- The study found that aldosterone did not affect S6c-stimulated nitric oxide or cGMP accumulation in both cultured and acutely isolated IMCD. This indicates that aldosterone does not alter ETB signaling related to these pathways.
AI simplified
Introduction
Collecting duct (CD) endothelinâ1 (ETâ1) is an important regulator of CD Na+ and water reabsorption; CDâspecific knockout of ETâ1 causes renal salt retention and marked saltâsensitive hypertension (Ahn et al. 2004). This autocrine effect of ETâ1 is mediated in part by endothelin B receptors (ETB); activation of CD ETB inhibits epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC) activity (Bugaj et al. 2012) and vasopressin (AVP)âstimulated cAMP accumulation (Kohan et al. 1993); mice with CDâspecific ETB knockout have saltâsensitive hypertension (Ge et al. 2006). Thus, CDâderived ETâ1 autocrine activation of ETB exerts a natriuretic and diuretic effect.
The CD ETâ1/ETB system is potentially subject to regulation by multiple factors that modulate CD Na+ and water transport. Amongst these, aldosterone is of particular interest. Aldosterone is a key stimulator of CD ENaC activity, however the hormone also increases CD ETâ1 production (Gumz et al. 2003). Such enhancement of CD ETâ1 synthesis may serve as negative feedback for the saltâretaining effect of aldosterone. However, previous studies raise the possibility that, despite aldosteroneâstimulation of CD ETâ1, the mineralocorticoid may actually impair CD ETâ1 signaling. Aldosterone induced sulfenyl modification of ETB by reactive oxygen species in pulmonary endothelial cells caused decreased ETBâmediated nitric oxide (NO) formation, while antagonism of the mineralocorticoid receptor reduced aldosteroneâaugmented ROS production, normalized ETBâdepending NO production in endothelial cells, and improved cardiopulmonary hemodynamics in experimental pulmonary artery hypertension (Maron et al. 2012). In addition, recent studies found that aldosteroneâmediated sulfenic acid modification of ETB facilitates renal injury in experimental ischemia/reperfusion by decreasing ETB signaling; renal injury was improved by mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism (BarreraâChimal et al. 2016). These findings raise the possibility that aldosterone inhibits CD ETB signaling â such a scenario could potentially augment the saltâretaining effects of mineralocorticoids through decreased autocrine CD ETâ1/ETB system induced natriuresis (and diuresis).
Based on the above considerations, the current study was undertaken to test whether mineralocorticoid treatment reduces ETBâmediated signaling processes in the CD.
Endothelinâ1 activation of CD ETB involves several signaling systems. The inhibitory effect of ETB activation of AVPâstimulated cAMP accumulation is mediated by Gi (Kohan et al. 1993). In contrast, CD ETB, via Gq, activates Ca2+âdependent signaling, phospholipase C, ERK/Src and NO synthase 1 â processes described to partly mediate the inhibitory effects of ETâ1 on CD ENaC activity (Cramer et al. 2001; Bugaj et al. 2008). We examine both Gi (cAMP) and Gs (extracellular signalârelated kinase 1/2 [ERK1/2] and NO) pathways involved in CD ETB actions.
Materials and Methods
In vivo studies
Male Sprague Dawley rats weighing ~200 g were exposed to 3 days of a normal (0.3% Na+, Harlan Teklad, Indianapolis, IN) or low (0.01% Na+, Test Diet, St. Louis, MO) salt diet, or low salt diet + the mineralocorticoid desoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA). DOCA was administered at 7.15 mg/day subcutaneously via slow release pellets (50 mg 21âday release pellet, 3 pellets/rat for total of 150 mg/rat, Innovative Research, Sarasota, FL). All animal studies were conducted with the approval of the University of Utah Animal Care and Use Committee in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Acutely isolated IMCD
Rat and mouse inner medullas were removed, minced, and incubated at 37°C in 0.1% collagenase (type IV; Worthington) and 0.1% hyaluronidase (type IV, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in Hanks Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) containing 15 mmol/L HEPES (pH 7.4) for about 45 min. When nearly digested, 0.01% DNase (type I, Sigma) was added for 10 min. The suspension containing predominantly single cells and individual tubules was centrifuged and then subjected to two rounds of reâsuspension in 10% bovine serum albumin in HBSS and centrifuging at 400 g for 5 min. The final pellet was washed in HBSS.
Cell culture
The mouse IMCD cell line, mIMCD3, was used for all cell culture studies. Cells were grown to confluence in 24âwell plastic culture plates in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C; 50:50 DMEM/Fâ12 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1 mg/ml penicillin and 1 mg/ml streptomycin was used as growth medium. In all studies, cells were growth arrested for 3 h prior to study by removal of serum.
ERK assay
Cultured IMCD3 cells were incubated with vehicle or 2.8 ÎŒmol/L aldosterone for 48 h. Cells were then exposed to the ETBâspecific agonist, sarafotoxin 6c (S6c, 100 nmol/L, Tocris Bioscience, Minneapolis, MN) or vehicle in HBSS for 15 min at 37°C. Total and phosphorylated ERK1/2 were measured by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Abcam, Cambridge, MA). Acutely isolated IMCD from rats fed a normal salt diet were treated with S6c or vehicle as described above and assayed for total and phosphorylated ERK. Note that a commercially supplied lysate is used to generate the standard curves for ERK and phosphoâERK, hence the absolute values of ERK and phosphoâERK are unknown â only relative values can be reported.
Cyclic AMP assay
Acutely isolated IMCD from rats fed a normal, low salt or low salt diet + DOCA were incubated with 1 mmol/L isobutylmethylxanthine (IBMX) (to inhibit phosphodiesterases) for 30 min, then treated with 100 nmol/L S6c or vehicle in HBSS for 15 min at 37°C, followed by exposure to 100 nmol/L arginine vasopressin (AVP) for 10 min. Total cell cAMP was then assayed by EIA (Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY) as previously described (Stricklett et al. 2006). Total cell protein was determined by Bradford assay (BioâRad, Hercules, CA). IMCD3 cells were similarly treated with S6c and AVP, followed by determination of cAMP and total cell protein as above.
Cyclic GMP assay
Studies were done in cultured IMCD3 and acutely isolated IMCD from rats fed a normal salt diet or low salt diet + DOCA as described above. Cells were incubated with IBMX for 30 min and then treated with 100 nmol/L S6c or vehicle in HBSS for 15 min at 37°C. Total cell cGMP was then assayed by EIA (Enzo Life Sciences) and total cell protein determined. In a separate set of studies, cells were exposed to HBSS alone or containing 100 nmol/L S6c with 1 mmol/L LâNAME added during the IBMX preâincubation.
Nitric oxide assay
Studies were done in cultured IMCD3 and acutely isolated IMCD from rats fed a normal salt diet or low salt diet + DOCA as described above. Cells were incubated with 10 ÎŒmol/L 4âaminoâ5âmethylaminoâ2âČ,7âČâdifluorofluorescein diacetate (DAFâFMâDA, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA) in HBSS for 30 min at 37°C, then washed and allowed to rest for 30 min in HBSS. Cells were then treated with 100 nmol/L S6c or vehicle in HBSS for 15 min at 37°C. Fluorescence was determined using 495 nm excitation and 515 nm emission with a SpectraMax Gemini EM microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). Total cell protein was also determined.
Statistics
Data are presented as mean ± standard error. All data were analyzed by ANOVA with the post hoc Scheffe test. P < 0.05 was taken as significant.
Results
Aldosterone regulation of S6c induced ERK phosphorylation
The first series of studies were designed to test if aldosterone altered ETB signaling in the CD via Gs proteins; ERK phosphorylation was chosen for this purpose. To accomplish this, several model systems were tested. First, acutely isolated IMCD from mice and rats were tested for the ability of S6c to stimulate ERK phosphorylation. We were unable to detect any stimulatory effect of S6c at up to 100 nmol/L and for up to 15 min on ERK phosphorylation (vehicle: total ERK â 7.3 ± 0.6, phosphoâERK â 0.66 ± 0.04, phospho/total ERK â 8.35 ± 0.6%; S6c: total ERK â 6.4 ± 0.4, phosphoâERK â 0.49 ± 0.04, phospho/total ERK â 7.7 ± 0.3%; N = 8 each data point, values shown for rats [mice not shown but with similar results]). We next tested an IMCD cell line, IMCD3, which had been reported to have ETBâmediated ERK phosphorylation (Hyndman et al. 2012). Notably, this cell line is derived from the mouse; rat CD cell lines are not generally available. As shown in Figure 1, exposure to 100 nmol/L S6c increased ERK phosphorylation. To test the effect of aldosterone, IMCD3 cells were preâincubated with 2.8 ÎŒmol/L aldosterone for 48 h; this preâtreatment had no effect on the ability of S6c to enhance ERK phosphorylation. Notably, aldosterone alone, as has been repeatedly shown, increased ERK phosphorylation.
Effect of aldosterone (2.8mol/L for 48 h) on S6c (100 nmol/L for 15 min) stimulation of total ERK and ERK phosphorylation in IMCD3 cells.= 12 per data point. *< 0.05 versus same condition without S6c;< 0.05 versus baseline. Ό N P P #
Aldosterone regulation of S6c inhibition of AVPâstimulated cAMP production
The second series of studies were designed to test if aldosterone altered ETB signaling in the CD via Gi proteins; AVPâinduced cAMP accumulation was chosen for this purpose. As for ERK signaling, several model systems were tested. Since S6c stimulated ERK phosphorylation in IMCD3 cells, this approach was attempted first. While AVP increased cAMP accumulation in these cells, S6c had no inhibitory effect on AVPâinduced cAMP (vehicle alone â no cAMP detected, AVP â 0.33 ± 0.06 pmoles cAMP/ÎŒg protein, AVP+S6c â 0.29 ± 0.03 pmoles cAMP/ÎŒg protein, N = 8 each data point). This finding is in accord with previous studies showing the Gi proteinâmediated effects of ETâ1 are frequently lost when CD cells are cultured (Woodcock and Land 1992). Consequently, acutely isolated IMCD were examined. Acutely isolated mouse IMCD do manifest ETâ1 inhibition of AVPâstimulated cAMP accumulation (Strait et al. 2007), however the amount of tissue obtained, the magnitude of AVPâstimulated cAMP, the degree of ETBâmediated inhibition of AVPâstimulated cAMP, and the amount of ET receptors on acutely isolated mouse IMCD are far less for mouse as compared to rat IMCD (unpublished observations by our laboratory). Hence, acutely isolated rat IMCD were examined. S6c substantially inhibited AVPâstimulated cAMP content in acutely isolated rat IMCD (Fig. 2). Placing rats on a low salt diet for 3 days (to increase endogenous aldosterone) did not alter the magnitude of S6c inhibited AVPâstimulated cAMP. Further, treatment with DOCA for 3 days at supraphysiological doses on top of administration of a low salt diet also did not affect the degree of S6c inhibition of AVPâinduced cAMP.
Effect of S6c (100Â nmol/L for 15Â min) on vasopressin (100Â nmol/L for 10Â min) stimulated cAMP accumulation in acutely isolated IMCD from rats given 3Â days of a normal or low Nadiet, or low Nadiet and DOCA (7.15Â mg/day subcutaneously).=Â 12 per data point. *<Â 0.05 versus same condition without S6c;<Â 0.05 versus normal diet baseline. + + # N P P
Aldosterone regulation of S6câstimulated cGMP and NO accumulation
The final set of studies tested whether aldosterone altered ETBâstimulated NO and/or cGMP accumulation. No NO signal could be detected using DAFâFMâDA in IMCD3 cells. As a surrogate, S6câstimulated cGMP levels were assessed in IMCD3 cells: S6c comparably increased cGMP quantitatively in the presence or absence of prior exposure to 2.8 ÎŒmol/L aldosterone for 48 h (Fig. 3). That S6câstimulated cGMP was NOâdependent in IMCD3 cells was supported by the finding that 1 mmol/L LâNAME prevented S6câstimulated cGMP accumulation (1.9 ± 0.4 pmoles cGMP/mg protein in control ± LâNAME vs. 2.1 ± 0.3 pmoles cGMP/mg protein in S6c ± LâNAME, N = 5). In acutely isolated rat IMCD, S6c increased both NO (as assessed by DAFâFMâDA) and cGMP levels (Fig. 4). Placing rats on a low salt diet plus DOCA for 3 days did not alter the magnitude of S6c induced NO or cGMP (Fig. 4).
Effect of aldosterone (2.8mol/L for 48 h) on S6c (100 nmol/L for 15 min) stimulation of cGMP in IMCD3 cells.= 6 each data point. *< 0.05 versus same condition without S6c. Ό N P
Effect of S6c (100Â nmol/L for 15Â min) on NO (left panel) and cGMP (right panel) in acutely isolated IMCD from rats given 3Â days of a normal Nadiet or low Nadiet + DOCA (7.15Â mg/day subcutaneously).=Â 9â10 each data point. *<Â 0.05 versus same condition without S6c. + + N P
Discussion
Determination of the existence, or lack thereof, of aldosterone modification of CD ETB signaling is important since aldosterone, via modification of ETâ1 autocrine actions in the CD, could potentially impact urinary salt and water excretion and blood pressure. As discussed earlier, aldosterone stimulates CD ETâ1 production, while ETâ1, via activation of ETB in the CD, exerts natriuretic, diuretic and antihypertensive effects (potentially functioning as negative feedback for the saltâretaining effects of aldosterone). However, aldosterone can inactivate ETB signaling, thereby potentially offsetting the stimulatory effect of aldosterone on ETâ1 production. The aldosteroneâmediated ETB inactivation has been described in the context of downâregulation of pulmonary endothelial or renal NO production, most likely through reduced NOS3 activity (Maron et al. 2012; BarreraâChimal et al. 2016). However, ETB activates multiple pathways that could impact CD salt and water reabsorption, hence the current study assessed the initiating processes in such ETB signaling: activation of Gâproteinâdependent pathways.
The current study did not find evidence that aldosterone regulates CD ETB coupled Gs or Gi protein signaling. Looking at both of these signaling pathways was important in assessing ETB signaling since both have been reported to be involved in ETB actions in the CD. As stated previously, ETâ1 stimulation of Gq in CD ultimately leads to activation of phospholipase C, MAPK/Src and Ca2+âdependent signaling â processes described to partly mediate the inhibitory effects of ETâ1 on CD ENaC activity (Cramer et al. 2001; Bugaj et al. 2008). Importantly, ETâ1 activation of Gq is dependent upon palmitoylation, but not phosphorylation, of ET receptors (Cramer et al. 2001). Palmitoylation of ETB has been reported to occur at cysteine residues (amino acids 402, 403 and 405) (Okamoto et al. 1998); aldosterone, via cystenic acid modification of these cysteines, can lead to inactivation of ETB signaling (Maron et al. 2012; BarreraâChimal et al. 2016). In particular, mutation of these 3 cysteines in ETB leads to loss of Gs signaling (Okamoto et al. 1998). Endothelinâ1, via ETB, also activates Gi signaling which inhibits AVPâstimulated water reabsorption in the CD (Kohan et al. 1993). Mutation of ETB by deleting Cys403 and Cys405 prevented ETB coupling with Gi and abolished its inhibitory effect on adenylyl cyclase activity (Okamoto et al. 1998). Thus, key effects of CD ETB activation involve both Gs and Gi signaling; the lack of an effect of aldosterone on ETBâmediated coupling to these pathways does not support the notion that aldosterone inactivates key CD ETBâmediated signaling processes. Finally, we are able to compare our studies directly with those examining aldosterone inhibition of ETBâstimulated NO formation in other cell types (Maron et al. 2012) (BarreraâChimal et al. 2016); the lack of an effect of aldosterone on S6câstimulated NOâdependent cGMP accumulation in IMCD3 cells or on S6câstimulated NO and cGMP in acutely isolated rat IMCD indicates a clear difference in aldosterone regulation of ETB in endothelial as compared to IMCD cells.
In summary, the current studies suggest that aldosterone does not modify ETB signaling in the IMCD. Notably, a recent study using CDâspecific ETâ1 knockout mice is in accord with the results of the current study. In these experiments, CDâspecific ETâ1 knockout mice failed to escape from the saltâretaining effects of mineralocorticoids â renal Na+ retention and blood pressure rose over the 12 days of mineralocorticoid administration (Lynch et al. 2015). If mineralocorticoids inactivated CD ETB, then one would have expected CD ETâ1 KO to have a relatively modest, if any, effect on the pattern of escape from the Na+âretaining effects of mineralocorticoids. Thus, taken together, our and previous studies suggest that the IMCD ETâ1/ETB largely functions as a negative regulator of aldosterone saltâretaining effects in the IMCD and that aldosterone does not inhibit the activity of this compensatory system. Whether this lack of IMCD ETB signaling modulation by aldosterone occurs in the outer medullary and cortical CD, as well as in other nephron segments and renal cell types, remains to be determined.
Conflict of Interest
None.
Ramkumar N., Stuart D., Yang T., Kohan D. E.. Aldosterone does not alter endothelin B receptor signaling in the inner medullary collecting duct, Physiol Rep, 5 (5),2017, e13167, doi: 10.14814/phy2.13167â