World journal of gastroenterology···
Long-term methadone use linked to poor bowel visibility and unsuccessful colonoscopy
Updated
Abstract
Methadone-dependent patients had 40.3% poor bowel visualization compared to 6.9% in opioid-naive controls.
- A significantly greater percentage of methadone-dependent patients exhibited poor bowel preparation (35.8% vs 9.7%).
- The need for repeat colonoscopy was notably higher in methadone-dependent patients (32.8% vs 12.5%).
- Presence of solid stool was strongly associated with poor bowel visualization in methadone-dependent patients (odds ratio 13.5).
- Bowel preparation assessments were more likely to be fair or poor among methadone-dependent patients.
- Higher doses of methadone may correlate with poorer bowel visualization outcomes.
Simplified
AIM: To examine effects of chronic methadone usage on bowel visualization, preparation, and repeat colonoscopy.
METHODS: In-patient colonoscopy reports from October, 2004 to May, 2009 for methadone dependent (MD) patients were retrospectively evaluated and compared to matched opioid naive controls (C). Strict criteria were applied to exclude patients with risk factors known to cause constipation or gastric dysmotility. Colonoscopy reports of all eligible patients were analyzed for degree of bowel visualization, assessment of bowel preparation (good, fair, or poor), and whether a repeat colonoscopy was required. Bowel visualization was scored on a 4 point scale based on multiple prior studies: excellent = 1, good = 2, fair = 3, or poor = 4. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson χ(2) test were used for data analyses. Subgroup analysis included correlation between methadone dose and colonoscopy outcomes. All variables significantly differing between MD and C groups were included in both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. P values were two sided, and < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: After applying exclusionary criteria, a total of 178 MD patients and 115 C patients underwent a colonoscopy during the designated study period. A total of 67 colonoscopy reports for MD patients and 72 for C were included for data analysis. Age and gender matched controls were randomly selected from this population to serve as controls in a numerically comparable group. The average age for MD patients was 52.2 ± 9.2 years (range: 32-72 years) years compared to 54.6 ± 15.5 years (range: 20-81 years) for C (P = 0.27). Sixty nine percent of patients in MD and 65% in C group were males (P = 0.67). When evaluating colonoscopy reports for bowel visualization, MD patients had significantly greater percentage of solid stool (i.e., poor visualization) compared to C (40.3% vs 6.9%, P < 0.001). Poor bowel preparation (35.8% vs 9.7%, P < 0.001) and need for repeat colonoscopy (32.8% vs 12.5%, P = 0.004) were significantly higher in MD group compared to C, respectively. Under univariate analysis, factors significantly associated with MD group were presence of fecal particulate [odds ratio (OR), 3.89, 95% CI: 1.33-11.36, P = 0.01] and solid stool (OR, 13.5, 95% CI: 4.21-43.31, P < 0.001). Fair (OR, 3.82, 95% CI: 1.63-8.96, P = 0.002) and poor (OR, 8.10, 95% CI: 3.05-21.56, P < 0.001) assessment of bowel preparation were more likely to be associated with MD patients. Requirement for repeat colonoscopy was also significant higher in MD group (OR, 3.42, 95% CI: 1.44-8.13, P = 0.01). In the multivariate analyses, the only variable independently associated with MD group was presence of solid stool (OR, 7.77, 95% CI: 1.66-36.47, P = 0.01). Subgroup analysis demonstrated a general trend towards poorer bowel visualization with higher methadone dosage. ANOVA analysis demonstrated that mean methadone dose associated with presence of solid stool (poor visualization) was significantly higher compared to mean dosage for clean colon (excellent visualization, P = 0.02) or for those with liquid stool only (good visualization, P = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Methadone dependence is a risk factor for poor bowel visualization and leads to more repeat colonoscopies. More aggressive bowel preparation may be needed in MD patients.
Related papers
Jun '19
Comparing standard and changed bowel cleaning methods for colonoscopy in adults with cystic fibrosis
top 30% journal
cited by 11 papers
comparative study
Feb '18
Split-dose bowel preparation improves cleaning quality and doctors' following of colorectal cancer screening guidelines
cited by 5 papers
journal article
Dec '16
People with Both Diabetes and Narcotic Use Are Less Likely to Have Excellent Bowel Preparation Than Those with Only One Condition
top 20% journal
cited by 6 papers
journal article
Mar '20
Factors affecting how well patients prepare their bowels for hospital colonoscopy
cited by 11 papers
journal article
Oct '23
How Diabetes Drugs Affect Bowel Cleaning for Colonoscopy
top 5% journal
cited by 44 papers
journal article
Aug '14
How bowel cleaning quality affects early repeat colonoscopy and detection of growths
top 5% journal
cited by 227 papers
systematic review
Jul '16
Online Educational Video Improves Bowel Cleaning and Lowers Repeat Colonoscopy Within Three Years
top 20% journal
cited by 41 papers
journal article
Oct '16
Factors linked to poor bowel cleaning with 3 liters of polyethylene glycol before outpatient colonoscopy
top 20% journal
cited by 23 papers
observational study
Jul '24
How Bowel Cleaning Quality Affects Colonoscopy Results and Colorectal Cancer Deaths in a Nationwide Screening Program
top 5% journal
cited by 18 papers
journal article