Previous studies have shown that the circadian system of Japanese quail is composed of multiple photic inputs and multiple oscillators. Among these are extraretinal photoreceptors that mediate both circadian and photoperiodic responses and circadian pacemakers in the eyes that, via neural and hormonal outputs, help to maintain rhythmicity of central circadian clocks (presumably located in the suprachiasmatic area of the hypothalamus). Furthermore, a component of the central circadian system is influenced by reproductive hormones. Under certain conditions, the circadian system of female quail can be induced to split into two circadian components: one driven by ocular pacemakers and one driven by feedback from reproductive hormones. Importantly, ovulation is either inhibited or permitted as these two oscillators (or sets of oscillators) constantly change internal phase relationships with each other, suggesting an "internal coincidence" mechanism in the control of ovulation. The oviposition patterns of quail in light-dark (LD) cycles also support an internal coincidence mechanism. The authors tested the hypothesis that the ocular pacemakers are an important component of an internal coincidence mechanism controlling ovulation by examinig the effects of blinding by complete eye removal (EX), and the effects of eye-patching, on the body temperature and oviposition patterns of quail exposed to 24-h LD cycles. They also examined the effects of EX on quail exposed to continuous light (LL) and to continuous darkness (DD). Neither EX nor eye-patching affected the oviposition patterns of birds in LD. Furthermore, robust body temperature and oviposition rhythms continued in EX birds in LL, but body temperature became arrhythmic in DD with the cessation of ovulation. The results do not show a role for ocular pacemakers in the control of ovulation, but they do support the hypotheses that (1) entrainment of the central oscillators by extraretinally perceived light is sufficient to preserve a normal ovulatory pattern in LD in the absence of the ocular pacemakers, and (2) in LL, feedback of reproductive hormones onto the central oscillators is sufficient to organize the circadian system even in the absence of the ocular pacemakers. Whether or not the ocular pacemakers are normally involved in the control of ovulation is still an open question.
