Full text is available at the source.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews··
Citalopram compared to other antidepressants for treating depression
Updated
Abstract
Citalopram was found to be more effective than paroxetine and reboxetine in treating major depression.
- Citalopram demonstrated significantly less effectiveness compared to escitalopram in achieving an acute response.
- Fewer patients taking citalopram withdrew from trials due to adverse events compared to those on tricyclics.
- Patients on citalopram reported fewer side effects than those on reboxetine and venlafaxine.
- The evidence suggests varying levels of efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability among citalopram and other antidepressants.
Simplified
BACKGROUND: Recent US and UK clinical practice guidelines recommend that second-generation antidepressants should be considered amongst the best first-line options when drug therapy is indicated for a depressive episode. Systematic reviews have already highlighted some differences in efficacy between second-generation antidepressants. Citalopram, one of the first selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) introduced in the market, is one of these antidepressant drugs that clinicians use for routine depression care.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the evidence for the efficacy, acceptability and tolerability of citalopram in comparison with tricyclics, heterocyclics, other SSRIs and other conventional and non-conventional antidepressants in the acute-phase treatment of major depression.
SEARCH METHODS: We searched The Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Controlled Trials Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to February 2012. No language restriction was applied. We contacted pharmaceutical companies and experts in this field for supplemental data.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials allocating patients with major depression to citalopram versus any other antidepressants.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data. Information extracted included study characteristics, participant characteristics, intervention details and outcome measures in terms of efficacy (the number of patients who responded or remitted), patient acceptability (the number of patients who failed to complete the study) and tolerability (side-effects).
MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-seven trials compared citalopram with other antidepressants (such as tricyclics, heterocyclics, SSRIs and other antidepressants, either conventional ones, such as mirtazapine, venlafaxine and reboxetine, or non-conventional, like hypericum). Citalopram was shown to be significantly less effective than escitalopram in achieving acute response (odds ratio (OR) 1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08 to 2.02), but more effective than paroxetine (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.96) and reboxetine (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.91). Significantly fewer patients allocated to citalopram withdrew from trials due to adverse events compared with patients allocated to tricyclics (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.78) and fewer patients allocated to citalopram reported at least one side effect than reboxetine or venlafaxine (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.97 and OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.88, respectively).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Some statistically significant differences between citalopram and other antidepressants for the acute phase treatment of major depression were found in terms of efficacy, tolerability and acceptability. Citalopram was more efficacious than paroxetine and reboxetine and more acceptable than tricyclics, reboxetine and venlafaxine, however, it seemed to be less efficacious than escitalopram. As with most systematic reviews in psychopharmacology, the potential for overestimation of treatment effect due to sponsorship bias and publication bias should be borne in mind when interpreting review findings. Economic analyses were not reported in the included studies, however, cost effectiveness information is needed in the field of antidepressant trials.
Related papers
Apr '14
Paroxetine compared to other antidepressants for treating depression
cited by 20 papers
systematic review
Oct '12
Duloxetine compared to other antidepressants for treating depression
cited by 35 papers
systematic review
Dec '13
Fluoxetine compared to other depression medications
cited by 39 papers
systematic review
Dec '13
Agomelatine compared to other antidepressants for major depression
cited by 44 papers
systematic review
Jan '10
Sertraline compared to other antidepressants for depression
cited by 10 papers
systematic review
May '21
Comparing new antidepressants for depression in children and teenagers
cited by 77 papers
systematic review
May '15
SSRIs and SNRIs for preventing tension headaches in adults
cited by 22 papers
systematic review