BMJ open

Clinical and metabolic differences between continuous and intermittent tube feeding in ventilated adults with shock

Updated

Abstract

A total of 174 critically ill patients will be enrolled to evaluate the effects of intermittent versus continuous enteral nutrition.

  • Intermittent enteral nutrition may activate protective metabolic pathways by mimicking fasting.
  • Continuous enteral nutrition could inhibit processes such as autophagy and ketogenesis.
  • The primary outcome measures changes in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score over 7 days.
  • Secondary outcomes include nutritional intake, metabolic markers, gastrointestinal tolerance, and infection rates.
  • Quality of life will be assessed at the time of discharge.

Simplified

Key numbers

174
Total Participants
Total number of patients to be included in the trial.
4
SOFA Score Change
Expected difference in SOFA score between the two feeding strategies.

Full Text

We can’t show the full text here under this license.

Funding

Competing interests

Competing interests: None declared.
PubMed

What Lands in Your Inbox Each Week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free