Scientific reports

Comparing gene editing methods in Candida auris shows unreliable DNA insertion but effective plasmid-based changes

Updated

Abstract

Essence

In Candida auris, episomal editing worked better than genome-integration systems, which often failed to insert the editing cassette correctly.

Evidence

A systematic fungal genome-editing comparison across four CRISPR-Cas9 systems in C. auris found strain-dependent efficiencies, no correct linear cassette integration in more than 4,900 screened transformants for integration-based methods, and 41.9% correct transformants on average for the plasmid-based system.

Caveat

This is a methodological study in a fungal pathogen, and the main negative result was widespread ectopic rather than correct cassette integration, limiting confidence in integration-based editing workflows.

Simplified

Key numbers

41.9%
Correct Percentage
Average percentage of correct from the EPIC system.
6.5
per System
Average number of per transformation round for the EPIC system.
4,900
Count
Total number of screened for correct integration.

Full Text

We can’t show the full text here under this license.

Funding

Competing interests

2 of 11
authors report competing interests
9 report none
PubMed

What Lands in Your Inbox Each Week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free