Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue

Comparing the effects of dexmedetomidine and midazolam in severe COVID-19 patients using non-invasive breathing support

Updated

Abstract

A total of 14 patients received dexmedetomidine, while 9 received midazolam for sedation during non-invasive ventilation for severe COVID-19.

  • Both dexmedetomidine and midazolam maintained Ramsay scores of 2-3 after sedation, which were higher than the control group at various time points.
  • Mean arterial pressure (MAP) significantly decreased after sedation in both sedative groups compared to the control, particularly after 1 and 24 hours.
  • Heart rate (HR) was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group after 12 hours compared to the control group.
  • Arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) increased and respiratory rate (RR) decreased in all groups after ventilation, with significant improvements in the sedative groups compared to control after 12 hours.
  • Sleep duration was longer in both dexmedetomidine and midazolam groups compared to control, with no significant difference between the two sedative groups.
  • Adverse events were reported in all groups, with specific cases of excessive sedation and intubation noted in the midazolam and dexmedetomidine groups.

Simplified

What Lands in Your Inbox Each Week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free