[A comparative study on clinical effects of dexmedetomidine and midazolam on patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 on non-invasive ventilation].

Jul 21, 2020Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue

Comparing the effects of dexmedetomidine and midazolam in severe COVID-19 patients using non-invasive breathing support

AI simplified

Abstract

A total of 14 patients received dexmedetomidine, while 9 received midazolam for sedation during non-invasive ventilation for severe COVID-19.

  • Both dexmedetomidine and midazolam maintained Ramsay scores of 2-3 after sedation, which were higher than the control group at various time points.
  • Mean arterial pressure (MAP) significantly decreased after sedation in both sedative groups compared to the control, particularly after 1 and 24 hours.
  • Heart rate (HR) was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group after 12 hours compared to the control group.
  • Arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) increased and respiratory rate (RR) decreased in all groups after ventilation, with significant improvements in the sedative groups compared to control after 12 hours.
  • Sleep duration was longer in both dexmedetomidine and midazolam groups compared to control, with no significant difference between the two sedative groups.
  • Adverse events were reported in all groups, with specific cases of excessive sedation and intubation noted in the midazolam and dexmedetomidine groups.

AI simplified

what lands in your inbox each week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free