Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

May 15, 2025EClinicalMedicine

Comparing two malaria prevention treatments during pregnancy: dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine

AI simplified

Abstract

Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine was associated with a 69% lower incidence of clinical malaria during pregnancy compared to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.

  • Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine resulted in a 62% lower risk of placental parasitaemia.
  • Moderate maternal anaemia was 17% less common with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, though differences in maternal weight gain favored sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.
  • No statistically significant differences were observed in the composite adverse pregnancy outcome or in individual components such as fetal loss and preterm birth.
  • Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was linked to a 15% lower risk of small-for-gestational-age births, particularly among multigravidae.
  • Infant stunting and underweight by two months were significantly lower in the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine group among multigravidae.
  • Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was associated with higher newborn birthweight and improved growth metrics compared to dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine.

AI simplified

Full Text

We can’t show the full text here under this license. Use the link below to read it at the source.

what lands in your inbox each week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free