EClinicalMedicine

Comparing two malaria prevention treatments during pregnancy: dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine

Updated

Abstract

Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine was associated with a 69% lower incidence of clinical malaria during pregnancy compared to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.

  • Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine resulted in a 62% lower risk of placental parasitaemia.
  • Moderate maternal anaemia was 17% less common with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, though differences in maternal weight gain favored sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.
  • No statistically significant differences were observed in the composite adverse pregnancy outcome or in individual components such as fetal loss and preterm birth.
  • Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was linked to a 15% lower risk of small-for-gestational-age births, particularly among multigravidae.
  • Infant stunting and underweight by two months were significantly lower in the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine group among multigravidae.
  • Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was associated with higher newborn birthweight and improved growth metrics compared to dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine.

Simplified

Full Text

We can’t show the full text here under this license.

Funding

Competing interests

JRG has served as the co-Chair of the Roll Back Malaria, Malaria in Pregnancy Working Group and as a member of the Data Safety Monitoring Boards for the PYRAPREG and ASPIRE trials; no compensation was received. JH and FOtK reports funding from EDCTP2 supported by the European Union (grant number TRIA-2015-1076-IMPROVE), and the MRC/DFID/Wellcome Trust's Joint Global Health Trials scheme, and the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency. All other authors declare no competing interests.
PubMed

What Lands in Your Inbox Each Week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free