Engineering in life sciences

Better Cell Entry of Small Cas Proteins: Comparing Cas12f and Cas9 in Human Cells

Updated

Abstract

Essence

Compact Cas proteins such as Cas12f may enter human cells more efficiently than Cas9.

Evidence

This brief comparative delivery experiment in human cells used delivery vectors to compare cellular uptake of compact Cas12f with larger Cas9.

Caveat

The abstract reports uptake rather than editing performance or therapeutic outcomes, so clinical advantage remains preliminary.

Simplified

Key numbers

90%
Uptake Percentage at 24 Hours
Percentage of cells with uptake after 24 hours post-transfection.
250 nm vs. 1100 nm
Size Comparison
of compared to Cas9 .

Key figures

FIGURE 1
Workflow for preparing and testing cellular uptake of and Cas9 complexes
Sets up a clear workflow to compare cellular uptake efficiency of compact Cas12f versus larger Cas9 complexes
ELSC-25-e70042-g002
  • Panel 1
    Expression and purification of recombinant Cas12f protein
  • Panel 2
    Design and fluorescent labeling of Cas12f single guide RNA ()
  • Panel 3
    Formation of Cas12f/gRNA ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex and assessment of nuclease activity
  • Panel 4
    Encapsulation of functional RNP complexes within and measurement of nanoparticle size and charge
  • Panel 5
    Treatment of HEK293 cells with RNP complexes
  • Panel 6
    Evaluation of cellular uptake by fluorescence microscopy and using
FIGURE 2
Binding, size, charge, and particle images of Cas9 and complexes with
Highlights smaller particle size and distinct complexing ratios for Cas12f versus Cas9, spotlighting delivery-relevant properties.
ELSC-25-e70042-g001
  • Panel A
    showing Cas9 and Cas12f binding with PF14 peptide at increasing molar ratios; Cas9 fully complexes at ratio 40, Cas12f at ratio 80, indicated by retention in wells.
  • Panel B
    data showing smaller hydrodynamic diameters for Cas12f/ complexes (~250 nm) compared to Cas9/PF14 (~1100 nm) at low ratios; both condense to ~150–200 nm with positive charge at ratios 50 and above.
  • Panel C
    images of Cas9/PF14 and Cas12f/PF14 particles at 1:100 molar ratio showing particle diameters of 50–120 nm.
FIGURE 3
Cas9 vs : cellular uptake and fluorescence intensity in HEK293 cells at 6 and 24 hours post-transfection
Highlights consistently higher molecular uptake and fluorescence intensity of smaller Cas12f compared to Cas9 across delivery methods and timepoints
ELSC-25-e70042-g003
  • Panels A(i) and B(i)
    Fluorescence microscopy images and histograms showing uptake of Cas9 (red) and Cas12f (orange) delivered by or Lipofectamine at 6 h (A) and 24 h (B); visibly higher fluorescence intensity peaks for Cas12f compared to Cas9 in both delivery methods
  • Panels A(ii) and B(ii)
    Bar graphs quantifying uptake percentage and (MFIR) at 6 h (A) and 24 h (B); uptake percentages above 90% for both Cas9 and Cas12f with PF14, but below 50% with Lipofectamine; MFIR significantly higher for Cas12f than Cas9 regardless of delivery method
1 / 3

Full Text

What this is

  • This research examines the delivery efficiency of compact Cas proteins, specifically Cas12f, compared to the larger Cas9 in human cells.
  • Efficient delivery of systems is crucial for their therapeutic applications, yet traditional larger Cas proteins face delivery challenges due to their size.
  • The study utilizes amphipathic carriers to enhance cellular uptake of Cas12f, demonstrating its potential as a more effective alternative for CRISPR-based therapies.

Essence

  • Compact Cas proteins, such as Cas12f, enhance cellular uptake compared to the larger Cas9, suggesting improved delivery efficiency for CRISPR therapies.

Key takeaways

  • Cas12f achieve significantly higher uptake in human cells compared to Cas9 , indicating improved delivery potential for CRISPR applications.
  • At 24 hours post-transfection, Cas12f maintained higher uptake levels than Cas9, suggesting its sustained presence and effectiveness in cells.
  • Particle size analysis shows that Cas12f are smaller than Cas9 , which correlates with their enhanced cellular uptake.

Caveats

  • The study primarily focuses on cellular uptake and does not evaluate the nuclease activity or long-term effects of Cas12f in therapeutic contexts.
  • Further research is needed to optimize delivery vectors and assess the performance of compact Cas proteins in relevant disease models.

Definitions

  • CRISPR-Cas: A genome-editing technology that allows for precise modifications of genetic material.
  • RNP: Ribonucleoprotein complex formed by the combination of RNA and protein, crucial for CRISPR function.

Simplified

Funding

Competing interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
PubMed

What Lands in Your Inbox Each Week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free