What this is
- This research identifies female-specific in mud crabs, contributing to understanding their sex determination system.
- Using RAD-seq technology, the study isolates 20 that differentiate between male and female crabs.
- A rapid molecular method for genetic sex identification was developed, applicable to multiple mud crab species.
Essence
- The study identifies female-specific in mud crabs, supporting a and enabling rapid genetic sex identification.
Key takeaways
- Twenty female-specific were identified in Scylla paramamosain, demonstrating a .
- A PCR-based method for genetic sex identification achieved 100% accuracy in distinguishing sexes in Scylla paramamosain, S. tranquebarica, and S. serrata.
- Nine and four female-specific were also detected in S. tranquebarica and S. serrata, respectively, indicating shared genetic traits.
Caveats
- The study's findings are based on a limited number of specimens, which may affect the generalizability of the results.
- Further research is needed to explore the genetic sex determination mechanisms in other crab species.
Definitions
- SNP markers: Single nucleotide polymorphisms that serve as genetic markers for distinguishing between sexes.
- WZ/ZZ sex determination system: A genetic system where females are WZ and males are ZZ, differing from the XY/XX system.
Simplified
Background
Sex determination mechanisms of animals are remarkably diverse and complicated, and they are attracting considerable interest due to its great implication in both theory and practice [1–3]. Unlike vertebrates, the sex determination mechanisms of crustaceans are more varied and frequently affected by genetic and/or environmental factors [4, 5]. Among crustaceans, several crab species, including Plagusia dentipes, Eriocheir japonicus and Hemigrapsus sanguineus, are thought to have a XY/XX sex determination system based on karyotype studies [6–8]. However, a recent study suggested that Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) exhibited a WZ/ZZ sex determination system according to quantitative trait locus location of the gender phenotype [5]. Meanwhile, the WZ/ZZ sex determination system has also been observed in other crustaceans, such as kuruma prawn (Penaeus japonicus) [9], Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) [10], and giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) [11]. Importantly, studies on the genetic basis of sex determination mechanism are the foundation towards future sex manipulation biotechnologies, including the development of mono-sex population [2, 12], especially for those crabs with significant sexual dimorphism, such as caribbean king crab (Mithrax spinosissimus) [13] and Japanese mitten crab (Eriocheir japonica) [14]. So far, the sex determination mechanism remains unclear in most aquaculture crustacean species, which have therefore obviously limited its potential application in the aquaculture sector.
Generally, there are three popular types of techniques for studying sex determination mechanism, i.e. cytogenetic approaches, breeding experiments, and sex-specific molecular markers [15]. The application of cytogenetic analysis is limited because some species lack visually heteromorphic sex chromosomes, while breeding experiments are mainly focused on several common species, and therefore impracticable for many species. The use of sex-linked or sex-specific markers is regarded as a powerful tool for well-understanding sex determination system in most species [2, 12, 16].
Over the last few decades, various genetic approaches have been successfully applied to identify sex-specific DNA sequences or markers in a range of aquaculture fish and crustacean species. For example, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) for turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) [17], amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) for swimming crab (Portunus trituberculatus) [18] and Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) [19], as well as simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers for half-smooth tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis) [20, 21] and rock bream (Oplegnathus fasciatus) [22]. Currently, with the rapid development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, some novel methods have been developed for exploring sex-associated DNA markers [3, 23]. NGS-based marker systems allow highly efficient DNA markers development within a short period [24]. Restriction-site associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq) is based on NGS technologies and can discover massive single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in various species by sequencing parts of the genome at high depth, without a reference genome [23, 25–27]. Recently, RAD-seq was successfully used to develop sex-specific markers in aquaculture species, such as Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) [28], European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) [25], and silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) [3].
Mud crabs (Scylla spp.) are highly valuable commercial aquaculture species and fishery resources in the Indo-West Pacific region, such as China [29], Thailand [30], Vietnam [31], Philippines [32] and Malaysia [33]. The aquaculture output of mud crab in China reached approximately 148,977 tons, the top among all marine commercial crabs [34]. Although the farming and fishing output of mud crab increased tremendously in recent years, the current scale of production is still too inadequate to meet the market demand [35]. A major challenge in mud crab aquaculture industry presently is how to develop a set of fast and viable seed production techniques so as to improve supply [36]. Additionally, Scylla paramamosain, one of mud crab species, exhibits significant sexual dimorphism in growth rate and body size, with females growing faster and having higher nutritive value than males [37]. Thus, it is essential to develop sex-linked markers for production of mono-sex breeding, shortening farming duration, as well as understanding the genetic basis of sex determination system [3, 28]. However, there is currently no available genetic information on sex determination system for these economically important crustacean species.
In the present study, RAD-seq technology was employed to identify and characterize sex-specific SNP markers in mud crab S. paramamosain. A rapid and reliable molecular method based on the female-specific SNP markers was developed to identify the genetic sex of individuals at early developmental stages. Further, the developed PCR-based genetic sex identification method was applied in two other mud crab species, S. tranquebarica and S. serrata. The results suggest a WZ/ZZ sex determination system in S. paramamosain, S. tranquebarica and S. serrata. These findings will provide new insights into the mechanism of sex determination in brachyuran crabs, as well as facilitate the development of mono-sex population of mud crab and related crustacean species.
Results
RAD sequencing
| Sample | Barcode | Raw reads | Raw bases | Clean reads | Clean bases | Average read length (bp) | Clean reads rate (%) | Clean bases rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | ||||||||
| F1A | ACGTA | 24,557,238 | 3,646,738,259 | 21,847,092 | 2,757,935,713 | 126.2 | 88.96% | 75.63% |
| F2A | ACTGC | 29,997,130 | 4,454,521,671 | 26,462,942 | 3,348,677,805 | 126.5 | 88.22% | 75.17% |
| F9A | AGAGT | 18,726,918 | 2,780,858,197 | 16,501,732 | 2,088,286,211 | 126.5 | 88.12% | 75.10% |
| F1C | ACGTA | 23,229,362 | 3,449,530,993 | 19,460,818 | 2,596,836,132 | 133.4 | 83.78% | 75.28% |
| F2C | ACTGC | 9,141,424 | 1,357,421,834 | 6,843,196 | 907,264,996 | 132.6 | 74.86% | 66.84% |
| F3C | AGAGT | 31,790,388 | 4,720,690,658 | 26,567,472 | 3,549,305,187 | 133.6 | 83.57% | 75.19% |
| F5C | ACCAT | 34,198,658 | 5,078,387,213 | 28,275,808 | 3,771,444,128 | 133.4 | 82.68% | 74.26% |
| F6C | ACGTA | 4,878,130 | 724,383,091 | 3,886,802 | 518,537,398 | 133.4 | 79.68% | 71.58% |
| F8C | ACTGC | 19,956,292 | 2,963,456,904 | 16,356,092 | 2,192,594,425 | 134.1 | 81.96% | 73.99% |
| F9C | AGAGT | 8,210,240 | 1,219,076,028 | 6,687,572 | 896,711,413 | 134.1 | 81.45% | 73.56% |
| Subtotal | – | 204,685,780 | 30,395,064,848 | 172,889,526 | 22,627,593,408 | – | – | – |
| Subaverage | – | 20,468,578 | 3,039,506,485 | 17,288,953 | 2,262,759,341 | 131.4 | 83.33% | 73.66% |
| Male | ||||||||
| M1A | ACCAT | 13,510,792 | 2,006,303,898 | 11,718,538 | 1,480,652,251 | 126.4 | 86.73% | 73.80% |
| M3A | ACGTA | 4,760,476 | 706,930,686 | 3,924,978 | 515,736,898 | 131.4 | 82.45% | 72.95% |
| M5A | ACTGC | 9,174,030 | 1,362,343,455 | 7,514,458 | 990,015,495 | 131.7 | 81.91% | 72.67% |
| M6A | AGAGT | 11,568,106 | 1,717,863,741 | 9,898,912 | 1,304,979,357 | 131.8 | 85.57% | 75.97% |
| M8A | ACCAT | 12,354,600 | 1,834,658,100 | 10,442,804 | 1,378,972,481 | 132.1 | 84.53% | 75.16% |
| M2C | ACCAT | 10,770,088 | 1,599,284,962 | 8,790,688 | 1,178,460,368 | 134.1 | 81.62% | 73.69% |
| M3C | ACGTA | 30,743,266 | 4,565,350,471 | 27,115,768 | 3,471,064,019 | 128 | 88.20% | 76.03% |
| M4C | ACTGC | 19,284,772 | 2,863,734,056 | 16,257,120 | 2,114,310,426 | 130.1 | 84.30% | 73.83% |
| M6C | AGAGT | 6,010,814 | 892,543,605 | 4,944,440 | 640,757,057 | 129.6 | 82.26% | 71.79% |
| M7C | ACCAT | 12,737,454 | 1,891,463,037 | 10,727,510 | 1,395,530,197 | 130.1 | 84.22% | 73.78% |
| Subtotal | – | 130,914,398 | 19,440,476,011 | 111,335,216 | 14,470,478,549 | – | – | – |
| Subaverage | – | 13,091,440 | 1,944,047,601 | 11,133,522 | 1,447,047,855 | 130.5 | 84.18% | 73.97% |
| Total | – | 335,600,178 | 49,835,540,859 | 284,224,742 | 37,098,071,957 | – | – | – |
| Average | – | 16,780,009 | 2,491,777,043 | 14,211,237 | 1,854,903,598 | 131 | 83.75% | 73.81% |
Identification of sex-specific SNP markers
Ten female-specific SNP markers in the sequencing chromatograms of the sex-related sequence of. SNP1: C/T; SNP2: C/T; SNP3: C/T; SNP4: T/C; SNP5: G/A; SNP6: C/T; SNP7: A/T; SNP8: T/G; SNP9: A/T; SNP10: A/T Scylla paramamosain
| Name | Reference sequence | Primers (5′-3′) | Annealing temperature (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4307a | Cluster_121142 | F: TTTGCTTTTTTTGTCTTATGGTTC | 52 |
| R: AAACAAATTTACTGAAAACGTGTCT | |||
| 8966a | Cluster_136335 | F: TATAGAGTGCTTTGCATCAATT | 51 |
| R: TTCAAAACAAAATTACTGAAAAC | |||
| 6579a | Cluster_164559 | F: CCTTGTGGTTCTTTTGAAC | 50 |
| R: AACGAAATTACTGAAAACTTG | |||
| 9673a | Cluster_22418 | F: TCATAGGTACCAAGATGCC | 55 |
| R: GGTTTCTCGTAATGTCGTT | |||
| 8171a | Cluster_31265 | F: GAAAACGTGTCTTCCCAGTG | 54 |
| R: ATATACACGAAGGTTTGCGTT | |||
| 11,508a | Cluster_384014 | F: GCTTATCATAGTTATTGCCTTGT | 53 |
| R: TGCACTCATGCTGGATTTT | |||
| 1888a | Cluster_39896 | F: GATTTCATCATCACCGACG | 57 |
| R: GCAATTCTTGTCTGAGCATG | |||
| 4225a | Cluster_4545 | F: CAGCCCCGACATTAAGGC | 56 |
| R: ATATACTGCAATTCTAATGCCAGG | |||
| 9132a | Cluster_4856 | F: ATTATTCTGGTGACTAACA | 55 |
| R: GCTAAAACTTCTTTATAGAG | |||
| 5476a | Cluster_71436 | F: CTATATTGTTAATTGTTTTGGTGAC | 53 |
| R: TCATCTTCATAGGTACCAATATCA | |||
| FLFE-1b | Genome sequence | F: GTACTCTTTAATCAGTTTGTGCCCAT | 53 |
| R: CTGCCAGTGATTCAGTGACTTAGC | |||
| FLFE-2b | Genome sequence | F: ATGTTTATTGTGTTGTTCAGTGTTGTCT | 53 |
| R: CGAGGGTTACTGTAGTTAATGGC | |||
| SPCc | Extended sequence of female-specific fragment | F: GTTCTGCTTATCATAGTTATTGCCTTG | 65 |
| R: CTGCCAGTGATTCAGTGACTTAGC | |||
| SPFSc | Cluster_384014 | F:TTAGTATATCACAACACATCAGATGCTGT | 65 |
| R: AAGATGCTTGCTGTCTCATTGGT |
| No. | Marker Name | SNP Position | Reference Base | Alternative Base | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sequence | Sequence length | Position | ||||
| 1 | SNP-4307 | Cluster_121142 | 306 | 140 | T | A |
| 2 | SNP-8966-1 | Cluster_136335 | 294 | 242 | T | C |
| 3 | SNP-8966-2 | Cluster_136335 | 294 | 265 | G | A |
| 4 | SNP-6579-1 | Cluster_164559 | 299 | 205 | C | T |
| 5 | SNP-6579-2 | Cluster_164559 | 299 | 236 | T | C |
| 6 | SNP-9673-1 | Cluster_22418 | 246 | 128 | C | T |
| 7 | SNP-9673-2 | Cluster_22418 | 246 | 133 | A | T |
| 8 | SNP-9673-3 | Cluster_22418 | 246 | 231 | T | A |
| 9 | SNP-8171 | Cluster_31265 | 290 | 214 | C | G |
| 10 | SNP-11508 | Cluster_384014 | 285 | 70 | T | C |
| 11 | SNP-1888 | Cluster_39896 | 319 | 294 | T | C |
| 12 | SNP-572 | Cluster_40,991 | 297 | 285 | T | A |
| 13 | SNP-4225-1 | Cluster_4545 | 317 | 98 | A | G |
| 14 | SNP-4225-2 | Cluster_4545 | 317 | 143 | T | C |
| 15 | SNP-4225-3 | Cluster_4545 | 317 | 285 | T | A |
| 16 | SNP-9132-1 | Cluster_4856 | 320 | 198 | C | T |
| 17 | SNP-9132-2 | Cluster_4856 | 320 | 226 | T | C |
| 18 | SNP-5476-1 | Cluster_71436 | 243 | 13 | T | C |
| 19 | SNP-5476-2 | Cluster_71436 | 243 | 133 | G | C |
| 20 | SNP-5476-3 | Cluster_71436 | 243 | 148 | T | A |
Development of the PCR-based genetic sex identification method
Part of female-related DNA sequence cloned based on the genome sequence ofThe red color letters in the sequence indicate the ten female-specific SNPs, where SNP1: C/T; SNP2: C/T; SNP3: C/T; SNP4: T/C; SNP5: G/A; SNP6: C/T; SNP7: A/T; SNP8: T/G; SNP9: A/T; SNP10: A/T. The underlined text indicated the primer binding sites in the PCR-based genetic sex identification method, where Control-F and Control-R were the control primer (SPC) binding sites, and Female-specific-F and Female-specific-R were the female-specific primer (SPFS) binding sites Scylla paramamosain.
Application of the PCR-based genetic sex identification method in. Female-specific band (320 bp): PCR products amplified with the female-specific primer (SPFS); Control band (282 bp): PCR products amplified with control primer (SPC); M: marker;: the agarose gel electrophoresis results for 12 females and 12 males cultured in a pond at Shantou, China.: the agarose gel electrophoresis results for another 12 females and 12 males cultured in a pond at Shantou, China Scylla paramamosain a b
Application of the molecular genetic sex identification method to individuals at early developmental stages
| Developmental stage | Number of offspring | Number of females | Number of males | Sex ratioa | Pb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Megalopa stage (M) | 60 | 30 | 30 | 1 | 1 |
| First crablet stage (C1) | 60 | 24 | 36 | 0.67 | 0.271 |
| Second crablet stage (C2) | 60 | 25 | 35 | 0.71 | 0.36 |
| Total | 180 | 79 | 101 | 0.78 | 0.245 |
Cross-species application of the molecular genetic sex identification method and identification of sex-specific SNP markers
Application of the PCR-based genetic sex identification method in three other species of genus. Female-specific band (320 bp): PCR products amplified with female-specific primer (SPFS); The PCR-based genetic sex identification method was effective forandbut not for, even though an extremely faint band exhibited in male individuals of Scylla S. tranquebarica S. serrata, S. olivacea S. serrata
| Species | Gender | Nucleobases in each SNP marker | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNP1 | SNP2 | SNP3 | SNP4 | SNP5 | SNP6 | SNP7 | SNP8 | SNP9 | SNP10 | ||
| Scylla paramamosain | F | C/T | C/T | C/T | T/C | G/A | C/T | A/T | T/G | A/T | A/T |
| M | C | C | C | T | G | C | A | T | A | A | |
| Scylla tranquebarica | F1 | C | C/T | C/T | T/C | G/A | C/T | A/T | T/G | A/T | A/T |
| F2 | C | C/T | C/T | T/C | G/A | C/T | A/T | T/G | A/T | A/T | |
| F3 | C | C/T | C/T | T/C | G/A | C/T | A/T | T/G | A/T | A/T | |
| M1 | C | C | C | T | G | C | A | T | A | A | |
| M2 | C | C | C | T | G | C | A | T | A | A | |
| M3 | C | C | C | T | G | C | A | T | A | A | |
| Scylla serrata | F1 | C | C/T | C/T | T | G | C | A/C | T | A/T | A/T |
| F2 | C | C/T | C/T | T | G | C | A/C | T | A/T | A/T | |
| F3 | C | C/T | C/T | T | G/A | C | A | T/G | A/T | A/T | |
| M1 | C | C | C | T | G | C | A | T | A | A | |
| M2 | C | C | C | T | G | C | A | T | A | A | |
| M3 | C | C | C | T | G | C | A | T | A | A | |
| Syclla olivacea | F1 | C | C | C | T | G | C | A/T | T | A | A/T |
| F2 | C | C | C | T | G | C | A | T | A | A/T | |
| F3 | C | C/T | C | T/C | G/A | C/T | A/T | T/G | A | A/T | |
| M1 | C | C | C | T | G | C | A | T | A | A/T | |
| M2 | C | C | C | T | G | C | A | T/G | A | A/T | |
| M3 | C | C | C | T | G/A | C | A/T | T/G | A | A/T | |
Discussion
Studies on sex determination system of crabs are much limited. In the latter part of the last century, the XY/XX sex determination system was suggested for crabs [8, 38], but recently, the WZ/ZZ sex determination system was found in Chinese mitten crab [5]. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to focus on the sex determination system of genus Scylla. Here, 10 female-specific SNP markers were verified from DNA sequence in 195 individuals of S. paramamosain. These identified SNP markers were heterozygous in all females but homozygous in all males, suggesting a WZ/ZZ female heterogametic sex determination system in S. paramamosain. Additionally, the female-specific SNP markers were detected in a short DNA sequence of both females and males, which indicated the W and Z chromosomes of S. paramamosain are not fully differentiated from each other at DNA level and there are still many homologous loci, as suggested by Cui et al. [5]. The stable sex-specific genetic markers deteced in this study may due to the meiotic recombination suppression between sex chromosomes [39–41].
Sex determination system is essential not only for the study of reproductive biology and the process of genome evolution [5, 42], but also for the development of sex manipulation techniques, especially in economically important species with obvious sexual dimorphic characters such as mud crab. Given the large number of chromosomes in crustaceans, to elucidate the sex determination system using cytogenetic investigations and high-resolution linkage map is challenging [5]. Fortunately, sex-linked DNA markers provides an alternative tool to study sex determination system and it has shown great potential application in various aquaculture species [3, 27, 43]. In this study, the sex-linked SNPs provide a strong evidence for chromosomal sex determination system and serve as a crucial foundation for development of mono-sex population of S. paramamosain [2, 12]. Additionally, these sex-linked markers will be helpful for identifying sex-related contigs from whole genome assemblies, thereby broadening our current knowledge of sex chromosome genes and evolution [15].
The ability to correctly identify sex of animals is of critical importance in ecological and evolutionary studies, as well as for artificial breeding and farming purposes [44, 45]. Several approaches have been developed for sex identification in animals, such as behavior observation [46], morphological and external characteristics [47], ultrasonography [48] and hormone levels [49]. However, these methods are prone to high error rates and sometimes technically complex [45]. Genetic sex identification is an essential sex determination tool when the sex of an organism can not be discriminated morphologically [12]. In the last decade, sex-specific DNA markers have been successfully used to distinguish sex of different species, especially in animals at their early developmental stages without obvious sexual traits [12, 21, 43, 50]. The PCR-based method for genetic sex identification is believed to be expedient, time-saving and cost-effective [12, 45, 51].
The sex of S. paramamosain is indistinguishable by morphological traits at their early developmental stages, especially younger than one-month old. The lack of sex identification methods have tremendously limited the study on sex determination and differentiation between males and females. Thus, the molecular sex identification method for S. paramamosain is essential for these reasons. Among the PCR-based sex identification methods, sex-specific primers were usually designed with different strategies, for example, sex-specific DNA sequence [3, 50], two mismatched nucleotides in the forward primer [12], and DNA sequence deletion between sexes [43]. In the present study, four nucleotide mismatches containing three female-specific SNP markers were artificially created that gave positive PCR amplification in females but not in males. Importantly, the mismatch in the 3’ end of the female-specific primer played a vital role in this method because the initial binding site with DNA template is at the 3’ end of the primer. Thus, in addition to providing a novel method for determining the sex of S. paramamosain, especially during larval and juvenile stages, this method also provided new insights into the application of sex-specific SNP markers to genetic sex identification of other brachyuran species in the future, and it should be beneficial for the marker-assisted sex control breeding and aquaculture [21, 50, 52].
Further, the investigation of sex and sex ratio of individuals at three early developmental stages (M, C1 and C2) from a full-sib family showed no significant deviation from the expected ratio of 1:1, which was consistent with the genetic sex determination mechanism suggested in this study. However, the number of females decreased with the growth and development of S. paramamosain. In our previous study, the number of female S. paramamosain at two-month old (older than C2) was also lower than males, but the sex ratio significantly skewed towards females from three-month old to four-month old (unpublished data). The variation of the sex ratio during the process of growth and development could be due to the known aggressive and cannibalistic behavior of Scylla spp., and the growing competition for food and spouses, especially for male crabs [33], which leads to injury and death of males.
Sex-specific markers can also provide insights into sex chromosome conservation and evolution [15, 27]. The same sex-specific markers and sex-determining DNA sequence were identified and verified in bighead carp, silver carp and grass carp by 2b-RAD sequencing, suggesting that the same pathways might be involved in sex determination systems [3]. In this study, S. tranquebarica and S. serrata were proved to have nine and four identical female-specific SNP markers with S. paramamosain, respectively, suggesting that these three crab species may have a homologous nascent W chromosome and share the most recent common ancestor [3]. Therefore, the WZ/ZZ sex determination system is suggested for S. paramamosain, S. tranquebarica and S. serrata. While the data obtained in the present study was unable to draw conclusion on the genetic sex determination system of S. olivacea because no sex-specific markers were observed. However, the sex-specific SNP markers may exist in other genome regions of S. olivacea, hence, further studies should be carried out in the future to explore this.
Although mud crabs have been captured and cultured for over 110 years, the taxonomy of genus Scylla was controversial until the revision by Keenan et al. in 1998 [53], based on genetic variations, external morphology and morphometric characters analysis [54]. Phylogenetic study on genus Scylla based on COI sequence of mtDNA showed that S. paramamosain is genetically closest to S. tranquebarica, and then to S. serrata, while, the largest genetic distance was found with S. olivacea [55, 56]. In the present study, the number of identical female-specific SNP markers were found to be nine between S. paramamosain and S. tranquebarica, four between S. paramamosain and S. serrata, but none between S. paramamosain and S. olivacea, an observation which is supported by the phylogenetic relationships of genus Scylla as determined by previous studies [55, 56]. Nevertheless, we suggest that for deeply understanding the evolution and phylogenetic relationships of genus Scylla, more research should be carried out.
Conclusions
RAD-seq technology has proven to be a good tool for the identification of sex-specific markers in non-model organisms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to identify female-specific SNP markers in mud crab (S. paramamosain) that showed heterozygous in females but homozygous in males. Subsequently, a rapid and effective method for molecular genetic sex identification was developed, by which, the sex of S. paramamosain, S. tranquebarica and S. serrata could be distinguished with a 100% accuracy. Moreover, nine and four identical female-specific SNP markers similar to those in S. paramamosain were identified in S. tranquebarica and S. serrata, respectively. These findings provided a solid evidence for a WZ/ZZ sex determination system in these three mud crab species. This study will not only further our understanding of sex determination mechanism and genome evolution of genus Scylla, but also facilitate mono-sex breeding and aquaculture of these crab species.
Methods
Samples collection and DNA extraction
Twenty wild S. paramamosain (10 males and 10 females), randomly collected from the inshore of Hainan Province, China, were used to determine the potential sex-specific SNP markers by RAD-seq. Another 195 specimens (106 females and 89 males) were collected and used to confirm the sex-specific SNP markers, of which 115 were from the inshore of Shantou and 80 were from a culture pond in Hainan. In addition, 96 specimens (48 females and 48 males) were collected from two culture ponds in Shantou and Raoping for verification of the molecular sex identification method developed based on the sex-specific SNP markers. Another 180 young progenies with unknown sex from a full-sib family were sampled and used to distinguish the sex and sex ratio using the developed molecular sex identification method. Among these progenies, 60 individuals were at megalopa stage (M), 60 individuals were at the first crablet stage (C1), and 60 individuals were at the second crablet stage (C2). In order to test the feasibility of the sex-specific SNP markers and the developed sex identification method in other Scylla species, S. tranquebarica (N = 20, 10 males and 10 females) and S. olivacea (N = 6, 3 males and 3 females) were collected from Setiu Wetlands, Terengganu, Malaysia, whereas S. serrata (N = 6, 3 males and 3 females) was caught from Iloilo, Philippines. The sex of these crabs was identified based on the shape of the abdomen. Females have wider and more globular abdomens, whereas males have narrow and straight abdomens [57].
Before sampling, the crabs were placed on ice for anesthetization (about 10 min). Muscle tissues were frozen in liquid nitrogen and preserved at − 80 °C until DNA extraction. The whole body of the individuals at early developmental stages (M, C1 and C2) were used for DNA extraction due to their small size. Genomic DNA was extracted using TIANamp Marine Animals DNA kit (Tiangen Biotech Co. Ltd., Beijing, China) and treated with RNase A to remove residual RNA. The DNA quality was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis and quantified using a Qubit fluorometer (Life Technologies).
RAD library preparation and sequencing
The RAD library was prepared following previous methods [58–60] with slight modifications. Briefly, approximately 1 μg of genomic DNA from each individual was digested with EcoRI-HF. The P1 adapter which contains individual-specific index sequence of 5 bp long barcode (Table 1) was ligated to the purified products of restriction reaction. The ligated samples were then pooled, purified and randomly sheared to short fragments with an average size of 350 bp using Bioruptor (Diagenode, Liège, Belgium). The P2 adapter which contains a 3′ dT overhang was ligated to the sheared DNA fragments. Furthermore, the ligation mix with 300 to 500 bp was purified using the MinElute Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen). The library was further enriched by high-fidelity PCR using P1 and P2 adapter primers. Finally, the PCR products comprising between 300 and 500 bp were purified and sequenced (2 × 150-bp paired-end reads) on Illumina Hiseq 3000 platform. Raw data generated in this study has been submitted to the NCBI Short Read Archive (SRA) under the accession number SRP135178.
Sequence analysis and sex-specific SNPs discovery
The raw reads from the Illumina Hiseq were first sorted according to the individual-specific index sequence, and then the indexes and low-quality reads were removed by Trim Galore software (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/↗). Quality control analysis was performed to assess the length distribution and GC content of the clean reads using FastQC software (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc↗ /). Individual which named “F2A” has the best sequencing quality and quantity, so clean reads from it were clustered for reference using the software CD-HIT-EST (http://weizhongli-lab.org/cd-hit/↗) under the following thresholds: sequence identity ≥97%, minimum coverage 10, and maximum coverage 400, with the cluster analysis results shown in Additional file 1. After the cluster analysis, clean reads were assembled to contigs using the Spades software (http://cab.spbu.ru/software/spades/↗) with k-mer size of 21, 33 and 55. The contigs shorter than 150 bp were excluded from assembly. The assembled sequences of the sample “F2A” were regarded as a reference, with reads from each sample aligned to the assembled reference of “F2A” using Burrows-Wheeler Alignment Tool (BWA) [61]. The alignment results were processed using SAMtools [62] to identify candidate genetic variants among all sequenced samples, including both SNPs and INDELs. Bcftools and Vcfutils.pl were used to filter variants with the default parameters, such as the minimum root-mean-square read mapping quality of 10, a minimum depth of 2 and the minimum number of read supporting the variant of 2. The SNPs of males and females were summarized respectively, and then the sex-specific SNP markers were identified based on the SNP comparison between males and females. Only SNP markers with a polymorphic genotype associated with the sex were regarded as sex-specific markers.
Development and verification of sex-specific SNP markers
Based on the results of RAD-seq, 11 contigs were found to contain sex-specific SNPs. A total of ten pairs of primers (Table 2) were designed by the Primer Premier 5.0 software, with the exclusion of one contig (cluster 40,991, Table 3) due to the near-end position of the sex-specific SNP marker. PCR amplification was then used to validate the specificity of each sex-specific SNP marker. The PCR reactions were carried out with a total volume of 25 μl, containing 50 ng of template DNA, 2.5 μl of 10 × PCR buffer, 2.0 μl of dNTPs (2.5 mM each), 0.5 μl of each primer (10 μM), 0.5 μl of Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/μl, TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) and water to the final volume. PCR programs were as follows: an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 5 min; then 34 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, annealing temperature of primer pair for 30 s, and 72 °C for 40 s; and a final extension step at 72 °C for 7 min. The amplified products were separated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, and the expected PCR fragments were directly sequenced in both directions by Shanghai Sangon Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The sex-specific SNP markers were determined manually by the peaks and their colors in the chromatogram. Among the sequences, one containing sex-specific SNPs with the best quality and quantity was regarded as sex-related sequence, and was used for further analysis. Furthermore, the sex-related sequence was amplified and the sex-specific SNP markers were verified using 195 other specimens (106 females and 89 males) with known sex. The PCR products were sequenced and the sex-specific SNPs were genotyped as described above.
Development of a rapid method for genetic sex identification
First, the sex-related sequence was aligned to the genome of S. paramamosain (unpublished data), obtaining a longer sequence. The obtained sequence was then verified through molecular cloning and sequencing. The primers (FLFE-1 and FLFE-2, Table 2) used for DNA cloning were designed based on the genome sequences. Next, in order to develop a rapid PCR-based method to identify genetic sex of S. paramamosain, a pair of female-specific primers (SPFS, Table 2) was designed based on the sex-specific SNP markers, which is expected to amplify the sex-specific SNP regions only in females and show female-specific band on agarose gel electrophoresis. Meanwhile, a pair of control primers (SPC, Table 2) were designed based on the longer sex-related sequence and regarded as a control to avoid the presence of false-negative results, which can amplify the same size fragment in both males and females. The optimized PCR parameters of the PCR-based genetic sex identification method are as follows: total PCR reaction volume of 20 μl, containing 75 ng of template DNA, 2.5 μl of 10 × PCR buffer, 1.0 μl of dNTPs (2.5 mM each), 0.25 μl of each primer (10 μM), 0.4 μl of Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/μl, TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) and water to the final volume. The PCR program was as follows: an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 5 min; then 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 65 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 40 s; and a final extension step at 72 °C for 7 min. PCR amplification was conducted in 96 specimens (48 females and 48 males) to verify the PCR-based genetic sex identification method.
Application of the PCR-based genetic sex identification method for determining the sex of individuals at early developmental stages
The sex of 180 individuals of S. paramamosain from a full-sib family at three different early developmental stages, i.e. M, C1 and C2, was identified by the PCR-based genetic sex identification method. The sex ratio at each developmental stage was estimated according to the identification result. Chi-square tests were used to estimate the fitness of sex ratio (female/male) to the expected 1:1.
Cross-species application and verification of sex-specific SNP markers
The sex-specific SNP markers identified from S. paramamosain were cross-species tested in three other Scylla species, i.e. S. tranquebarica, S. serrata and S. olivacea, using PCR amplification and sequencing methods as described above. To test the feasibility of the newly developed molecular sex identification method, PCR amplifications were also carried out (Table 2) in these three other Scylla species.
Data analysis
Chi-square tests were performed using the SPSS 21.0 for Windows (SPSS, Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL, USA), and differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.
Additional files
Additional file 1: The cluster analysis and RAD assembly of sample “F2A”. (DOCX 14 kb) Additional file 2: The RAD-seq alignments between twenty samples and sample “F2A”. (DOCX 16 kb) Additional file 3: Agarose gel separation of PCR amplification products with female-specific and control primers in 24 females and 24 males from a full-sib family cultured in a pond of Raoping, China. Female-specific band (320 bp): PCR products amplified with SPFS primers; Control band (282 bp): PCR products amplified with SPC primers; M: marker; A: the results for 12 females and 12 males. B: the results for another 12 females and 12 males. (DOCX 680 kb)