Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) remains a major challenge in genetic medicine due to the difficulty of achieving durable, body-wide restoration of dystrophin in post-mitotic muscle tissues. Although current therapies-including exon skipping and micro-dystrophin gene replacement-have demonstrated clinical feasibility, their benefits are limited by incomplete efficacy, mutation specificity, and the need for repeated or high-dose interventions. These limitations highlight the need for strategies capable of directly and permanently correcting the underlying genetic defect. Recent advances in genome editing have positioned CRISPR-based technologies as promising candidates for this objective. Rather than functioning as a single approach, gene-editing platforms encompass a spectrum of strategies-including exon deletion, exon reframing, base editing, and prime editing-each with distinct advantages depending on the mutational context. In particular, the emergence of precision editing tools has enabled controlled nucleotide-level modifications, expanding the range of correctable mutations while reducing reliance on double-strand DNA breaks. In this review, we adopt a comparative and translational perspective to evaluate gene-editing strategies for DMD. We examine how different approaches align with specific mutation types, summarize key findings from preclinical studies, and analyze the major barriers to clinical implementation, including delivery efficiency, immune responses, editing durability, and genomic safety. We further discuss emerging innovations in editing technologies and delivery systems that aim to address these limitations. Collectively, this work reframes gene editing as a decision-oriented and application-driven therapeutic framework. Continued integration of advances in genome engineering, delivery platforms, and muscle biology will be essential to translate these technologies into safe, effective, and durable treatments capable of altering the clinical trajectory of DMD.
