Frontiers in pediatrics

Gut bacteria traits and effects of fecal transplant treatment in children with autism in central China

Updated

Abstract

Essence

Children with autism spectrum disorder had altered gut microbiota profiles, and a simplified protocol was followed by improved behavioral and gastrointestinal symptoms at 3 months.

Evidence

This combined cross-sectional study of 48 children with ASD versus 51 matched controls and prospective single-arm follow-up of 25 ASD participants assessed gut microbiota and outcomes after pediatric-donor fecal microbiota transplantation.

Caveat

The treatment phase lacked a control group, included only 25 children, and the abstract's microbiota reporting is incomplete, which limits confidence in the clinical and microbial effects.

Simplified

Key numbers

14.6%
Decrease in scores
scores post-treatment vs. baseline
100%
Improvement rate of gastrointestinal symptoms
Incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms post-
25
Participants receiving
Number of patients who received

Key figures

Figure 1
vs : gut microbiota composition and diversity differences
Highlights reduced microbial diversity and distinct community composition in ASD compared to healthy controls
fped-13-1648471-g001
  • Panel A
    Venn diagram showing unique and shared amplicon sequence variants () between ASD and HC groups
  • Panel B
    indices (, Shannon, Simpson) comparing ASD and HC groups with higher diversity values in HC
  • Panel C
    Principal coordinates analysis () of based on showing separation between ASD and HC microbial communities
  • Panel D
    Boxplot of weighted analysis of similarity () R values indicating significant inter-group microbial differences with higher R value for ASD group
Figure 2
Gut microbiota composition differences between and healthy control children
Highlights distinct gut microbiota profiles with higher scores in ASD versus controls, framing microbial differences
fped-13-1648471-g002
  • Panel A
    -level relative abundance bar chart comparing ASD and groups
  • Panel B
    -level relative abundance bar chart comparing ASD and HC groups
  • Panel C
    -level relative abundance bar chart comparing ASD and HC groups
  • Panel D
    Bar graph of LDA scores (LDA > 3) showing taxa enriched in ASD (positive scores) and HC (negative scores)
  • Panel E
    from highlighting phylogenetic taxa differences between ASD (orange) and HC (blue)
Figure 3
and scores before and after in children with
Highlights a significant reduction in autism symptom severity by CARS scores after FMT treatment
fped-13-1648471-g003
  • Panel A
    ABC scores before (red) and after (blue) FMT treatment with no significant change (p = 0.51)
  • Panel B
    CARS scores before (red) and after (blue) FMT treatment showing a significant decrease after FMT (p = 0.0089)
Figure 4
Gut microbiota diversity and community composition in donors versus pre- and post- patients
Highlights reduced microbial diversity in ASD patients and partial restoration after FMT treatment
fped-13-1648471-g004
  • Panel A
    Venn diagram showing unique and shared counts among donors (D), pre-FMT ASD patients (F0), and post-FMT ASD patients (F1)
  • Panel B
    Species α-diversity measured by , Shannon, and Simpson indices; Faith's diversity appears higher in donors (D) than pre-FMT (F0) and post-FMT (F1) ASD patients
  • Panel C
    plot based on showing β-diversity clustering among donors (D), pre-FMT (F0), and post-FMT (F1) ASD patients with distinct group separation
  • Panel D
    Weighted analysis boxplot showing community differences with R values indicating significant differences among donors (D), pre-FMT (F0), and post-FMT (F1) groups
Figure 5
Gut microbiota composition differences in donors and patients before and after
Highlights shifts in gut bacteria composition with increased beneficial genera after fecal microbiota transplantation in ASD patients
fped-13-1648471-g005
  • Panels A-C
    Relative abundance of gut bacteria at (A), (B), and (C) levels in donors (blue), pre-FMT ASD patients (orange), and post-FMT ASD patients (green); donors appear to have higher Firmicutes and lower Bacteroidetes at phylum level compared to pre-FMT ASD
  • Panel D
    Bar graph of Linear Discriminant Analysis () scores showing bacterial taxa with LDA > 3 that differ among donors, pre-FMT, and post-FMT groups; taxa enriched in donors are mostly Firmicutes, while those enriched in pre-FMT ASD include Proteobacteria and Enterobacteriaceae
  • Panel E
    from highlighting bacterial taxa differentially abundant among donors, pre-FMT, and post-FMT groups with colored branches indicating group enrichment
  • Panel F
    Box plots showing average relative abundance of key bacterial genera Agathobacter, Dorea, and Bifidobacterium across donors, pre-FMT, and post-FMT groups; Agathobacter and Bifidobacterium appear higher in donors and post-FMT compared to pre-FMT
1 / 5

Full Text

What this is

  • This research investigates gut microbiota characteristics in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and evaluates the effects of ().
  • It includes a cross-sectional analysis comparing 48 children with ASD to 51 healthy controls, followed by a prospective study where 25 ASD children received .
  • The study aims to understand the relationship between gut microbiota changes and clinical outcomes in ASD.

Essence

  • A simplified protocol improved gut microbiota composition and alleviated core symptoms and gastrointestinal comorbidities in children with ASD.

Key takeaways

  • Children with ASD exhibited reduced gut microbiota diversity compared to healthy controls, indicating significant dysbiosis. This was characterized by higher levels of potentially harmful bacteria and lower levels of beneficial taxa.
  • Post-, significant clinical improvements were observed, including a 14.6% reduction in core ASD symptoms as measured by CARS scores. Gastrointestinal symptoms showed a 100% improvement rate, demonstrating the 's potential therapeutic impact.
  • altered gut microbiota composition, with increased relative abundances of beneficial genera like Faecalibacterium and Prevotella, suggesting a shift towards a healthier microbiome profile post-treatment.

Caveats

  • The study's small sample size may limit the statistical power and generalizability of the findings. Larger studies are needed to confirm these results.
  • The lack of standardized assessment tools for behavioral and gastrointestinal symptoms may introduce variability in measuring treatment effects.
  • Without a randomized controlled trial design, the efficacy of cannot be definitively established, and potential placebo effects cannot be ruled out.

Definitions

  • Gut microbiota dysbiosis: An imbalance in the gut microbiome characterized by reduced diversity and altered composition, often linked to various health conditions.
  • Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT): A procedure that involves transferring fecal material from a healthy donor to a recipient to restore healthy gut microbiota.

Simplified

what lands in your inbox each week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free