Hydrogel Carbohydrate-Electrolyte Beverage Does Not Improve Glucose Availability, Substrate Oxidation, Gastrointestinal Symptoms or Exercise Performance, Compared With a Concentration and Nutrient-Matched Placebo

Oct 20, 2019International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism

Hydrogel Carbohydrate-Electrolyte Drink Does Not Improve Blood Sugar, Fat Burning, Stomach Comfort, or Exercise Performance Compared to a Similar Placebo

AI simplified

Circadian Biology on OpenScience ↗PubMed ↗DOI ↗

Abstract

No differences in blood glucose levels were observed between the carbohydrate-electrolyte solution with sodium alginate and pectin (CES-HGel) and the standard carbohydrate-electrolyte solution (CES-Std).

Both CES-HGel and CES-Std resulted in similar blood glucose responses during steady-state running.
Substrate oxidation rates for carbohydrates and fats did not differ between the two solutions during either steady-state or time to exhaustion tests.
Gastrointestinal symptoms occurred at the same rate and severity with both CES formulations, affecting all participants.
Breath hydrogen levels did not show significant differences between the two trials.
Time to exhaustion performance was comparable between CES-HGel and CES-Std.

AI simplified

The impact of a carbohydrate-electrolyte solution with sodium alginate and pectin for hydrogel formation (CES-HGel), was compared to a standard CES with otherwise matched ingredients (CES-Std), for blood glucose, substrate oxidation, gastrointestinal symptoms (GIS; nausea, belching, bloating, pain, regurgitation, flatulence, urge to defecate, and diarrhea), and exercise performance. Nine trained male endurance runners completed 3 hr of steady-state running (SS) at 60% V˙O2max, consuming 90 g/hr of carbohydrate from CES-HGel or CES-Std (53 g/hr maltodextrin, 37 g/hr fructose, 16% w/v solution) in a randomized crossover design, followed by an incremental time to exhaustion (TTE) test. Blood glucose and substrate oxidation were measured every 30 min during SS and oxidation throughout TTE. Breath hydrogen (H2) was measured every 30 min during exercise and every 15 min for 2 hr postexercise. GIS were recorded every 15 min throughout SS, immediately after and every 15-min post-TTE. No differences in blood glucose (incremental area under the curve [mean ± SD]: CES-HGel 1,100 ± 96 mmol·L-1·150 min-1 and CES-Std 1,076 ± 58 mmol·L-1·150 min-1; p = .266) were observed during SS. There were no differences in substrate oxidation during SS (carbohydrate: p = .650; fat: p = .765) or TTE (carbohydrate: p = .466; fat: p = .633) and no effect of trial on GIS incidence (100% in both trials) or severity (summative rating score: CES-HGel 29.1 ± 32.6 and CES-Std 34.8 ± 34.8; p = .262). Breath hydrogen was not different between trials (p = .347), nor was TTE performance (CES-HGel 722 ± 182 s and CES-Std: 756 ± 187 s; p = .08). In conclusion, sodium alginate and pectin added to a CES consumed during endurance running does not alter the blood glucose responses, carbohydrate malabsorption, substrate oxidation, GIS, or TTE beyond those of a CES with otherwise matched ingredients.

Full Text

Full text is available at the source.

View full text (HTML) ↗View full text ↗

Hydrogel Carbohydrate-Electrolyte Beverage Does Not Improve Glucose Availability, Substrate Oxidation, Gastrointestinal Symptoms or Exercise Performance, Compared With a Concentration and Nutrient-Matched Placebo

Abstract

Full Text

You found one interesting study. We’ll send the next 7.

what lands in your inbox each week:

Recent issues from the circadian biology brief

Abstract

Full Text

Related papers

You found one interesting study. We’ll send the next 7.

what lands in your inbox each week:

Recent issues from the circadian biology brief