Full text is available at the source.
Abstract
Automated algorithms identified IN and OUT bedtimes with 93-100% consistency compared to 48-83% for patient-reported methods.
- Automated methods demonstrated greater reliability in determining sleep timings than patient diaries.
- All timing methods showed significant correlations in their findings (p < 0.001).
- Excellent agreement was found between patient-reported timings and wrist event markers (ICC 0.829-0.877) as well as thigh accelerometry (ICC 0.892).
- Event markers provided more accurate timing data than sleep diaries, aligning better with actual sleep transitions.
- The method used to determine bedtimes impacted metrics like sleep onset latency and sleep percentage.
Simplified