Archives of microbiology

Creating and testing a flexible gene-silencing system to study bacterial control in the squid-bacteria partnership

Updated

Abstract

Essence

An inducible multiplex toolkit enabled targeted gene repression in Vibrio fischeri and supported testing whether ongoing luminescence is needed to sustain symbiosis beyond 24 hours.

Evidence

This genetic tool development study built and validated Tn7-integrating and shuttle-vector CRISPRi systems in the Euprymna scolopes-Vibrio fischeri symbiosis model using exogenous and endogenous gene targets including mRFP, luxC, and flrA.

Caveat

The findings mainly establish a bacterial gene-repression platform in one animal-microbe model rather than broad biological effects across organisms or direct therapeutic relevance.

Simplified

Key numbers

29×
Maximum Repression
Repression of luxC gene in juvenile squid during induction.
20×
Multiplex Repression Levels
Maximum repression achieved with multiplex targeting.

Key figures

Fig. 1
Cloning of 20-nucleotide sequences into a framework
Highlights efficient insertion of targeting spacers into CRISPRi vectors enabling precise gene repression studies
203_2025_4354_Fig1_HTML
  • Panel A
    Sequence map showing the tripleTIIS cloning site with restriction sites and the sgRNA framework sequence
  • Panel B
    Sequence map showing of annealed 20-nt targeting (oligo 1 and oligo 2) into the empty BsaI-cut cloning site, including the spacer targeting the gene
Fig. 2
expression levels under different inductions and over time in Vibrio fischeri strains
Highlights titratable repression and reversible control of gene expression using inducible in Vibrio fischeri.
203_2025_4354_Fig2_HTML
  • Panel A
    mRFP expression measured as normalized to control at across IPTG concentrations (0 to 2.0 mM) in four strains; ES114:JMP1189 + (RR1) shows visibly lower mRFP expression with increasing IPTG.
  • Panel B
    mRFP expression over 7 hours in ES114:JMP1189 + psgRNA(RR1) strain initially repressed with 2 mM IPTG compared to unrepressed control; expression appears to recover over time after IPTG removal.
Fig. 3
levels in bacterial cultures with and without induction.
Highlights strong luminescence repression by IPTG and recovery after IPTG removal in targeted bacterial strains.
203_2025_4354_Fig3_HTML
  • Panel A
    (relative light units/) at OD = 2.0 in uninduced control strain versus IPTG (2 mM) induced strain, showing significantly reduced luminescence with IPTG induction.
  • Panel B
    Specific luminescence at OD = 2.0 in subcultures grown without IPTG, showing no significant difference between previously induced and control strains.
Fig. 4
and bacterial counts in juvenile squid infected with different (LC1) strains under induction conditions
Highlights reduced luminescence and bacterial colonization in induced strains compared to controls over time
203_2025_4354_Fig4_HTML
  • Panel A
    Mean luminescence over time (0 to 96 hours) for juvenile squid infected with WT ES114, ES114:JMP1189/psgRNA(LC1) without inducer, with 2 mM IPTG before infection, and with 3 mM IPTG added at 24 hours; luminescence is visibly reduced in the induced groups compared to WT and no inducer groups at 24 and 72 hours
  • Panel B
    Colony-forming units () per light organ over time (0 to 96 hours) for the same infection groups; CFU counts appear lower in the induced groups at 96 hours compared to WT and no inducer groups
Fig. 5
fluorescence repression levels in bacterial cultures with different plasmids
Highlights varying levels of mRFP repression across sgRNA plasmids, spotlighting multiplexed targeting effects.
203_2025_4354_Fig5_HTML
  • Single panel
    mRFP repression (%) measured by normalized fluorescence at 0.4 for strains ES114:JMP1189 (control), pMM(), pMM(RR1,2), and pMM(RR1,,FRA) with 2 mM induction; ES114:JMP1189 shows highest repression near 100%, pMM(RR1) and pMM(RR1,LC1,FRA) show intermediate repression around 10-20%, and pMM(RR1,2) shows the lowest repression near 10%.
1 / 5

Full Text

What this is

  • This research develops a versatile () system for manipulating gene expression in the symbiotic relationship between the squid Euprymna scolopes and the bacterium Vibrio fischeri.
  • The system allows for precise, inducible repression of specific genes, enhancing the understanding of genetic regulation within this model organism.
  • It includes a suite of vectors that can target both exogenous and endogenous genes, providing a flexible tool for genetic studies.

Essence

  • A new system was created to enable precise control of gene expression in the Vibrio fischeri-Euprymna scolopes symbiosis, allowing for better exploration of genetic regulation.

Key takeaways

  • The system effectively represses gene expression, achieving up to 29× reduction in luminescence from the luxC gene in vivo, demonstrating its utility for studying symbiotic relationships.
  • Multiplexing capabilities allow simultaneous repression of multiple genes, enhancing the system's flexibility; significant repression was observed with combinations of targeting different genes.
  • The system can be used to probe the temporal dynamics of bioluminescence during host colonization, providing insights into the critical role of luminescence in maintaining symbiotic relationships.

Caveats

  • The system's effectiveness may vary based on the gene targeted, and off-target effects could complicate interpretations of results.
  • Husbandry challenges limit the duration of experiments with juvenile squids, potentially affecting the comprehensiveness of the findings.

Definitions

  • CRISPR interference (CRISPRi): A genetic engineering technique that uses a modified CRISPR system to repress gene expression without altering the DNA sequence.
  • sgRNA: Single-guide RNA, a component of the CRISPR system that directs the Cas9 protein to the target DNA sequence.

Simplified

what lands in your inbox each week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free