Intraoral mobile photography showed a sensitivity of 95.8% for assessing caries experience intensity in children.
Specificity for assessing caries experience intensity was 89.2%.
Mobile photography achieved 100% sensitivity for the simplified oral hygiene index.
The modified gingival index had a sensitivity of 77.6% and specificity of 93.8%.
Positive predictive values ranged from 74.3% to 97.7% across the indices evaluated.
Cohen's Kappa values indicated substantial agreement for most indices, with the highest at 0.928.
Simplified
BACKGROUND: Mobile dental photography is increasing in relevance in the diagnosis of oral diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of intraoral mobile photography in assessing caries experience intensity (decayed, missing/extracted, filled teeth [/]), simplified oral hygiene index, and modified gingival index.
METHODS: This study included 358 children of 7-12 years of age. A clinician evaluated DMFT/deft; simplified oral hygiene; and modified gingival indices by visual examination. Simultaneously, dental students recorded intraoral photographs with a mobile phone in eight predetermined projections. Another oral professional calculated indices based on the photographs. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of dental photography were evaluated, and Cohen's kappa was calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 2864 photographs were evaluated in this study. The sensitivity and specificity of mobile photography for DMFT; deft; simplified oral hygiene, and modified gingival indices were 95.8 (95% confidence interval: 93.4-98.3) and 89.2 (83-95.5); 100.0 (100-100) and 88.6 (79.3-98); 89.7 (85.8-93.5) and 91.4 (86.3-96.5); and 77.6 (67.6-87.6) and 93.8 (91-96.6), respectively; positive predictive values were 96.2, 97.7, 95.6, and 74.3; negative predictive values 88.3, 100.0, 80.9, and 94.8; and Cohen's Kappa values were 0.848, 0.928, 0.784, and 0.702, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraoral mobile photography, based on appropriate guidelines, is reliable for assessing DMFT/deft; simplified oral hygiene; and modified gingival indices in children and could be a useful tool in dental public health, supporting the involvement of dental students in similar research studies.
Key numbers
95.8%
Sensitivity for
Sensitivity of mobile photography for assessing .
89.2%
Specificity for
Specificity of mobile photography for assessment.
96.2%
Positive Predictive Value for
PPV of mobile photography for .
Full Text
We can’t show the full text here under this license.
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The ethical approval of the study was obtained from the Biomedical Research Ethical Council of the School of Health Sciences of the University of Georgia (research code UGREC − 04 − 22/ 09.03.2022). In accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, informed consent was obtained from the guardians of the participants in the study prior to inclusion in the study. Consent for publication: Not Applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
