Full text is available at the source.
Health and social care delivery research···
Assessing mental health decision-making in emergency care: a mixed-methods and cost study
Updated
Abstract
A total of 2,110 first-time referrals to psychiatric decision units were analyzed over two five-month periods.
- Psychiatric decision units may reduce informal psychiatric admissions and mental health presentations at emergency departments.
- Cost savings associated with psychiatric decision units are largely marginal and do not offset their operational costs.
- Referrals to psychiatric decision units tend to result in increased use of inpatient and community care resources.
- Units configured to prioritize reducing informal admissions may enhance the quality of crisis care.
- Effective operation of psychiatric decision units may require integration into a broader crisis care pathway with community support.
Simplified
BACKGROUND: People experiencing mental health crises in the community often present to emergency departments and are admitted to a psychiatric hospital. Because of the demands on emergency department and inpatient care, psychiatric decision units have emerged to provide a more suitable environment for assessment and signposting to appropriate care.
OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to ascertain the structure and activities of psychiatric decision units in England and to provide an evidence base for their effectiveness, costs and benefits, and optimal configuration.
DESIGN: This was a mixed-methods study comprising survey, systematic review, interrupted time series, synthetic control study, cohort study, qualitative interview study and health economic evaluation, using a critical interpretive synthesis approach.
SETTING: The study took place in four mental health National Health Service trusts with psychiatric decision units, and six acute hospital National Health Service trusts where emergency departments referred to psychiatric decision units in each mental health trust.
PARTICIPANTS: Participants in the cohort study (= 2110) were first-time referrals to psychiatric decision units for two 5-month periods from 1 October 2018 and 1 October 2019, respectively. Participants in the qualitative study were first-time referrals to psychiatric decision units recruited within 1 month of discharge (= 39), members of psychiatric decision unit clinical teams (= 15) and clinicians referring to psychiatric decision units (= 19). n n n n
OUTCOMES: Primary mental health outcome in the interrupted time series and cohort study was informal psychiatric hospital admission, and in the synthetic control any psychiatric hospital admission; primary emergency department outcome in the interrupted time series and synthetic control was mental health attendance at emergency department. Data for the interrupted time series and cohort study were extracted from electronic patient record in mental health and acute trusts; data for the synthetic control study were obtained through NHS Digital from Hospital Episode Statistics admitted patient care for psychiatric admissions and Hospital Episode Statistics Accident and Emergency for emergency department attendances. The health economic evaluation used data from all studies. Relevant databases were searched for controlled or comparison group studies of hospital-based mental health assessments permitting overnight stays of a maximum of 1 week that measured adult acute psychiatric admissions and/or mental health presentations at emergency department. Selection, data extraction and quality rating of studies were double assessed. Narrative synthesis of included studies was undertaken and meta-analyses were performed where sufficient studies reported outcomes.
RESULTS: Psychiatric decision units have the potential to reduce informal psychiatric admissions, mental health presentations and wait times at emergency department. Cost savings are largely marginal and do not offset the cost of units. First-time referrals to psychiatric decision units use more inpatient and community care and less emergency department-based liaison psychiatry in the months following the first visit. Psychiatric decision units work best when configured to reduce either informal psychiatric admissions (longer length of stay, higher staff-to-patient ratio, use of psychosocial interventions), resulting in improved quality of crisis care or demand on the emergency department (higher capacity, shorter length of stay). To function well, psychiatric decision units should be integrated into the crisis care pathway alongside a range of community-based support.
LIMITATIONS: The availability and quality of data imposed limitations on the reliability of some analyses.
FUTURE WORK: Psychiatric decision units should not be commissioned with an expectation of short-term financial return on investment but, if appropriately configured, they can provide better quality of care for people in crisis who would not benefit from acute admission or reduce pressure on emergency department.
STUDY REGISTRATION: The systematic review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews as CRD42019151043.
FUNDING: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/49/70) and is published in full in; Vol. 11, No. 25. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information. Health and Social Care Delivery Research
Related papers
Feb '24
Training to reduce conflict in adult acute and forensic hospital units: review and trial of the EDITION program
cited by 15 papers
systematic review
Apr '24
Comparing ways general doctors work in or near emergency rooms using mixed methods
top 30% journal
cited by 3 papers
research support, non-u.s. gov't
Nov '23
Ways to Lower Unexpected Hospital Visits from Care Homes: A Review
top 30% journal
cited by 18 papers
systematic review